• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the difference between Act and rule utilitarianism

Extracts from this document...


Religious studies Explain the difference between Act and rule utilitarianism Utilitarianism is described as being either an act or a rule. Act utilitarianism was devised by Jeremy Bentham which he believed human beings were motivated by pleasure and pain and therefore they may do anything which brings out 'the greatest good for the greatest number.' He believed people must measure their actions by using the hedonic calculus as it weighs up the pain and pleasure generated by the available moral actions to find the best possible outcome. However rule utilitarianism is motivated by rules, unlike act, rule believes that it is not the consequence which determines whether an act is right or wrong, however it is the act itself. Mill believed that 'the well being of the individual was of greatest importance and that happiness is most effectively gained when the individual are free to pursue their own ends, subject to the rules that protect the common good of all'. Act utilitarianism does not act on moral rules; the theory allows people to make their own decisions, however the decision should be based on the consequence that the action would produce. ...read more.


In contrast a rule utilitarian would not persistently give up their money for charity each time, they see the good of giving to charity, because a rule is to allow time for leisure, and constantly giving up the money would not be doing so, therefore a rule utilitarian may resolve this problem by carrying extra money in to give to charity and the rest of the money to go cinema. This is because rule utilitarianism is based on acting on rules. Therefore one of the main differences between act and rule utilitarianism is that the rightness or wrongness of an action is based on the act itself and not the outcome of the act, as a result of this rule utilitarianism has a deontological approach. For example if a poor person steals money from a rich person an act utilitarianism would justify this however a rule utilitarian would be against this, as it is against the law to steal and lying does not necessarily bring out the greatest good for everyone. In act utilitarianism the aim is to produce 'the greatest good for the greatest number' this is determined by the use ...read more.


Therefore the difference between act and rule utilitarianism, is that rule utilitarianism is based on rules and following the rules, even if it does not produce the greatest pleasure for the greatest number, as telling the truth instead of lying is good for everyone. Also rule utilitarianism believes that there are 2 types of pleasures, which are higher and lower, and everyone should aim for higher pleasure ' as it is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a satisfied pig.' However in act utilitarianism, Jeremy believed it is best to produce the 'greatest good for the greatest number' by weighing up the pleasure and pain using the hedonic calculus as it would help on deciding what act to do in order to lead to maximum goodness. In rule utilitarianism they believe that people should follow the moral rules as it is for all good, however in act utilitarianism they believe that the act itself determines whether it is right or wrong, however it is the consequence which does so. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how moral decisions should be made according to: Act and Rule utilitarianism

    3 star(s)

    John Stuart Mill was a follower to Bentham; however there were some points in Bentham's theory that made Mill disturbed. Mill raised with Bentham was that it was purely quantitative, in other words it was based purely on the amount of pleasure an action generated.

  2. Explain the main differences between Act and Rule Utilitarianism

    So for example, if you are in a situation where lying would bring about the greatest good then, you should lie. Utilitarians support the view that it is the value of the consequences of the particular act that count, so if breaking the law would lead to the greatest good

  1. What is the most telling objection to Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle?

    People react differently and acting the same way towards two different people will result in two different reactions. Humans are not magnesium strips that combust with starting similarity. Human beings are individuals and no one rule is universal. How can one accurately predict consequences?

  2. Why are justice and integrity problematic for utilitarianism?

    This seems a contradiction in terms. It is for this reason, therefore, which I believe that utilitarianism cannot be considered a realistic principle of morality, when faced with individual integrity and the use of individual experience during the decision making process.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Philisophical Contributions of Nietzsche and Mill to our understanding of ...

    All drives come from a will to power, which is; the drive for freedom and domination over other things. We see it in our daily lives; in every argument there is a striving force for mastery and victory; even in the hierarchical nature of organisations e.g.

  2. Nietzsche and Mill on Conventional Morality

    Nietzsche systematically goes about doing this in the Genealogy on Morals, saying that all morality was an expression of the will, and Conventional Morality an expression of a weak will born of "resentiment" towards the oppression of the strong willed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work