• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The founder of situation ethics, Joseph Fletcher felt that the individual should be of paramount concern and that each ethical situation should be judged in its own context.Fletcher wanted to preserve the Christian principle of agape love

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(A) What may be said in favour of situation ethics? [7] This essay shall discuss what may be said in favour of situation ethics. Firstly it shall discuss scholars that favour it and why. Secondly it shall discuss the features that situation ethics posses that makes it favourable to others. Finally it shall analyse the effect of situation ethics and why people favour to apply it. The founder of situation ethics, Joseph Fletcher felt that the individual should be of paramount concern and that each ethical situation should be judged in its own context. Fletcher wanted to preserve the Christian principle of agape love. Fletcher therefore proposed an anapaestic calculus and followed, "love your neighbour as yourself." Fletcher believed that only "one things is instrinclly good - love itself" Therefore a person following situation ethics would take each situation as it came and they would come to a judgment of the situation as responding by assessing the most compassionate option available. Fletcher claimed that Justice is only love in action. Agape love can also be seen to collapse into utilitarianism, "the greater good for the greater number" where "number" is replaced with "love" Paul Tillich said, "The law of love is the ultimate law because it is the negation of law, it is absolute because it concerns everything concrete. ...read more.

Middle

Even though situation ethics revolves around the one principle of Christian love, it can be argued that in fact It is going against the Christian Church and some of their teachings, because it is so individualistic it suggest that the decision of the individual is far more important than the church. Actions are not as dissimilar as Fletcher suggests, situation ethics can justify any situation and defend it, when others would argue that the action is morally wrong. Such as committing adultery, the adulterer may claim that it was the most loving thing to do because they gained pleasure and so did the other individual from his course of action in the end. However the partner would suffer intolerable heart ache because of her partner committing adultery, this shows that one person may believe their course of actions is the most loving thing to do, however from another individuals view, this is not at all the most loving thing to do. The negative effects of applying situation ethics : - for any individual it is not easy to determine the consequences of actions and the long lasting negative effect it could have on another individual. ...read more.

Conclusion

It appears that humans tend to pollute Agape love by the fact that they can be selfish at times, situation ethicists may choose the most loving decision, however they - like all humans - are likely to take into account the effect that this may have upon them and if they would benefit from this decision. Dacher Keltner from the university of California says, "In my seminars I asked my undergraduates to complete the following cause, "humans are..." and 70% of their responses referred to some form of selfishness." which clearly demonstrates that humans themselves are fully aware of their actions and that many can be selfish at times. Therefore in conclusion -situation ethics is an unacceptable ethical theory because for any individual it is not easy to determine the consequences of actions and the long lasting negative effect it could have on another individual even if they believe that they have chosen the most loving course of action. Situation ethics appears to be unacceptable because it has far too many flaws, such as it does not take into account the human nature, and different interpretation in situations. Fletcher - the founder of this ethical theory actually provided one single law that can be easily broken as another, because the absolute principle, "act situationally - act with the greatest love" is in fact a law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the main ethical principle of Christianity.

    The idea is that when someone is making a decision, that person has to consider the consequence of the action and to see whether there is a greatest balance of happiness instead of unhappiness. Therefore a right action is the one with the best consequences.

  2. Kant's theory of Ethics

    ends in themselves. 'In this kingdom nothing conflicts with reason, and the rational being is both subject and sovereign of the law which there obtains' (Scruton, page 71) The key strengths of Kant's theory of ethics are as follows. Firstly, it is a deontological argument that does not concern itself

  1. What is Christian ethics?

    Others believe the Bible contains God's words handed down directly to humans. This makes these writings divine and makes them the highest authority - their rules and codes are absolute. The New Testament has particular importance for Christians because it records the teachings of Jesus, whom Christians regard as God's Son sent to earth to save humanity.

  2. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    Many criticized Catholics for ignoring other rules that suited them but sticking to the rules about homosexuality because they didn't like the idea. In his book, "Ethical Studies", David Bowie wrote "The bible condemns hypocrisy and greed, but no one died at the stake in medieval times for these offences, while homosexuals perished."

  1. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    This is an example of Jesus demonstrating love, passion and integrity and showing the weakness of using absolute laws as a meaning of judging individual moral cases. Fletcher further observed that "Bultmann [A German theologian] was correct is saying that Jesus had no ethics if we accept, as I do

  2. Evaluate the claim that conscience is a reliable guide to ethical decision making.

    While the methodology of an acquired conscience differs, the basic premise - that conscience is developed during childhood, and is developed by largely universal experiences - remains the same. From this we could deduce, particularly from Piaget's view, that while conscience is not pre-ordained it is a natural extension of the human condition.

  1. Explain the approach of Situation Ethics to moral decision making.

    This means that Fletcher rejected starting with a set of rules and deducing what should be done in a particular situation. Like Jesus with the Pharisees, he rejected a legalistic approach to morality. Fletcher, however, did not reject the usefulness of rules.

  2. The Ethics of Stealing

    The rightness or wrongfulness of an act is determined by its ?utility? or usefulness. In this case a Utilitarianist would feel that the ?utility? of the act would make it right.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work