• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the contributions that two of the following may make to a study of religious language

Extracts from this document...


(i) Examine the contributions that two of the following may make to a study of religious language. The basic question behind the religious language debate is 'what can be said about god?' The religious language debate is not concerned with whether or not god actually exists, or what god is like. There are a lot of contributions to religious language and different approaches by a lot of different philosophers they are only concerned with working out whether or not religious language means anything. On one side of the debate you have the centuries old tradition of religious believers who believe that you can speak and write about god, because is actually reality, but then on the other hand you have the logical positivists and those that they influenced who claim that statements about god have no meaning because they don't actually related to anything that is real. The myth is one of the most complex types of symbolic language since it incorporates symbols, metaphors and models. When people come to speak about myths its usually to say that something is untrue. However a modern understanding of this sees that myths as giving an insight into human experiences, some theologians have chose to interpret religious statements and texts as myths. ...read more.


He explains that a word such as 'perfect' when applied to a created being has a different meaning to when it is applied to God; it is not being used univocally. This is because we understand God to be perfect which is what Aquinas explains to be analogy. This is contrasted to Tillich's starting point as he explains that it is through metaphors and symbols. Aquinas rejects the use of univocal and equivocal language to talk about God; instead he uses analogy which is basically a comparison between two things in which the first simpler thing is used to explain the second more complex thing which is in some way similar. This means analogy relies on the fact there is some point of comparison which links the two things. Analogy can be used to describe God because he is revealed through Creation meaning there is some point of comparison between God and the world, as most believe that god was the creator of the world. There is then analogy of attribution which means words such as just and good may be applied to God as well as human beings. ...read more.


For Stevenson, ethical statements are based upon firm, justifiable beliefs about the world and the way in which it should work, and therefore are meaningful. We disapprove of the Holocaust murders not just because they are not to our taste but because we have firm, justifiable beliefs about human dignity and worth. Although Flew provoked a debate by stating that religious language is only meaningful in so far as it can be falsified. What he meant by this is that often religious statements are qualified to the point that they lose their meaning. Another way of expressing this could be by saying that when people make religious assertions they add the rider 'yes but... .' this seemed unsatisfactory to Flew a d he concluded that 'to assert something is to deny something else. An assertion which does not rules out anything, but rather is compatible with an conceivable state of affairs, does not disappear to assert anything either' Although there are a lot of arguments towards the fact that religious language is meaningful and they also give relevant debates towards this which also seem to make sense towards religious language and talking about god and whether it is meaningful or not and it depends on which stance people take on this topic to which argument they may prefer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    like an over protective parent, as for Mill, this does nothing but prevent the development of fully mature adults. Mill's argument primarily questions what is the rightful limit to the sovereignty of the individual over himself? And how much of human life should be assigned to individuality, and how much to society?

  2. "Religious Language is meaningless." Discuss.

    Basil Mitchell, the second of these theologians, points out that religious belief is not amenable to falsification. However, they are still a realistic interpretation of reality that is based on observable date from the empirical world. He believed that religious beliefs are held on trust, falsible in principle, however, not in practice.

  1. Religious language is meaningless. Discuss.

    Hare also went on to say that looking at the world in this way is seen as a "blik." Religious beliefs are bliks because of the impact they have on every individual's life and the way believers look at their lives that is different to somebody else's.

  2. Our freedom to make ethical choices is an illusion Discuss

    Modern physics seems to maintain that the most basic laws of nature are not deterministic but probabilistic. Einstein said "God does not play dice" but is apparently wrong. Ted Honderich also agreed that since everything is physically determined, there is no choice and so no personal responsibility.

  1. Religious language is meaningless, Discuss

    Therefore the statements are meaningful as we know how to falsify them. Basil Mitchell wanted to show how religious statements are meaningful even if they are not straight forward to verify or falsify.

  2. Ethical language is meaningless. Discuss.

    In any situation, Prichard thought that intuition would show which action was right and where our moral obligation lay. He agreed that there was the problem that people?s morals were different, but said that this was because some people had developed their moral thinking further than others.

  1. Discuss the study of Religious Language

    For example ?my watch is broken? and ?I watch the television? the word watch here has two different meanings. In terms of God this means that the word we use to describe him have no real meaning as the nature of god is so different from the nature of humanity.

  2. Explain what a study of Religious Experience may reveal about the nature of God. ...

    Lastly, ?passivity? is another feature of a religious experience. Having undergone this unusual experience, it has no alternative explanation but God. The recipient may feel that they are ?taken over by a superior power? (Cole). At the Toronto blessing people were overcome by something they believed was the Holy Spirit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work