• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the contributions that two of the following may make to a study of religious language

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(i) Examine the contributions that two of the following may make to a study of religious language. The basic question behind the religious language debate is 'what can be said about god?' The religious language debate is not concerned with whether or not god actually exists, or what god is like. There are a lot of contributions to religious language and different approaches by a lot of different philosophers they are only concerned with working out whether or not religious language means anything. On one side of the debate you have the centuries old tradition of religious believers who believe that you can speak and write about god, because is actually reality, but then on the other hand you have the logical positivists and those that they influenced who claim that statements about god have no meaning because they don't actually related to anything that is real. The myth is one of the most complex types of symbolic language since it incorporates symbols, metaphors and models. When people come to speak about myths its usually to say that something is untrue. However a modern understanding of this sees that myths as giving an insight into human experiences, some theologians have chose to interpret religious statements and texts as myths. ...read more.

Middle

He explains that a word such as 'perfect' when applied to a created being has a different meaning to when it is applied to God; it is not being used univocally. This is because we understand God to be perfect which is what Aquinas explains to be analogy. This is contrasted to Tillich's starting point as he explains that it is through metaphors and symbols. Aquinas rejects the use of univocal and equivocal language to talk about God; instead he uses analogy which is basically a comparison between two things in which the first simpler thing is used to explain the second more complex thing which is in some way similar. This means analogy relies on the fact there is some point of comparison which links the two things. Analogy can be used to describe God because he is revealed through Creation meaning there is some point of comparison between God and the world, as most believe that god was the creator of the world. There is then analogy of attribution which means words such as just and good may be applied to God as well as human beings. ...read more.

Conclusion

For Stevenson, ethical statements are based upon firm, justifiable beliefs about the world and the way in which it should work, and therefore are meaningful. We disapprove of the Holocaust murders not just because they are not to our taste but because we have firm, justifiable beliefs about human dignity and worth. Although Flew provoked a debate by stating that religious language is only meaningful in so far as it can be falsified. What he meant by this is that often religious statements are qualified to the point that they lose their meaning. Another way of expressing this could be by saying that when people make religious assertions they add the rider 'yes but... .' this seemed unsatisfactory to Flew a d he concluded that 'to assert something is to deny something else. An assertion which does not rules out anything, but rather is compatible with an conceivable state of affairs, does not disappear to assert anything either' Although there are a lot of arguments towards the fact that religious language is meaningful and they also give relevant debates towards this which also seem to make sense towards religious language and talking about god and whether it is meaningful or not and it depends on which stance people take on this topic to which argument they may prefer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Religious language is meaningless, Discuss

    Therefore we are using analogies. There have been some critics who argued there has to be a comparative element to any human language used to describe God. This is impossible as God is beyond any true human understanding. Analogies are meaningless in describing God as they are limiting God to what he actually is.

  2. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    scent and makes no sound, a gardener who comes secretly to look after the garden which he loves". Flew's argument is that religious believers act in the same way as the believing explorer. Flew gives the example of saying God loves people, even if disaster happens.

  1. Religious language is meaningless. Discuss.

    He then observes that actually metaphysical claims use the same ordinary language but in a 'odd way'. He said confusion on the meaningful/less- ness of religious language only arises because of a confusing when 'language goes on holiday'. To understand this he formulates this theory of Language Games which asks

  2. "All Religious Language is meaningless"

    in reference to God, as he must have whatever qualities are necessary to inspire and create love, justice and goodness in his creation. Following this there is also the analogy of proportion, God is good at whatever it takes for God to be perfectly good and to be God.

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Anselm's 2nd form of the ontological argument * God is the greatest thing that can be conceived * It is greater to be a necessary being than an contingent being * If God exists as a contingent being, then a greater being can be imagined that can't be conceived not

  2. Ethical language is meaningless. Discuss.

    He called this a ?simple notion? and explained it by saying it is rather like trying to define the colour yellow. We cannot define what the colour yellow is but we can show someone an example. H.A. Prichard also believes in intuitionism.

  1. Discuss the study of Religious Language

    For example ?my watch is broken? and ?I watch the television? the word watch here has two different meanings. In terms of God this means that the word we use to describe him have no real meaning as the nature of god is so different from the nature of humanity.

  2. Philosophers have proved conclusively that religious language is meaningful. Discuss

    understand the idea of God?s omnipotence we can have an insight into God?s power because of our human experience of power. In the 20th century Ian Ramsey developed the theory of analogy. Ramsey refers to ?models? and ?qualifiers?. A model is an analogy to help express something about God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work