• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Deviance is normal" - In what sense is this true?

Extracts from this document...


"Deviance is normal". In what sense is this true? Deviance could be identified as a form of social classification which is a sociological concept concerning "things" which offend a cultures expectance and social norms. Thus deviance can change over time and differ from societies, what is not accepted in one decade or society can be in another. For example guy relationships where once perceived as a mental illness. It could now be argued that they have become social accepted and are no longer perceived as being deviant or a mental illness. This change of viewpoint could be due to time and the society's values changing. Downs and Rode defined deviance "As banned or controlled behavior which is likely to attract punishment or disapproval." Thus suggesting that all forms of "anti social" behavior are included, when considering deviance. Such acts such as murder which attracts punishment right through to mild acts such as burping and farting which attract mild disapproval. Therefore Downs and Rock could be suggesting that deviance is "normal" depending on the boundaries that the society enforces. Deviance can be either secret or private and occur within the home and can also be public and open. Deviance however is often concealed and feared off. ...read more.


Secondary deviance concerns acts which have been publicly labeled as deviant and can affect ones status in society. By society labeling more acts as deviant they could be in danger as creating further deviance as ever act could become deviant. Thus labeling people as deviant publicly marks them out so that the individual who was ones a friend, family member is now perceived as a criminal and has a stigma attached to them. They have been given a negative status and are not allowed to interact with society and may feel rejected thus seeks comfort in committing more deviant acts as they have accepted the label that has been given to them. This is referred to as "self fulfilling prophecy" where the individual carries out deviant acts as it gives them some form of "social status" and they feel it is what is expected of them. The labeling theory can be criticized as it does not consider who makes the rules and does not take into account how they become applied. Further more it does not take into consideration were the stereotypes originate form (Soc in focus pg 480) In addition there is no evidence suggesting that labeling an individual does have an effect on their behavior and cause them to be deviant or whether it is the interaction with other so called "criminals" which cause further deviant behavior. ...read more.


For example epilepsy has been in all three categories in history it has been perceived as a mental illness, a form of social deviance (badness) and as it is know today a physical illness. Ideas of what is social Normal can be worked out from these three categories. All the theories appear to empathies the importance that conformity plays in whether deviance occurs or not. It could be argued that a society should give leeway and accept that deviance is normal and likely to occur, due to as all being individuals with different thoughts and feelings and roles to play within society. For society to advanced according to Durkeims perspective then we need to take individuals needs into consideration and perhaps be more understanding. This can be seen in Holland who accept deviance as normally and have a lower crime rate, whereas in South Africa who implement strict rules and punishments on levels of freedom they "sow higher levels of violence" (Giddens pg 153). Thus suggesting that societies who accept deviance as normal need not suffer breakdown and moral confusion as long as equality is still a key factor. In addition as long as society's members are allowed to fulfill their wishes and are not restricted and the needs of the wider community are not forgotten then deviance need not be seen as a threat and be considered as Normal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance.

    4 star(s)

    for success did not mean that people simply gave-up wanting to be successful. This was not possible because the whole thrust of their socialisation was geared towards the value of success. In a situation whereby people desired success - yet were effectively denied it - he argued that people would find other, probably more unlawful, means towards desired ends.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    This is because women fear crime more than men and as a consequence adopt various avoidance behaviours, for example not going out alone at night. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF LIBERAL AND RADICAL FEMINISM Radical feminist ideas have gained empirical support.

  1. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    This is not necessarily and is usually not true because Crime Statistics are generally flawed, mainly due to the fact that they do not record all crime, under-record certain types of crime such as domestic crime, and most importantly, only show us the actual rate of reported crime, not crime itself.

  2. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    However, traditional Marxists have been heavily criticised. Left Realists criticise Marxists for ignoring intra-class crime. Working class crimes are not always committed against middle class people. They also believe that Marxists ignore the seriousness of working class crimes by excusing it and saying that capitalism makes people criminogenic.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    indicates a society that is sick, which means that it is suffering from social disorganisation. Durkheim does not, however, provide any indication of what a 'normal' crime rate might be, or how it could be calculated. There was a paradigm shift in criminology in the 1960s which can loosely be called labelling theory.

  2. Assess the view that crime is functional, inevitable and normal.

    For example the invasion of the House of Commons, would be a warning device to society relating to security issues. Durkheim also points out that a sense of social cohesion can be created by particularly heinous crimes. A sense of shared outrage can bring a community closer together.

  1. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    For Cohen the subculture offers positive rewards pertaining to status, however the subculture will impose certain criteria on its members in order to gain this recognition and prestige. (Haralambos, 2000, page 357) Cohen expressed that the actions of the delinquent subculture often demonstrate animosity for those able to participate legitimately within society, thus rebelling against an unjust system.

  2. Outline and evaluate Durkheims theory of suicide.

    Was a note left or the threat of suicide voiced? However, in only 30 % of suicides a note may have been discovered, many more may have been written and removed by family or friends because of what it contained.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work