• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8

# I am doing an investigation in to how much a metre rule bends when one end is clamped to a table and a varied load is attached to the other end that hangs off the table, thus bending the rule.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tom Owens

Set 5

Physics Sc1

The Plan:

Simple procedure:

I am doing an investigation in to how much a metre rule bends when one end is clamped to a table and a varied load is attached to the other end that hangs off the table, thus bending the rule. I shall take relevant readings that I shall repeat three times and record the results in a table.

Hypothesis:

I hypothesise that the greater the load attached to the metre rule, the more the metre rule will be inclined to bend. There are two reasons for this. The first is because ‘the extension is directly proportional to the stretching force.’ This is Hooke’s Law but cannot only be applied to springs, but also to metal wires, girders in bridges, but more importantly anything where the extension will be affected by the load. To see if my prediction is correct I will experiment, and obtain results using Hooke’s Law.He found that the extension is proportional to the downward force acting on the spring.The formula that represents that is:. This is where F = force in Newton’s, k = spring constant and x = extension in metres. I also believe that the amount that my metre rule will bend shall be quantitative. By this I mean that if the load doubles, so will the extension. I believe that if I put on three times the load, I will get three times the extension (and so on until eventually the metre rule cannot hold any more weights and snaps.) This shows that the extension is directly proportional to the stretching force. Therefore I will choose the following loads: 100g, 200g, 300g, 400g, 500g, 600g, 700g, 800g, 900g, and 1000g.

Middle

Variables:

The manipulated variable, which I identified, will be the weight of the load. This variable will constantly change so that I can see how much the rule bends with a different mass on it each time. The results (which I shall repeat in order to create a fair test and identify any anomalies which I can later repeat) can then be recorded in a table, which can then be converted in to graphs. I hope that by repeating my readings, I can further prove that my hypothesis will hopefully be correct. Repeat readings will also enable me to work out the averages of my readings and in so doing create more accurate graphs.

The dependent variable will be the length of metre rule that hangs over the table. This shall remain constant throughout the experiment. I shall have 20cm of the rule on the table and 80cm of the rule hanging off the table. Otherwise, if we altered the load and the length of the rule hanging over the table we would not have a fair test as we could not claim that load is directly proportional to the extension because as the metre rule would hang at different lengths over the table, the extension would vary even with the same load on the rule. This would flaw the experiment, as there would be no point in investigating how extension varies with load if we could not tell due to the fact that the rule was hanging at different lengths over the table. I shall control the length of the metre rule over the table by clamping one end to a table with a G-clamp, thus knowing it can’t alter and keeping this variable the same throughout the experiment.

I identified two other variables.

Conclusion

The only other further work I could have done to provide additional and relevant evidence would have been to ensure that my hypothesis was proved correct by taking a greater range of evidence e.g. a greater range of masses to add to the metre rule. This would have allowed me to create more relevant and correct readings that could have gone towards backing up my hypothesis. Any anomalies would have been more easily identified and I would have created a greater range of results. Also, I could have had different amounts of the rule on the table e.g. 30cm on the table and 70cm hanging off the table. This would have enabled me to compare the repeated results to see if the same theory emerged and to prove that it was not a fluke. It would not matter that the extensions differed, provided the theory still remained the same. This was however unnecessary as I have repeated my readings enough times, so that one theory stood up above them all, to eventually prove my hypothesis thoroughly correct.

(3593 words)

Acknowledgements:

Physics For You - pages 114 and 74

The Internet – www.studentcentral.co.uk

Longman’s Student Revision Guide

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology essays

1. ## Determine the value of 'g', where 'g' is the acceleration due to gravity.

Repeating the experiment 3 or more times and taking averages can decrease the random error. For every equipment I have used for this experiment had a range and an error which are written in the apparatus list. My error in the extension is the error in the meter ruler and

2. ## I am investigating the relationship between extension and load, therefore testing Hooke's Law.

Observation: Results I obtained the following results: Weight (N) Mass (grams) Length1 (cm) Length2 (cm) Length3 (cm) Average Extension (cm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 50 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.7 1.0 100 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 1.5 150 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 2.0 200 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0

1. ## How is the sag of a bridge affected by the load applied at it's ...

This way it is easier to get the average of the results. L = length B = breadth D = thickness E = modules of elasticity/ Youngs modules Results: After completing the experiment I recorded my results in a result table: Sag (mm)

2. ## What factors affect the period of a Baby Bouncer?

The spring constant can be calculated from a load-extension graph, such as Graph(iii). The gradient of the line of best fit gives the spring constant. Thus, the spring constant (k) = 1 / gradient In the case of Graph (iii), k = 1 / (?

1. ## Resonance in a Closed Air Column Investigation.

In a standing wave, produced by the closed air column, the same number of cycles are covered per second except the incident wave starts as a crest and the reflected wave begins as a trough. This represents identical frequencies just like the pushing frequency matches the frequency of the swing.

2. ## Stretching Springs/Hookes Law.

We will also try to keep the table clean to make it safe and we will also remove all bags or put them under the table or hang them up just in case so no one falls over. We will also remove all stools so that no one will fall over and we will put them under the tables.

1. ## An investigation into the stretching of materials

Hooke's law does not apply to elastic bands as it does to springs, Graph of weight against extension for some different materials � The length of the band will affect the experiment and create a difference in the results, because a longer band will be able to hold more weight,

2. ## An experiment to investigate and determine how rubber behaves when tension forces are applied ...

so, I could only come up with the data provided above, but I do think that it will be sufficient enough to use. I also made a change in the way I set my data table out form my template in the method.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to