• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory, as it is a philosophical system concerned with conse- quences rather than the motives. Also it is concerned that the happiness of the greatest number should be the result. There are two types of utilitarianism: act and rule utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is developed be Jeremy Bentham and rule utilitarianism is developed by John Stuart Mill. Jeremy Bentham was an English Philosopher who came up with the theory of Utilitarianism. He was a practical man concerned with the social conditions of his day and particularly with the conditions of prisons and hospitals. He wanted to find a moral basis for law that could serve to benefit the whole of society. In 1789 he wrote 'The principles of moral and Legislation' in which he put forward his ethical theory and divided his book into 3 sections: his view on what drove humans and what goodness and badness is all about, Hedonic Calculus and the principle of utility his moral rule. Bentham had believed that human beings are driven by pleasures and pain, 'nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure'. ...read more.

Middle

The theory is subjective and relative and so remains flexible and applicable to the greatest number of people. This means one act might produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number but not in others. It allows moral rules to change from situation to situation. It also looks at consequences, and as most people judge the values of an action based on its outcome, this means that most people can access and use the basic principles. Nevertheless, there are many criticisms arising from act utilitarianism as well. The main issue is that act Utilitarianism allows for brutal and socially unacceptable acts to be classed as 'good' through being performed by the majority. This assumes whatever is useful, it is moral, and therefore it doesn't need any proof to suggest the claim. Additionally, Bentham says good is pleasure, however pleasure would be different for everyone. For example, some people may love classical music and on the other hand there are people who hate classical music as well. Another major issue is that it is not practical to measure every moral decision that we make by using the hedonic calculus. Some moral decisions that we make in our everyday life might have to be sudden, so therefore it is difficult to go through every factors of the hedonic calculus in a short amount of time. ...read more.

Conclusion

The welfare of humans are taken into account while using rule utilitarianism. Also it encourages democracy. However there are some criticisms of rule utilitarianism as well. One of them is that it still permits certain actions of the society, such as slavery, which is classed morally unacceptable, because minority interests are not taken into account. Sir William David Ross commented it as 'single factor', as he says that moral theories don't work because life is too complicated. Also it is difficult to predict the consequences as well. Overall, I believe that both act and rule utilitarianism is beneficial while making a moral decision. When making a moral decision, it is important that you can justify why it is right for you and the society, and these theories are a good way analyse you decision. However sometimes it is not practical to use in real life as these theories need time to think through before acting. When making a decision through act utilitarianism the advantage is that you making the decision to make the most number of people the happiest, but your actions don't count. Moreover using rule utilitarianism you choose an action that is a higher pleasure to benefit you, but that doesn't necessarily mean you are satisfied with your choice like listening to classical music. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The following points would benefit this work: 1.Grammar and spelling need careful attention. Avoid writing in the first person for any academic work unless it clearly requests it. 2. It often helps to use one very clear example throughout the essay, eg. abortion, murder or euthanasia. Using a clear scenario will focus the writer and the reader. 3. Include more commentary from other thinkers, eg. Dennet, Moore, Singer. Dennet gives an example of a Nuclear accident and the greater good.

Marked by teacher Molly Reynolds 07/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Give an account of Kants Ethical Theory

    3 star(s)

    You must have respect for humanity and never use people in a way that you have no regard for their well being and dignity. An example of this is slavery. You must acknowledge that the person has purposes of their own such as desires and choices, you must always treat

  2. Explain Plato's Form of the Good

    the perfect version of unpleasant things such as Death, Disease and Dishonesty. In the world of forms these would be 'perfect', so would be far more devastating. A counter-argument for this is that these things are the absence of other things, so do really exist or need a form.

  1. Explain the difference between Act and rule utilitarianism

    as the charity would help a lot of people, and the least amount of pain as they would not be able to have money to go to the cinema, however over the next following weeks the people may be going cinema and keep having to give to charity as they

  2. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    For Aquinas, what is good is God's purpose for us. This is the objective way of determining our purpose. The subjective way is to look at personal fulfilment, which a Christian may well argue can only be achieved by following the objective goal.

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    A supporter of Aquinas may know he held odd views about astrology. He may therefore concede that many particular events are demonstrably mistaken. But he can also add that this point is utterly irrelevant to the arguments of the second way.

  2. Explain Plato's Theory of Forms

    All material objects are copies or images of some collection of forms; their reality comes only from the forms. Causes, the forms are the causes of all things. (1) They provide the explanation of why any thing is the way it is, and (2)

  1. There are many arguments for and against Utilitarianism and whether it provides an adequate ...

    First of all how can one measure happiness and decide which action would result in the greatest happiness for everyone involved? Then there is the question of scope. How far does someone look in deciding who is involved and who would be affected by the action?

  2. a) Compare and contrast deontological and teleological approaches to ethics. b) Compare and contrast ...

    This means that if someone is doing something but the outcome results in bad consequence, it is still considered to be a moral or not moral action depending the motive of this action; for instance, it he did it for goodwill, it will be concerned an moral action, otherwise if

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work