• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that the strengths outweigh the weaknesses.

Extracts from this document...


The Ontological Argument Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God. Comment on the claim that the strengths outweigh the weaknesses. This essay will discuss the Ontological argument for the existence of God and thus conclude whether or not the strengths outweigh the weaknesses. By definition, the Ontological argument is a deductive argument which attempts the method of a priori proof - using intuition and reason alone. The argument examines the concept of God, and states that if we can conceive of the greatest possible being, then it must exist. Throughout the years many philosophers have made argument both for and against the argument. I will discuss the opinions of these various philosophers and thus reach an overall conclusion. Philosopher, St Anselm stated that: 'God is that of which nothing greater can be conceived.' By this, Anselm is saying that God has to be the greatest and best thing to be thought of. This statement is one in which both believers and non believers can relate to (even the 'fool' mentioned in Psalm 14), as if there was a God - by definition He would withhold certain characteristics (such a being a creator) which would make Him most excellent. ...read more.


We can use this to test the statement: 'God's existence is necessary.' Firstly, we question whether or not this statement could maybe be true - However, if God's existence is necessary then how can a necessity become a possibility/maybe true? - Calling this statement as 'maybe true' is only illogical. We then question whether the statement can be 'no' but, a statement is only ever 'no' if it contains contradiction, for example, 'no one in the world should lie except me.' If no one should lie - neither should I as I am a part of the world, this thus makes the statement incorrect. However the statement: 'God's existence is necessary,' contains no contradictions so 'no' has been ruled out. Therefore we are left with 'yes' and so Malcolm states that God must exist. The final argument for the ontological argument comes from philosopher Platinga, who devised a modal form. He states that firstly, it is proposed that a being has maximal excellence in a given possible world - if and only if it is omnipotent, omniscient and wholly good in that world. ...read more.


Furthermore, in response to Malcolm's argument of 'yes, no or maybe' statements philosopher, Davies goes on to suggest that the use of the word 'is' has been used innocently. This is because 'is 'can only be used in two ways. Firstly, to define something, for example: there IS the Queen and secondly, to explain the existence of something for example, there is a thing as a vampire. Malcolm assumes that: 'GOD is necessary, therefore God is.' However, Davies disagrees as he believes the word 'is' has not been used to describe or explain anything - therefore it has been used incorrectly and therefore does not withstand logic and reason. In conclusion, It is apparent that there are far more weaknesses than strengths. I believe that the above stated strengths are extremely weak. For example, Norman Malcolm's argument is purely based on play on words. Therefore it is easy to conclude that the argument may strengthen the faith of a believer, however, it will fail convince an atheist. The main reason for this being that there are far more weakness to strengths - the few strengths that have been portrayed are also extremely weak. ?? ?? ?? ?? Uzma Tariq 13.06 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the design argument for the existence of God.

    4 star(s)

    He did not address the idea of whether design arguments are logical, as Hume had done. Mill suggested that if we look at the world and the rules which govern it, then we see cruelty, violence and unnecessary violence. Hume argued that if the world has been deliberately designed, then it indicates something very different from a loving God.

  2. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    *Principle of Plentitude* at this juncture, which states that if something is a real possibility, then given an infinite amount of time, it should happen. Real possibilities show up.13 It is a real possibility that if everything is contingent, everything could go out of existence at once, given that time is infinite at any point, such as now.

  1. Examine the major features of the Ontological argument for the existence of God.

    Descartes used and example of triangles saying that if a triangles angles add to 180 degrees as that is what is included in the definition of a triangle, so he argues that God must have existence as a characteristic of himself.

  2. Examine the main strengths and weakness of the Cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    Plato identified that motion, causes and effects are linked. All around we are able to see the link between cause and effect, such as moving an object. Plato said that, logically speaking, there must always be power to produce motion (or a cause)

  1. The Ontological Argument - Critique

    no greater can be conceived, could be thought of as a common truth, and any conclusions drawn from this concept could be held as truth. However, even if we were to take a platonic view of the world, we would still have to deny Kant's second criticism.

  2. Outline the ontological argument as presented by Anselm and Descartes.

    He believed that existence was not a property essential to greatness or perfection. If something is perfect and has properties A, B and C, is it any more perfect if it has A, B, C and exists? Isn't it the same 'something' we are thinking of in both cases?

  1. The ontological argument of Anselm and Gaunilo's response.

    This is a flaw within the ontological argument in that it would allow the creation of almost anything. If one was to suggest the greatest conceivable cup of coffee, that cup of coffee must exist, regardless of the fact that there is no evidence to support this fact.

  2. Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

    Reductio ad absurdum is a method of reasoning used by Anselm in the Proslogion which aims to demonstrate the truth of something by reducing to absurdity the opposite of what is being proved, Anselm uses this method to reduce to absurdity the opposite of his conclusion, this being that God does not exist.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work