• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline two explanations of attachment and evaluate their ability to explain attachment

Extracts from this document...


Outline two explanations of attachment and evaluate their ability to explain attachment. One explanation of attachment was the psychoanalytic approach developed by Freud. He suggested that attachment was based on food and described children being born with an innate drive for pleasure, which he referred to as the pleasure principle. The idea was that everyone was motivated by this principle and that we demand immediate satisfaction. In infancy the pleasure is fulfilled through oral satisfaction or feeding. Freud then suggested that as an infant, you form a strong attachment with the person who provides you with the food. This implies that all attachments in infancy are explained by feeding and nothing else and may even suggest that a child isn't specifically attached to its mother. This is strong evidence to suggest that attachment in childhood is driven by the demands for food and oral satisfaction. However, this approach is unfalsifiable. The ideas we're talking about are theoretical, hence they cannot be tested or measured. ...read more.


and a conditioned response (the attachment). This agreed with Freud's psychoanalytic theory suggesting that food was the drive for attachment and that infants will eventually become attached to the figure that provides them with their food. But this theory, similar to the psychoanalytic approach, doesn't allow for any other sources of attachment to be considered. Both these approaches are "cupboard love" theories, which means that they both suggest attachment relies on food alone. This is why they do not allow for any other sources of attachment to be considered, such as love or attention received. For example, according to these two theories, the PCG must always be the same person as the PAF, which isn't always true in reality. Not only that, but the behaviourist approach reduces a complex human into a simple stimulus response pair. It assumes that the human mentality is much simpler than it is in real life. Schaffer and Emerson conducted a study where they looked at 60 children throughout infancy and studied their development of attachments. ...read more.


Harlow found that the monkeys spent the most time with the mother in the soft cloth rather than the mother who provided them with food. This supports the suggestion that the behaviourist theory is incorrect and that food is not the only reason for attachment. It agrees with Schaffer and Emerson's study in that food was not the key factor in forming the strongest attachments among infants. However, this experiment was conducted using monkeys and therefore has low population validity, as it cannot be generalised to all humans. Overall, there is strong evidence to suggest that both the psychoanalytic approach and the behaviourist approach are incorrect and that they show weak ability of explaining what causes attachments in infancy. Better explanations were made by Schaffer and Emerson in their study of 60 children and their primary and multiple attachments and Harlow and his monkeys, where monkeys preferred the soft mother than the food-providing mother. These both suggest that primary attachments are in fact down to the love and attention they receive and the interaction they are provided with as oppose to who supplies them with their food. Sarah Feehan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate one or more explanations of attachment

    3 star(s)

    Certain behaviours called social releases encourage the bond. Social releases include smiling, crying, cooing, looking cute etc. they all make adults respond and bond with them. Bowlby also believed that there is a critical period between 7months and 2-3 years for attachment to occur.

  2. Reactive Attachment Disorder

    They have often undergone changes in caregiver at critical times relative to the formation of a secure attachment orientation. When they are searching for a discriminate attachment figure from which to venture out to unfamiliar adults, they often do not have that secure base established.

  1. Infant's Attachments

    a great influence on how he or she acts socially in the future. "The importance of early infant attachment cannot be overstated. It is at the heart of healthy child development and lays the foundation for relating intimately with others, including spouses and children.

  2. Describe and Evaluate Explanations of Attachment

    Harlow showed that from an infant's point of view at least, food does not appear to be the main motivating factor in forming attachments. Operant conditioning refers to voluntary behaviour and the concept of reinforcement and punishment; behaviour is influenced in the future by its learned consequences.

  1. Investigaiting the aquisition of numerical ability

    These are epistemic and ludic behaviours. Epistemic behaviours are related to the acquisition of knowledge and skills through the use of language, visual experiences and exploratory practical investigations and problem-solving activities with objects and materials. Activities to stimulate epistemic behaviours may include: individual or collaborative free-play experimentation with unfamiliar objects, teacher directed interactive exposition of new

  2. Outline and evaluate Explanations of Attachment.

    A second explanation of attachment is the learning theory, the idea that all behaviour is learnt either by association (classical conditioning) or consequences (operant conditioning). By classical conditioning the pleasure of feeding becomes associated with the person who feeds the infant and this person therefore becomes a source of pleasure even when there is no feeding.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work