• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you think that designer babies would be improving on Nature? - Discuss

Extracts from this document...


Title Do you think that designer babies would be improving on Nature? - Discuss Improving on nature is basically when we, as a society, interfere with the natural process of nature e.g. plant growth. A present day example of when we have been trying to improve on nature is Genetically Modified Foods, a topic that is currently the subject of a lot of debate. The people who are entrusted to improve on nature, the scientists, do it with the intention of giving us a better quality of life. The latest major idea to come from the world of science on how we can improve on nature is the concept of genetically modified embryos, or so-called "designer babies". It is reported that scientists are coming very close to having the technology to manipulate and screen embryos so that any diseases could be eliminated or immunised against. The technology could even be used to manipulate eye colour and other characteristics of an embryo, even gender. When we began our class debating and research of designer babies, I immediately took an extremely conservative and one-sided outlook on the topic. I believed that any thought of genetically engineering babies was sick and that there was no way we could put our future generations at risk by making them into some mad scientist's warped experiment, no matter how good were the intentions about wiping out disease were. ...read more.


Another big issue for people who are against genetically engineered embryos is that there is no legislation in place to state who would be able to access genetically modifying technology if it ever became available. At the minute, there is great debate about whether IVF should be put on the NHS, yet there has been no foresight in parliament to debate legislation on designer babies. People against designer babies have taken heart in the fact that research into embryos has been slowed down by this law. No live embryo may be kept alive, beyond 14 days after fertilisation nor may it be used as a research subject beyond that time. Another debate that is linked to the designer babies debate is the Nature, Nurture debate. This focuses on whether people's genetic make-up is the reason for different people doing different things e.g. taking drugs or committing crimes. Or whether it is the environment people grow up in, that shapes them e.g. if you grow up where drugs are prevalent, are you more likely to take drugs? People in favour of genetic modification are more inclined to agree with the nature aspect of this debate, as this would add more bulk to the argument in favour of genetic engineering, because the technology would be able to manipulate the genes and eradicate things such as addiction. People who disagree with genetic modification would agree with the nurture debate as it undermines the nature debate. ...read more.


In conclusion, I agree with many of these aspects, to an extent. My fundamental view is that we would be hypocritical of our laws and values if we did not allow our doctors, who would need to be specially trained, to use this technology to save lives and only save lives. I believe that if we allow this technology to spiral out of control, i.e. genetically engineered looks and personality, it would be a disaster for our society. I also think that allowing scientists to encourage parents to design their "a la carte" babies would also be catastrophic. It is essential that legislation is drafted and that detailed, informed debate takes place immediately otherwise we could end up with a human spare parts industry or a warped Utopia, like Brave New World. The voice of history and literature should not be ignored as they can serve as warnings to the governments today. The attempted Swedish eugenics of the 1970's is only today fully coming to light and Brave New World is so frighteningly accurate it chills my spine thinking about it. I believe strongly that depending on the choices of our governments now, we are either on the verge of a discovery so great it could change human life for the better like never before, or, if the wrong choices over legislation and the extent to which genetic engineering can go are made, then we could, over an amazingly short period of time, initiate our own self destruction. By Barry O' Kelly 11J ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Nature vs. Nurture - And its affect on intelligence, personality, and behavior

    4 star(s)

    "Genetic variations that influence dopamine and Serotonin receptors in the brain may cause some babies (and adults) to be bolder or more curious than others." (Reuters, Pg. 1) Some babies, for example will attempt to climb things such as stairs or even descend them, while others will be more cautious and therefore will not attempt anything risky.

  2. patterns of growth and development

    The second stage is called the Pre - operational stage which occurs around the ages of 2 - 7 years. A child can represent reality to themselves through the use of symbols and they also understand the difference in the past and future.

  1. Investigation as to whether the aspect of a wall affects the growth of lichens

    This is called isidia. However many lichen fungi appear to reproduce sexually in a manner typically of fingi. The thallus of most lichens differ greatly to that of their constituent alga and fungus and may resemble simple plants in form and growth.

  2. Genetic engineering - Designer babies

    Cloning can also be used to create parts suitable for organ transplantation into humans. For purposes such as these I, and many others believe that genetic engineering could be a fantastic new breakthrough in the medical world, and so should be researched further, But How far can genetic engineering be taken?

  1. An Investigation into the effect of flow rate on the size of Gammarus pulex

    Barbed wire 2 3 6 Be careful while walking Animals 2 2 4 Do not go near them. Just ignore and carry on working D-net 2 1 2 Hold the net upright to avoid any accidents. Strangers 2 2 4 Just concentrate on my own work, stay in a group

  2. Nature Vs Nurture

    As such, people who have a genetic propensity to intelligence and a highly stimulating infancy will become most intelligent, while those who have a lower genetic propensity to intelligence may still demonstrate high IQ through a highly structured intervention program.

  1. Investigating the colour variation of Littorina littoralis and their abundance across the upper, middle ...

    This is the principle of Darwin's theory on 'Natural Selection;. Similarly, those organisms with undesirable phenotypes will have lowered chances of survival, and so have decreased chances of reproduction. This means that, if the organism dies without reproducing, its undesirable phenotype is removed from the gene pool.

  2. Genetic Modification

    and a normal band of 19 kD (arrow) in two controls (denominated C), and in the mother of patient II-2/LG61. Autosomal recessive LGMDs are a genetically heterogeneous group of disorders that affect mainly the proximal musculature. There are at least eight genetically distinct forms of this disease: LGMD 2A2H.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work