• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Loftus and Palmer APFCC

Extracts from this document...


Loftus and Palmer aimed to investigate whether the language used when interviewing an eye witness about an event can act as a leading question and therefore distort the reconstruction of the event in the memory system. They were interested in factors that can influence the accuracy of eye witness testimony, making it unreliable. Allport and Postman demonstrated how schemas already set in the memory system can affect the reconstruction of an event. Participants were shown a slide of a white man attacking a black man with a razor, and were told to report the scene to the second person, who then had to report it to the third and so on. The scene became distorted over time, and over 50% who received the final description had the razor in the hands of the black man. It seems that participants 'prejudice' schemas (blacks more violent than whites) cause them to distort the way they constructed and stored the information in memory. ...read more.


Within these groups they were tested in various sizes depending on availability. Participants watched 7 films of a car accident, each lasting between 5-30 seconds. The videos were shown to each group in a different order. Following this, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire, which included the critical question, 'How fast was the car going when they (verb) into each other?' 5 verbs were used. These were; hit, smashed, bumped, collided and contacted, each being given to 9 participants each. The independent variable in this study was the verb used, and the dependent variable was the estimates of speed. For experiment 2, 150 participants were split into 3 groups of equal sizes, within which they were tested in various sizes, again depending on their availability. The groups were shown a film of a car accident, which lasted about 1 minute long with the accident scene lasting 4 seconds. They were then asked to complete a questionnaire which included a critical question related to the speed of the vehicle. ...read more.


They concluded that changing a single word can have an effect on the answer given. The verb 'smashed' implied a greater speed than the verb 'contacted' and therefore implied a more serious incident, changing the reconstructive memory in the participants memory. For experiment 2, Loftus and Palmer found that the average estimate of speed for the smashed condition was 10.46 compared to 8mp for the hit condition, highlighting a difference of 2.46mph and being found significant at p<0.05. The smashed condition resulted in significantly more 'yes' responses and higher estimates of speed, which was found significant at p<0.025. A week later, 32% of the smashed condition reported seeing broken glass, compared to 14% of the hit condition, showing an 18% difference. Loftus and Palmer concluded that the wording of a question can have a significant effect on the outcome of the participant. The verb 'smashed' acted as a leading question and affected the participants response to the broken glass question a week later, making the event seem more serious. Therefore a week later when asked, 'Did you see any broken glass?', participants were more likely to say yes. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

This is a good response to the question as the candidate has described to a great level of detail the study on the reliability of eyewitness testimony by Loftus & Palmer. Previously, they outline the first study by Loftus & ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This is a good response to the question as the candidate has described to a great level of detail the study on the reliability of eyewitness testimony by Loftus & Palmer. Previously, they outline the first study by Loftus & Palmer and the study by Carmichael into the nature of memory and the role of schemas in reconstructing witnessed events, which acts as a great foundation for the description of Loftus & Palmer's study. It also shows the examiner there is a good level of knowledge behind this essay, bringing it above the potentially prescriptive formula suggested for questions like these and making it a thoroughly interesting read to see so much evidence written so clearly.

Level of analysis

The Level of Analysis here is not assessed, as this is a "Describe" question likely to be worth around 8-10 marks in which candidates are instructed to describe a certain study. The candidate here can expect to receive full marks as the detail they write with in terms of the aim, sample, procedure, and results, all of which are accurate is simply outstanding. The candidate writes with clarity even when handling difficult numerical values. All in all this is a very nicely structured and very well-presented essay that conveys an excellent knowledge of Loftus & Palmer's study into the reliability of eyewitness testimony.

Quality of writing

The Quality of Written Communication here is very good, even with all the complex numerical values which can often be hard to implement into length text and still form a flowing discourse. The candidate's use of psychological terminology is appropriate and accurate and there are no instance where errors in spelling, in punctuation or a misuse of grammar compromises the clarity of the essay.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by sydneyhopcroft 10/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    So trace decay is a valid theory but it is not the main reason for forgetting in long-term memory as there are other factors and it is not easy to assess. Explain the terms proactive and retroactive interferences. Proactive interference - past experiences interfere with current recall.

  2. Peer reviewed

    A study by Loftus and Palmer (1974) into the accuracy of Eye Witness Testimony ...

    4 star(s)

    Lastly, there is also research into how age affects accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Studies have shown that children are more likely to get influenced if tested on eye witness testimony than adults due to things such as language ability or memory processes.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    A TABLE TO SHOW DIFFRENCE IN AVERAGES CLACULATED USING THE RECALL TEST GIVEN TO TWO GROUPS (OF 10 PARTICIPANTS) UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS Measure of central tendency Condition 1: immediate recall Condition 2: with an added distraction Mean 8.5 7 Median 8.5 6.5 Mode 8 and 9 6 and 9 Standard deviation 3.5 8 (For calculations see Appendix 1& 2)

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    This experiment was taken under a controlled condition where all the participants were being given the exact same amount of time to recall the words in the list for each participant (one minute) and the same amount of time given to view the words.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Freud proposed the theory that individuals may unconsciously chose to forget an event that they have found particularly anxiety provoking or disturbing in order to prevent psychological damage- he called this 'repression'. However due to ethical and practical difficulties it is hard to prove this theory or provide an evidence towards the idea.

  2. 'Organisation in Memory'.

    Another ethical consideration to take into account is that of informed consent. The participants will be selected on a college open day, so it would be simple for them just to agree to take part without really understanding what was occurring.

  1. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    These experiments can be anything from creating patterns with objects and writing to role-playing. Promoting self-awareness is the main objective of gestalt therapy but other areas such as improving the ability to support ones emotional feelings are also important. Gestalt therapy is influenced by psychoanalytic theory and therapists will concentrate

  2. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    He probably has poor personal hygiene. His level of intelligence is likely to be low and if employed his work is likely to be unskilled. He may well be suffering from acute psychological disturbance and could be psychotic. The British approach also known as ?Bottom Up? was a result of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work