• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What does the Genie case tell us about how children learn language?

Extracts from this document...


What does the Genie case tell us about how children learn language? Discovering how children leant to speak has been a highly controversial and discussed topic amongst language scholars. Normal children learn language through many different ways. There are several stages each child will go through. The first is the proto-words stage. This is where babies will babble. They enjoy the sound of their voice. This takes place between 0-6 months old. Between 7-12 months a baby begins to understand simple words from its mother. It will respond to these using simple hand movements and gestures. By 12 months old the child will have reached the linguistic period and should be able to say a few simple words, like dada or mama. By 24 months the child will be saying `noun phrases' and may be under or over extending words. Between 3-4 years the child will be able to form simple sentences using correct grammar. Skinner, Noam Chomsky, Eric Lenneburg and Jean Piaget have proposed the most plausible theories. ...read more.


He called this animal a "Wug". He then showed a picture with many wugs on it. He asked the children what was on the card now and they instinctively said "Wugs". This helps to prove that plurals are inherent and not learnt, because all the children would not have heard the word wug before the experiment. There are problems with this theory too: The main criticism of Chomsky's theory is that it underestimates the power and role of language as a social phenomenon. Cases such as Genie prove that social interaction is essential for language to occur. Lenneburg developed Chomsky's idea of LAD. He said there was a critical period within which a child must be exposed to language in order to develop normally. They must learn language before reaching puberty. Piaget argues that children can only use a certain linguistic structure when they understand the concepts involved. Studies have been made of children whose mental development has been retarded but who can still speak fluently. ...read more.


She now barely said a word. The case of Genie appeared to prove Lenneburg's theory. Lenneburg said that a child must have interaction with humans and learn to speak before puberty or they will never learn at all. In other cases of feral children, some, who were discovered at a much younger age than Genie, learnt language and were eventually able to speak well. Cases such as Genie, or Wild Peter (found age 12) were unable to do more than string a few words together. Genie failed to learn any kind of grammar. According to Chomsky this is what distinguishes the language of humans from the of animals. Genie could not grasp the difference between various pronouns or between active and passive verbs. In that sense she appeared to have passed the critical period. The problem with the case of Genie and the validity of Lenneburg's theory is that Genie was brain damaged. If she had had a normal functioning brain then the case would have proved Lenneburg's theory without a doubt. As it stands, because of her brain damage we can never be sure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. counselling stages of attachement

    * The differences were not great, but they were statistically significant, * However, Belsky found no negative effects in attachments if the day care had started after the child was one. But he did find day care children were inclined to be more aggressive with their peers.

  2. This curriculum plan is to be based on children aged between nought to two ...

    I also understand all the different areas that have to be planned out and why e.g. anti-discriminatory/anti-biased practice, health and safety etc. overall this curriculum plan has taught me a lot about children aged nought to three years old and the framework suitable for them and also taught me things

  1. Samuel and Bryant (conservation)Bandura, Ross and Ross (aggression)Hraba and Grant (doll choice) a. What ...

    Samuel and Bryant support the cognitive approach to child development (this approach states that as children grow older they will adopt new strategies with which to process information). Therefore, it was learnt that children who do not display the ability to conserve have just not attained strategies such as the

  2. Using studies from the list below, answer the questions which follow: Rosenhan (sane in ...

    Then it stopped calling out: and I sat down on top of the crumpled one'. Freud and the father interpreted the dream/fantasy as being a reworking of the morning exchanges in the parental bed. Hans enjoyed getting into his parents bed in a morning but his father often objected (the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work