• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the usefulness of observations in sociological research

Extracts from this document...


Assess the usefulness of observations in sociological research Observations are often regarded as the best sociological research method for studying naturalistic behaviour. They can be split into different categories including; participant- in which the researcher partakes in the activities they are observing, non-participant- in which the researcher takes a 'backseat' and does not get involved, overt- the participants know that they are being observed and covert- the participants are unaware that they are being observed. Observations produce qualitative data, which has high levels of ecological validity but low levels of reliability due to the difficulties in repeating an observation. In the late 1950s "James Patrick" (this is a pseudonym) obtained entry into a Maryhill area Glaswegian gang for four months. This was a participant observation as Patrick joined in with the gang's activities a total of 12 times. It was an overt observation, although one member, Tim, was aware that Patrick was a researcher. The major strength of using a covert observation in this instance is probably the fact that Patrick would not otherwise have been able to obtain access into the gang. By going undercover, Patrick was able to gain an insight into an otherwise closed part of society. However, covert observations can create issues with regards to safety. ...read more.


This is when his research became a participant observation. Because Whyte's observation was overt, he was able to record data easily. This is a strength of overt observations as by recording data straight away important information is less likely to be forgotten or recorded inaccurately. An overt observation is also useful on a practical level. Whyte did not have to drastically alter his appearance etc, and so he saved time and money on this. However, overt observations can lead to subjectivity on the part of the subjects. Their behaviour may be liable to change if they are aware that they are being observed which would not therefore produce a fair representation of life in the gang. In addition to saving money, Whyte put himself in less danger by carrying out a covert observation. He stayed doing his research for 3 1/2 years, which was time consuming but did allow Whyte to get a very detailed insight into the life of his participants and therefore produce a valid piece of research. The main problem with Whyte's observation was to do with cultural differences between him and the group. He did not know much about some of their key interests, horse racing for example, and therefore could not participate properly. ...read more.


Eileen Barker studied the unification church or 'Moonies' for close to seven years. She used a range of sociological methods including overt, participant observations. Barker got to know the members as individuals, spent time in centres, went on courses and tried to live with them as much as possible. Barker developed a rapport with many of the Moonies, building quite a personal relationship with some of them. On the one hand, this can be seen as good for her research- the Moonies were more likely to trust her and welcome her into the community which would make conducting her research easier. Conversely, getting too close to the participants could result in Barker 'going native' and stop her from noticing and recording abnormalities or noteworthy events, which is a major concern when carrying out any research. The length of time which Barker spent undertaking this study was almost seven years. By spending such a long time observing the Unification Church, Barker would have been able to develop a good understanding of its inner workings, which bears well for a good piece of research. To conclude, it can be said that observations are useful for researching closed groups of society, providing detailed, qualitative research and capturing unexpected data about a topic. They do not, however, provide data that can be easily quantified which means they are not the ideal research method in all situations. ?? ?? ?? ?? Anna Gettings ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Demography topic revision notes. The study of populations and their characteristics is called ...

    One result of this has been a greater diversity of family patterns in Britain today. However, as noted earlier, throughout this period, more people left the UK than entered. Nor did non-white immigrants make up the majority of settlers. During the 1950s, the Irish were the largest single group (with over a third of a million)

  2. Participant Observation

    A particular problem for overt observation, and sometimes covert, is that the observer's presence may change the behaviour of the group; called the 'Hawthorne effect'. These are drawbacks of participant observation, which may not be so useful when used in sociological research.

  1. Assess the usefulness of Positivist Research

    A good example of this at work is scientific studies, paid for by the tobacco industry, to prove no link between cigarette smoking and lung cancer. The face that this has itself been disproved clearly shows the extent to which positivist and scientific research can be distorted, and that positivist research is not value-free and objective in some cases.

  2. Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a research method for sociologists.

    Positivists would argue that there is no way of knowing whether the findings of participant observations are true or not, since there is no possibility of replicating the research. In other words, the results may lack reliability. Participant observation is usually used to study small groups of people who are not typical of the wider population.

  1. Examine the usefulness of Social Surveys as a research method.

    Usually the ones that return the questionnaires back share similar personalities and they are the ones that are unemployed and/or are retired i.e. individuals that have a lot of free time, therefore making it difficult to gain a fair representation of the population and come about generalisations.

  2. Discuss the usefulness of Quantative and Qualitative Methods in study of Suicide.

    From a theoretical stand-point, statistics are great as they do enable the positivist Durkheim to establish links and causal laws; something which is done much easier when the method of research is as quantative as statistics. However, statistics are still a form of secondary data and so can be essentially

  1. Social research

    On the other hand, it doesn't relate to my question in the sense that it doesn't go into detail about young people's actual career choices. I want to know how house prices affect their career choices, not just where they actually live.

  2. Assess the usefulness of interactionist approaches to the study of society

    They see behaviour as fixed and predictable. But Blumer argues, although behaviour is partially predictable because we internalize the expectations of others and behave the way we?re expected, behaviour is not completely fixed. We can have a choice in how we behave and perform our roles e.g.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work