• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that the strengths outweigh the weaknesses.

Extracts from this document...


The Ontological Argument Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that the strengths outweigh the weaknesses. This essay will discuss the Ontological argument for the existence of God and thus conclude whether or not the strengths outweigh the weaknesses. By definition, the Ontological argument is a deductive argument which attempts the method of a priori proof - using intuition and reason alone. The argument examines the concept of God, and states that if we can conceive of the greatest possible being, then it must exist. Throughout the years many philosophers have made argument both for and against the argument. I will discuss the opinions of these various philosophers and thus reach an overall conclusion. Philosopher, St Anselm stated that: 'God is that of which nothing greater can be conceived.' By this, Anselm is saying that God has to be the greatest and best thing to be thought of. This statement is one in which both believers and non believers can relate to (even the 'fool' mentioned in Psalm 14), as if there was a God - by definition He would withhold certain characteristics (such a being a creator) which would make Him most excellent. ...read more.


We can use this to test the statement: 'God's existence is necessary.' Firstly, we question whether or not this statement could maybe be true - However, if God's existence is necessary then how can a necessity become a possibility/maybe true? - Calling this statement as 'maybe true' is only illogical. We then question whether the statement can be 'no' but, a statement is only ever 'no' if it contains contradiction, for example, 'no one in the world should lie except me.' If no one should lie - neither should I as I am a part of the world, this thus makes the statement incorrect. However the statement: 'God's existence is necessary,' contains no contradictions so 'no' has been ruled out. Therefore we are left with 'yes' and so Malcolm states that God must exist. The final argument for the ontological argument comes from philosopher Platinga, who devised a modal form. He states that firstly, it is proposed that a being has maximal excellence in a given possible world - if and only if it is omnipotent, omniscient and wholly good in that world. ...read more.


Furthermore, in response to Malcolm's argument of 'yes, no or maybe' statements philosopher, Davies goes on to suggest that the use of the word 'is' has been used innocently. This is because 'is 'can only be used in two ways. Firstly, to define something, for example: there IS the Queen and secondly, to explain the existence of something for example, there is a thing as a vampire. Malcolm assumes that: 'GOD is necessary, therefore God is.' However, Davies disagrees as he believes the word 'is' has not been used to describe or explain anything - therefore it has been used incorrectly and therefore does not withstand logic and reason. In conclusion, It is apparent that there are far more weaknesses than strengths. I believe that the above stated strengths are extremely weak. For example, Norman Malcolm's argument is purely based on play on words. Therefore it is easy to conclude that the argument may strengthen the faith of a believer, however, it will fail convince an atheist. The main reason for this being that there are far more weakness to strengths - the few strengths that have been portrayed are also extremely weak. ?? ?? ?? ?? Uzma Tariq 13.06 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God.

    4 star(s)

    He did not address the idea of whether design arguments are logical, as Hume had done. Mill suggested that if we look at the world and the rules which govern it, then we see cruelty, violence and unnecessary violence. Hume argued that if the world has been deliberately designed, then it indicates something very different from a loving God.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Aquinas answers this from the principle of *ex nihilo, nihil fit*15 - if something comes out of existence, it cannot come back into existence. Once something ceases to exist, it cannot suddenly exist again. Our sense perceptions and experience tell us that something exists, something is there, and therefore everything has not ever gone out of existence.

  1. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    prior to passing on this power and prior to the object receiving it and hence moving (effect). Therefore, he argued, there must have been a first (or prime) mover that begins that motion, whom itself is self-caused. Being able to link the argument to real-life situations to prove a connection between cause and effect again adds to the arguments believability.

  2. Analyze the distinctive features of the Ontological Argument

    Even if we could perceive of perfection that would not mean that God necessarily existed. There are problems with the definition of perfection, which is subjective and there are problems with saying that existence is part of perfection. Saying one exists does not add any value to the understanding of one as Kant argued.

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    the ontological; ontological arguments offer no a posteriori evidence for the existence of God, it would thus be logical to assume that they can never offer definitive proof to the existence of God - This is true, of course, unless one accepts a platonic idea of knowledge, in which we

  2. Compare and contrast the contributions of Descartes and Humes on the issue of the ...

    Telos is Greek word for 'end' or 'purpose' The argument infers a designer from the occurrence of order and regularity in the world. Order regularity and purpose are seen as marks of design; the argument concludes that God must be the source of that design.

  1. Conscience is the voice of God - discuss

    towards whom we feel guilty, and according to him it is God. His theory holds because it creates a possible reason for irrational guilt. However, it separates God from the human's ethical reasoning, only as a cosmic, silent disciplinarian, and more fundamentally it fails to consider that our guilt may also consciously be felt towards the those here on earth.

  2. Deontology has many strengths but it is justifiable to reject it. Clarify and assess ...

    This challenge casts doubt on whether following the Divine Command Theory is really how God wants us to live. In regards to practicality, this form of deontology is not workable for atheists who, as they do not believe in God, see no reason to follow His commandments, and therefore do not find this argument persuasive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work