• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Freuds challenge to Kants moral argument for the existence of God

Extracts from this document...


Thomas Hurley Philosophy Homework Questions Explain Freud?s challenge to Kant?s moral argument for the existence of God (25 marks) Kant believed that God's existence could only be established through faith, as opposed to logic. He reasoned that in a perfect world, behaving morally should lead to happiness, since happiness should be the natural reward for virtue. However this doesn't happen in our world so he reasoned that there must be something else that motivates people to behave morally, other than the possibility of immediate happiness. He argued people must be subject to an objective sense of obligation, which compels them to behave in a certain way, regardless of the consequences, this being the innate moral understanding. Kant said that our sense of duty was based on reason, whereas Freud argued that our conscience was a product of the unconscious mind or super ego of the human mind. Kant would firstly suggest in his argument that we all have a sense of innate moral awareness, from this we are under obligation to be virtuous meaning we are obliged to be good and morally excellent, this first stage would suggest that our innate moral awareness has come from God. ...read more.


Kant?s moral argument does not postulate that God is necessary for morality but that God is required for morality to achieve its end therefore it is morally necessary to assume the existence of God. However Freud?s notion that religion is an obsessional neurosis suggests postulating the existence of God to guarantee a system of objective moral values is just part of the neurosis. Basically, Freud used the mind to explain how morals occur in our lives in an attempt to disprove Kant?s moral argument for the existence of God. Freud distinguished between three components of the human psyche. The ID being the basic instincts and primitive desires e.g. hunger, lust etc. The Ego is the perceptions of the external that makes us aware of the ?reality principle,? one?s most outward part and personality. And finally the Superego, the unconscious mind which consists of ehe ego-ideal which praises good actions and the conscience which makes you feel guilty for bad actions. All of this science cannot be directly observed but is an excellent theory of moral development; all of this theory tends to undermine everything Kant explained in order to prove God?s existence. ...read more.


There is nothing to say that the Summum Bonum must be the highest good. There is question to whether virtue must be rewarded with happiness and whether this is universal. In the defence of Kant?s argument, morality comes from not just people but also from God. For example, Kant stated that God guaranteed that the Summum Bonum is achievable and that humans are aware of God?s law when they act rationally, God?s law being found through reason. Secondly, the issue with what is considered morally right in one culture may not be considered right in another, thus showing that there is no universal moral law. Even Kant admits that his argument is not proof by saying "my conviction is not logical but moral certainty". Lastly is the issue regarding the challenges that Freud?s argument raised, his claim that religion is an obsessional neurosis is damaging to Kant?s argument simply because the statement can be backed up with scientific and psychological evidence. Religion can easily fall into the category of a mild mental disorder with the symptoms of obsession and insecurities. There are very few strengths and many weaknesses to the statement above in leading Kant?s understanding of morality to God. This does not seem like a very convincing statement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Aquinas, for example, says that there cannot be an infinite series of causes.44 They have also asked how can the cosmological argument avoid contradicting itself. If, for example, nothing causes itself how can there be a first cause which does not itself require a cause other than itself?45 Though this could be debated.

  2. Assess the view that conscience is given to us by God.

    coherent, for example Piaget and Kohlberg who state that conscience is the natural development of our moral compass over time.

  1. Conscience is the voice of God - discuss

    It would appear then, that Oskar Schindler was correct in violating Nazi law. The real problem with the situation, however, is that people do not know whether to act through reason to find the 'good', or by instinct given to us by the 'inner voice' of our conscience.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    the way our society functions it is surprising how easy it is to fit it into a model Nietzschian society. Whilst we, the 'dumb masses', congratulate ourselves on creating such a free and liberal society, in reality it is Nietzsche's privileged aristocracy that are making the decisions.

  1. The verification principle offers no real challenge to religious belief. Discuss

    Eg, is a post box red?, can be verified by observing post boxes. By indirectly verifiable Ayer meant a statement that is not directly verifiable or analytic and 'in conjunction with certain other directly verifiable evidence could support it. For example, scientists demonstrated their existence of black holes in space,

  2. Assess the view that conscience is not the voice of God, but is learned?

    He also believed that the conscience is an automatic response, that it 'magisterially exerts itself spontaneously without being consulted' therefore it is something which is not only automatic it is something of authority. Butler saw human nature as hierarchal, at the top he saw the conscience which is linked to

  1. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    For example the world could've been bungled before this system was made. 5) Non-moral God Hume lists unpleasant features of nature such as earthquakes, war and disease and questions how the planning and design could be that of a just God.

  2. Conscience is innate. Discuss

    our reasoning may be flawed which will result in an apparent good rather than a real good. Cardinal John Henry Newman agreed with Aquinas that conscience is the ability to apply moral principles however; this approach was more intuitive than rationalistic like Butler?s.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work