• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The concept of the tragedy of the commons can be used to explain the effects of human behaviour on the natural environment." Discuss this statement, using relevant research and theories from social psychology.

Extracts from this document...


"The concept of the tragedy of the commons can be used to explain the effects of human behaviour on the natural environment." Discuss this statement, using relevant research and theories from social psychology. The behaviour of the individual often tends to be selfishly orientated. He or she would pursue their own interests in order to increase their selfish gains in the short run. However in the long run, it is their own actions which will ultimately lead to their own detriment, along with the rest of the community. When this behavioural characteristic is considered in an environmental context, we realise that many of the problems which threaten the state of the natural environment, and therefore of future human existence, arise from this simple but malignant social trap. By the time the costs of self interest behaviours become salient, it is almost always too late to reverse the damage done. "The Tragedy of the Commons" (sometimes referred to as the "commons dilemma" in a broader sense) was a concept introduced by ecologist Garett Hardin (1968)i to illustrate the resource dilemma, and also the conflict between self-interest and collective interest. The name was derived from centrally located public pastures in old English villages called the "commons", where villagers could freely graze their cows, or other livestock. Imagine one hundred villagers sharing a common pasture which is sufficient enough for the grazing of 100 cows. ...read more.


To explain this, the elements of the commons dilemma have been isolated in laboratory games by social psychologists. The games expose how anybody, benevolent or not, can become socially trapped in mutually destructive behaviourv. In Edney J.'s Nuts game (1979)vi American participants where sat around a bowl with 10 metal nuts. The goal of the game is to accumulate as many nuts as possible. They were allowed to take as many as they want any time they want, and the number of nuts remaining in the bowl would double every 10 seconds. Ideally, the nuts should be left in the bowl to double over and over, in order to produce a larger sum of nuts to be shared among all the participants. But unless the participants where given time to discuss cooperation, each were more likely to grab as many nuts as they can within the first 10 seconds, for fear of competition from others. Thus, the nuts in the bowls where never given the chance to replenish. This is the case with renewable resources in the environment: renewable resources are only renewable if they are given the chance to regenerate. Such individualism is not unique to the individualistic culture of America. Edney's findings are supported in other cross cultural studies. In Japan, a collectivistic culture, Kaori Sato (1987)vii gave participants opportunities to plant and harvest trees from a simulated forest for money. ...read more.


the one confessing would either have a lighter sentence than the other, or the same sentence as the other - no loss. Again, cooperation and communication are the key factors in achieving a desirable mutual - and individual - goal. So how can these social traps and dilemmas be resolved, so as to protect our natural environment? In the case of the commons dilemma, one solution is the organisation of group action, and putting in place regulations and other external controls. When reflecting on the tragedy of the Commons, Hardin wrote: Ruin is the destination to which all men rush, each pursuing his own best interest in a society that believes in the freedom of the commons. Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all. (1968) Studies and history shows that when faced with an overused resource, people tend to elect a leader and restrict individual choices for the good of the collective group. Example: The International Whaling Commission sets an agreed-upon "harvest" that enables whales to regenerate. Another solution is to educate people about the future consequences of their actions upon the natural environment, but this has limited effectiveness, depending on the media of information and the way education is delivered. Also, subdivision of the commons, or resource pool is proven to be effective, as it decreases the diffusion of responsibility. Communication is also a key factor in changing the people's attitudes to environment. Is there is sufficient communication, they would have trust in one another so they feel like they are competing for resources. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    The costs of helping may include effort (e.g. helping may be demanding), time (e.g. helping may make us late) and risk of harm (e.g. we may get hurt) All these factors are weighed against the benefits of helping, such as social approval (e.g.

  2. Deindividuation theories.

    The existence of a group's salient identity doesn't mean that behaviour will be entirely norm-directed. Group members must have the power to express norms even when the out-group resists. SIDE claim that manipulating visibility and hence anonymity, affects the power that the in-group has in expressing aspects of the groups norms that the out-group may deem punishable.

  1. Gordon Allport claimed that 'attitudes' were social psychology's most 'indispensable concept'. To what extent ...

    This is an old study, but is advantageous being conducted in the field (high ecological validity) as opposed to many social psychology studies conducted in laboratories. Moreover, it questioned the predictive validity of questionnaires (Hogg and Vaughan 2002). Wicker (1969)

  2. Sexual dysfunctions are dyadic phenomena. Discuss.

    The "merger's" authoritarian acts consequently results in other partner's low sexual desire and even when engaging into sexual activity, he or she would be unresponsive. The withholding partner displays "passive-aggressive" behaviour, i.e. holding on to only aspects of his or hers authority, by resisting to sexual desire.

  1. Genetics and environment: inseparable when discussing criminality.

    so would this mean that depressive individuals will tend to criminality? This correlation seems to be absurd; this is why the study showed that serotonin was linked to inhibition and maintaining mood, not directly to criminal behaviour. This would mean that low serotonin levels would have different effects on different people depending on their background.

  2. AS Communication Studies Presentation

    their discussion of channels of communication, production of texts and generation of meanings. This can lead to complex debate which is not accessible to all students but which can enable some to work successfully within the assessment criteria for level 4 and indeed level 5.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work