• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The founder of situation ethics, Joseph Fletcher felt that the individual should be of paramount concern and that each ethical situation should be judged in its own context.Fletcher wanted to preserve the Christian principle of agape love

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(A) What may be said in favour of situation ethics? [7] This essay shall discuss what may be said in favour of situation ethics. Firstly it shall discuss scholars that favour it and why. Secondly it shall discuss the features that situation ethics posses that makes it favourable to others. Finally it shall analyse the effect of situation ethics and why people favour to apply it. The founder of situation ethics, Joseph Fletcher felt that the individual should be of paramount concern and that each ethical situation should be judged in its own context. Fletcher wanted to preserve the Christian principle of agape love. Fletcher therefore proposed an anapaestic calculus and followed, "love your neighbour as yourself." Fletcher believed that only "one things is instrinclly good - love itself" Therefore a person following situation ethics would take each situation as it came and they would come to a judgment of the situation as responding by assessing the most compassionate option available. Fletcher claimed that Justice is only love in action. Agape love can also be seen to collapse into utilitarianism, "the greater good for the greater number" where "number" is replaced with "love" Paul Tillich said, "The law of love is the ultimate law because it is the negation of law, it is absolute because it concerns everything concrete. ...read more.

Middle

Even though situation ethics revolves around the one principle of Christian love, it can be argued that in fact It is going against the Christian Church and some of their teachings, because it is so individualistic it suggest that the decision of the individual is far more important than the church. Actions are not as dissimilar as Fletcher suggests, situation ethics can justify any situation and defend it, when others would argue that the action is morally wrong. Such as committing adultery, the adulterer may claim that it was the most loving thing to do because they gained pleasure and so did the other individual from his course of action in the end. However the partner would suffer intolerable heart ache because of her partner committing adultery, this shows that one person may believe their course of actions is the most loving thing to do, however from another individuals view, this is not at all the most loving thing to do. The negative effects of applying situation ethics : - for any individual it is not easy to determine the consequences of actions and the long lasting negative effect it could have on another individual. ...read more.

Conclusion

It appears that humans tend to pollute Agape love by the fact that they can be selfish at times, situation ethicists may choose the most loving decision, however they - like all humans - are likely to take into account the effect that this may have upon them and if they would benefit from this decision. Dacher Keltner from the university of California says, "In my seminars I asked my undergraduates to complete the following cause, "humans are..." and 70% of their responses referred to some form of selfishness." which clearly demonstrates that humans themselves are fully aware of their actions and that many can be selfish at times. Therefore in conclusion -situation ethics is an unacceptable ethical theory because for any individual it is not easy to determine the consequences of actions and the long lasting negative effect it could have on another individual even if they believe that they have chosen the most loving course of action. Situation ethics appears to be unacceptable because it has far too many flaws, such as it does not take into account the human nature, and different interpretation in situations. Fletcher - the founder of this ethical theory actually provided one single law that can be easily broken as another, because the absolute principle, "act situationally - act with the greatest love" is in fact a law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Practical Questions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Practical Questions essays

  1. Explain the main ethical principle of Christianity.

    The idea is that when someone is making a decision, that person has to consider the consequence of the action and to see whether there is a greatest balance of happiness instead of unhappiness. Therefore a right action is the one with the best consequences.

  2. RE euthanasia for and against

    Hooker argues that mistakes could be made. He disputes euthanasia by saying, "after a person has died, it would become apparent that the diagnosis was incorrect"20. Hooker suggests with the intention of expressing the view that not all doctors will get a diagnosis exact and the consequences could be dire.

  1. Kant's theory of Ethics

    with the consequences of an action but rather the motivation behind that action. Therefore as long as you have a good will behind your action it is morally worthwhile if it brings about good or bad consequences. This strength make Kant's theory more favourable as it may take away the

  2. Examine the key features of situation ethics, and the main criticisms of it, and ...

    In the book Honest To God, Robinson wrote "It is not a question of 'Those whom God hath joined together let no man put asunder': no man could if he tried. For marriage is not merely indissoluble: it is indelible".

  1. We are free to make ethical decisions, discuss

    According to a soft determinist, when the individual is the cause of his or her actions, he or she is still said to act freely. According to this we can do what we want do without influences both external and those to do with genetics, and character.

  2. “Without real freedom there would be no ethical decisions to make,” Discuss.

    The former, being developed largely as the result of personal experiences and a product of a social environment, limits the choices you have by defining the way your mind works, but it only works to make some choices more likely than others and is not in anyway thought to restrict freedom.

  1. Examine the differences in ethical and Christian views concerning homosexuality

    agree with, however, as times change many Catholics are actually considering these alternative interpretations to meet with the ever changing ethical views of society. There were many others to follow Macquarrie and Childress in re-interpreting the Bible and its rules on homosexuality.

  2. Explain the approach of Situation Ethics to moral decision making.

    This means that Fletcher rejected starting with a set of rules and deducing what should be done in a particular situation. Like Jesus with the Pharisees, he rejected a legalistic approach to morality. Fletcher, however, did not reject the usefulness of rules.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work