• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the usefulness of studying philiosophy.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Philosophy is to be studied, not for the sake of any definite answers to its questions, since no definite answers can, as a rule, be known to be true, but rather for the sake of the questions themselves.' (Bertrand Russell, Problem of Philosophy, pp. 93-94). Discuss the usefulness (or the lack of it) of studying philosophy with reference to the statement above. Draw appropriate examples from your engagement with the subject so far as well as from your own personal experience. I agree with the above statement to a moderate extent, as I believe that while there are some definite answers to some of the questions Philosophy poses, it is true that Philosophy is to be studied for the sake of the questions themselves. I also feel that studying Philosophy can be useful to a large extent in many areas of life, as it is not limited by factors pertaining to a single subject, apart from the question of knowledge. The mention of the word 'Philosophy' is more than likely to evoke images of old men with long beards and white hair, as well as abstract and incomprehensible truths and axioms. In fact, the phrase "a philosophical attitude" is often used to refer to a stoical and passive approach to life and taking things without caring too much about their consequence and implications. ...read more.

Middle

Philosophy teaches us how we should live life, while at the same time refusing to dictate what we should and should not do with our lives. Philosophy is a means to understand in greater depth other disciplines, and it is all about learning skills which we can use for other purposes. Philosophy unites and divides. But most of all, Philosophy teaches. Philosophy teaches us more about ourselves and what we truly understand. It shows us where we are wrong, and what we can do to improve ourselves, and this is where Philosophy does play a part in our day-to-day lives. Philosophy is also useful helping to understand the grey areas regarding many important questions about a discipline, such as the nature of its concepts and its relation to other disciplines4. Such questions are usually not pursued in the study of that discipline itself, and it is up to Philosophy to find the answers, if any, for these highly important, but neglected questions. An example of this would be to use the skills Philosophy teaches to try and understand how science relates to math and geography, or how history relates to literature. A critical look at the relationship between these subjects reveals that there are often close links between them. ...read more.

Conclusion

That said, I do believe that there is far more benefit to be gained from the study of the questions themselves, and that the search for answers should remain secondary in nature. Thus my conviction is that Philosophy should be studied for the sake of the questions themselves, with definite answers only being far less important. In conclusion, I feel that the primary usefulness of Philosophy is its immense relevance to our lives in the context of understanding our surroundings better, in the quest to gain a greater and more in-depth view of other disciplines. Philosophy involves the learning of skills which can be applied elsewhere, and teaches us how to think, reason and live our lives. The bottom line here is that Philosophy is useful because of its practical aspects. There may certainly be other possible ways Philosophy can be studied, such as solely for the sake of questioning, as Russell suggests. However, these methods pale in comparison to the practicality and versatility of studying Philosophy in order to learn new thinking skills. Wordcount: 1,493 words 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy 2 Bertrand Russell, "The Philosophy of Logical Atomism," in his Logical Atomism, 141. 3 Adapted from http://www.philosophy.uncc.edu/mleldrid/intro/odop.html 4 Adapted from http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/95_docs/hager.html 5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Mathematics ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    Another way of attempting to describe religious language is through the issues relating to "Myth". Myths express claims that cannot be conveyed in any other way. It frequently makes use of symbol, metaphor and imagery in a narrative context. Myths are not to be thought of as expressing information that is "not true", but instead conveying concepts that is otherworldly.

  2. A Critical Analysis of Lao Tzu's Tao Teh Ching - Chineses philosophy.

    since there is always an element of interpretation involved in all inquiry, and since all cultural descriptions are necessarily comparative. If, on the other hand, "on its own terms" means a hermeneutic understanding, i.e. understanding a piece of text, or an argument, in the context of the whole of the

  1. Introduction to Philosophy.

    {Parmenides (c.500, Elea): reality is one, eternal, unchanging. From this it follows that the world of appearances is illusory and that the ultimate is non-sensible, reachable only by pure thought and argument (this proved to be a crucial influence upon Plato).

  2. Synoptic Study, Satre, Engels and Marx

    This does not impinge or limit my freedom I am still entirely free to create my own purpose and essence I just have to do it in the physical situation I am in. facticty is not so much a limitation of my freedom, rather the frame in which I can exercise my freedom in.

  1. Can computers think?

    correctly reply to questions such as "'Consider the machine specified as follows.... Will this machine ever answer 'Yes' to any question?' The dots are to be replaced by a description of some machine [...]."6 A machine that could perform all of these tasks would clearly be a very complex one.

  2. Ethical language is meaningless. Discuss.

    would make no more sense than asking ?does happiness make people happy?? However, it does make sense and so goodness cannot be a property of happiness. If we make statements such ?Mother Theresa helped the dying? it is still right to ask ?were those actions good?? It is still possible

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work