• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Forgetting - why we forget.

Extracts from this document...


Forgetting To understand why we forget we must ask: 1. If the information has been stored. i.e. availability 2. Can the information be retrieved. i.e. accessibility Atkinson and Shiffrin Availability is due to the transfer of information from the short term memory to the long term memory whilst accessibility is to do with the long term memory. Trace decay, displacement and interference prevents information staying in short term memory long enough to be transferred to long term memory. Interference, motivated forgetting and cue - dependant forgetting are all to do with the failure to retrieve. Trace Decay William James (1890) Stated that learning leaves a 'trace' in the brain (i.e. there is some sort of physical change after learning). Forgetting is due to a spontaneous fading or weakening of the neural memory trace over time. Hebb (1949) Stated that it only applies to short term memory. Evidence seems to sagest that it is what happens in between learning and recall which determines forgetting in short term memory not time. Displacement In limited short term memory store, new items displace old items i.e. 7 +/- 2 items. There is some evidence to support this. ...read more.


If trace decay is occurring memory should be better. Displacement There is some evidence to support the idea of displacement Shallice (1967) Presented subjects with a list of numbers. The more numbers that followed a probe number the less likely the probe number was to be remembered. The later numbers tend to displace the earlier numbers making them more difficult to remember. However because the earlier numbers were presented first they were forgotten as a result of trace decay. Shallice claimed that although time appeared to have some effect on recall, the number of items following a probe number had a grater effect. This suggest that displacement provides a better explanation of forgetting in short term memory than trace decay. Interference Support fro interference theory is based mainly on the findings of laboratory experiments. Slamecka (1966) Participants were given a word i.e. animal and asked for a word they associated with it i.e. dog. They gave the first word that came to mind which probably reflects an everyday situation. They were then asked to learn a new set of words linked to animal such as cow bear cast etc. they were than asked to recall these words including their first associated word dog. ...read more.


Eysenck (1998) It has proved easy to demonstrate powerful effects of cue - dependant forgetting inside the laboratory. It seems probable that this is the main reason for forgetting in long term memory. Emotional factors Flash bulb memories Researchers disagree about the existence of flash bulb memories. Conway (1995) Argues that flash bulb memories are a distinctive type of memory characterised by the emotional response an event produces ad the importance attached to the event. Others researches see nothing special about so - called flash bulb memories. They see them as subject to the normal process of forgetting just like any other memory. There is some evidence to support both points of view. Motivated forgetting It is difficult to evaluate the evidence on repressed memories for the following reasons: 1. they are not easy to retrieve 2. creating the kind of traumatic experiences required would be very difficult 3. it would also be unethical to create traumatic experiences 4. researchers have tried to create repressed memories but the mild anxiety that results is hardly a basis for repression Holmes (1990) These experiments have provided little or no evidence for repressed memories. Most of the evidence comes from clinical studies where psychiatrists ask their clients detailed and probing questions about past events. As Psychology Forgetting Unit One ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays


    As mentioned above the following variables would be added to the investigation: the time of day in which the experiment was carried out, the age of the participants, criteria of distraction and what included doing and finally the duration of the distraction.

  2. This study is based on the theory of cue dependent forgetting - more specifically, ...

    However, the effects of participant variables were reduced by randomly allocating participants to groups. An independent measures design does however have benefits. Unlike repeated measures, independent measures design only involves testing participants once so order effects (practice and fatigue) do not need to be considered and unlike a method of matched pairs, it is not expensive and time consuming.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    Participants were presented with List A of words for 2 minutes, before taking a 2 minutes gap until they are asked to recall words on sheet A. 4. After the recall accuracy data of List A was collected, participants were then required to repeat the same recalling activity but

  2. why do humans forget?

    However, there are some other theories: * Trace decay * Interference * Cue dependence * Repression * Schema distortion Trace decay As I have mentioned, trace decay theory of forgetting occurs as a result of the automatic decay of the memory trace.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    Participants in the independent groups design are also randomly assigned to each condition which means that the participants will have an equal chance of being assigned to each of the conditions. The target population for this experiment was students in Year 10-13 in Shrewsbury International School of Bangkok.

  2. Cue-dependent forgetting theory by Tulving

    proactive interference long-term memory by looking at retention rates of material over 24 hours. Proactive interference is where material you leaned first, interferes with material that you learn later. Participants were shown lists of nonsense words over a set time.

  1. Why do we forget?

    Most of the things that we experience, and later on don't remember, are not because that we forget, it's because we fail to encode the information into long-term memory in the first place. This is understandable since our mind can't remember every single thing that we experience.

  2. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    The youngest was 16 and the oldest 18. Conditions were allocated to participants by alternation, whereby odd-numbered participants (1st, 3rd, 5th, ...) were allocated to Condition A (categorised) and even-numbered participants (2nd, 4th, 6th, ...) were allocated to Condition B (randomised).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work