• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8

# I am doing an investigation in to how much a metre rule bends when one end is clamped to a table and a varied load is attached to the other end that hangs off the table, thus bending the rule.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tom Owens

Set 5

Physics Sc1

The Plan:

Simple procedure:

I am doing an investigation in to how much a metre rule bends when one end is clamped to a table and a varied load is attached to the other end that hangs off the table, thus bending the rule. I shall take relevant readings that I shall repeat three times and record the results in a table.

Hypothesis:

I hypothesise that the greater the load attached to the metre rule, the more the metre rule will be inclined to bend. There are two reasons for this. The first is because ‘the extension is directly proportional to the stretching force.’ This is Hooke’s Law but cannot only be applied to springs, but also to metal wires, girders in bridges, but more importantly anything where the extension will be affected by the load. To see if my prediction is correct I will experiment, and obtain results using Hooke’s Law.He found that the extension is proportional to the downward force acting on the spring.The formula that represents that is:. This is where F = force in Newton’s, k = spring constant and x = extension in metres. I also believe that the amount that my metre rule will bend shall be quantitative. By this I mean that if the load doubles, so will the extension. I believe that if I put on three times the load, I will get three times the extension (and so on until eventually the metre rule cannot hold any more weights and snaps.) This shows that the extension is directly proportional to the stretching force. Therefore I will choose the following loads: 100g, 200g, 300g, 400g, 500g, 600g, 700g, 800g, 900g, and 1000g.

Middle

Variables:

The manipulated variable, which I identified, will be the weight of the load. This variable will constantly change so that I can see how much the rule bends with a different mass on it each time. The results (which I shall repeat in order to create a fair test and identify any anomalies which I can later repeat) can then be recorded in a table, which can then be converted in to graphs. I hope that by repeating my readings, I can further prove that my hypothesis will hopefully be correct. Repeat readings will also enable me to work out the averages of my readings and in so doing create more accurate graphs.

The dependent variable will be the length of metre rule that hangs over the table. This shall remain constant throughout the experiment. I shall have 20cm of the rule on the table and 80cm of the rule hanging off the table. Otherwise, if we altered the load and the length of the rule hanging over the table we would not have a fair test as we could not claim that load is directly proportional to the extension because as the metre rule would hang at different lengths over the table, the extension would vary even with the same load on the rule. This would flaw the experiment, as there would be no point in investigating how extension varies with load if we could not tell due to the fact that the rule was hanging at different lengths over the table. I shall control the length of the metre rule over the table by clamping one end to a table with a G-clamp, thus knowing it can’t alter and keeping this variable the same throughout the experiment.

I identified two other variables.

Conclusion

The only other further work I could have done to provide additional and relevant evidence would have been to ensure that my hypothesis was proved correct by taking a greater range of evidence e.g. a greater range of masses to add to the metre rule. This would have allowed me to create more relevant and correct readings that could have gone towards backing up my hypothesis. Any anomalies would have been more easily identified and I would have created a greater range of results. Also, I could have had different amounts of the rule on the table e.g. 30cm on the table and 70cm hanging off the table. This would have enabled me to compare the repeated results to see if the same theory emerged and to prove that it was not a fluke. It would not matter that the extensions differed, provided the theory still remained the same. This was however unnecessary as I have repeated my readings enough times, so that one theory stood up above them all, to eventually prove my hypothesis thoroughly correct.

(3593 words)

Acknowledgements:

Physics For You - pages 114 and 74

The Internet – www.studentcentral.co.uk

Longman’s Student Revision Guide

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Waves & Cosmology essays

1. ## I am investigating the relationship between extension and load, therefore testing Hooke's Law.

Observation: Results I obtained the following results: Weight (N) Mass (grams) Length1 (cm) Length2 (cm) Length3 (cm) Average Extension (cm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 50 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.7 1.0 100 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 1.5 150 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 2.0 200 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0

2. ## Determine the value of 'g', where 'g' is the acceleration due to gravity.

Repeating the experiment 3 or more times and taking averages can decrease the random error. For every equipment I have used for this experiment had a range and an error which are written in the apparatus list. My error in the extension is the error in the meter ruler and

1. ## Resonance in a Closed Air Column Investigation.

Similarly, it is interference that causes the matching frequency of the driving force and the natural frequency of the swing to swing higher and higher. The swing goes higher and higher just like when the crests or troughs of the sound waves meet, the amplitude of the crests get higher and higher causing a louder sound.

2. ## To investigate the relationship between the extension and the force added, whether they are ...

mm +15 350 60 165 mm 105 mm +15 400 60 180 mm 120 mm +15 450 60 194 mm 135 mm +15 500 60 210 mm 150 mm Conclusion: I have now completed my investigation and obtained a good set of results.

1. ## Investigate stretching using Hooke's Law.

88.5mm 23mm 75mm 3.0N 91.5mm 31mm 75mm 3.5N 96mm 39mm 75mm 4.0N 100mm 44mm 75mm 4.5N 105.5mm 54mm 75mm 5.0N 111.5mm 65.5mm 75mm 5.5N 117.5mm 77mm 75mm 6.0N 119mm 84.5mm 75mm 6.5N 125mm 97.5mm 75mm 7.0N 133mm 110.5mm 75mm 7.5N 138mm 121.5mm 75mm 8.0N 143.5mm 133mm 75mm 8.5N 149mm 142.5mm

2. ## Our Universe as a Laboratory for Understanding Physical Laws

When the Type 1a supernovae were studied in greater detail, their light curves and spectra matched. Also, astronomers could tell that the same physical processes were occurring in all of the massive explosions. The type 1a supernovae were studied when they brightened and faded.

1. ## Waves and Cosmology - AQA GCE Physics Revision Notes

Particles Baryon number Charge Proton (uud) + + = 1 + - = 1 Antiprotons (uud) + + = -1 + + = -1 Neutron (udd) + + = 1 + + = 0 ?+ (ud) + = 0 + = 1 K+ (us)

2. ## I intend to investigate whether any correlation exists between the wavelength of light exerted ...

I must first find the mode output voltage of the solar panel, and read downwards to the X-axis to find out the response time of the solar panel. However, as the voltage is rounded to 1 d.p, the actual response time of the cell may be lower than that which is identifiable from the rounded voltage.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to