• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Plato and Aristotle offer highly contrasting definitions of the soul

Extracts from this document...


) Plato and Aristotle offer highly contrasting definitions of the soul with Plato?s being very similar to the current, excepted idea of a soul is whilst Aristotle?s concept is something that isn?t thought of when considering the soul by the majority. Plato?s soul links in with the Judaeo-Christian belief on the soul as he suggests that it is eternal and a separate entity entirely from the body that lives on after the bodies? death. It is used by Christians to tell of how we are judged after death whilst its main importance to Plato?s theories is that it describes a way in which the world of appearances and the world of forms are linked together and how these perfect concepts are viewed by us. ...read more.


Aristotle on the other hand tells that the body and soul are interdependent, part of a single unity, and rather than the soul being immortal it will in fact die with the body as unlike Plato?s suggestion of the body and soul being separate Aristotle conveys them to be aspects of the same thing so without the body the soul cannot live on. He describes the body as matter and the soul as form. The soul is the function and organisation of the body; it is like the life force of a living being. The soul gives the opportunity to change potentiality into actuality; if the body is not actualised then it is considered dead and would just be unformed matter. ...read more.


An eternal soul would have to live outside of the universe which is limited by time and space which makes linking the concepts of the body and soul, the world of appearances and forms and a time bound universe and an eternal space harder to conceive of and therefore truly consider. There would have to be a limited link as a constant one is made impossible by the universe not sharing in the eternality, this raises the question of how can two things be intimately linked when one shall continue for eternity whilst the other will cease to exist. The logical and conceivable concepts of Aristotle?s views allow me to accept them as reasonable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Plato versus Aristotle on well being

    "when the whole mind accepts the leadership of the philosophical part, and there is no internal conflict, then each part can do its job and be moral in everything it does, and in particular it can enjoy its own pleasures and thus reaps as much benefit from pleasure as is possible" (586)

  2. Body soul destinction

    Although Dawkins theory is based on empirical evidence and it has been proved that certain genes decide certain parts of a persons characteristics there is yet no proof to suggest that genes make up the whole of a someone's personality and therefore it could be seen that there may be something else, this may be the soul.

  1. Evaluate plato and aristotle on well being

    Justice in the soul can only be present when the tripartite elements are in accurate harmony; when reason is ruling over spirit and spirit is controlling desires or appetites; wisdom can be seen to represent the rational part of the soul and courage parallels the spirited part of the soul with discipline existing in controlling desires.

  2. Plato & The Soul

    an entity of rational and self reflective thought demonstrates its affiliation with a simple and immutable world; showing that the two are distinct. However Plato does not explore the criticisms of this argument that just because an entity portrays an affiliation, does not necessarily require it to be as that which it affiliates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work