• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Different perspectives on whether deviance is a beneficial part of a healthy society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A LEVEL SOCIOLOGY Introduction Deviance is any non- conformist behaviour that is disapproved of by society or a social group, whether it is illegal or not. It is norm- breaking behaviour and can range from being eccentric to criminal activity. Deviance maybe positively sanctioned (remedies) or negatively (punished) or simply accepted or tolerated. For example a soldier on a battlefield, who risks his life beyond the call of duty, may be termed deviant, as may a scientist who breaks the rules of the discipline and develops a new theory. Their deviance may be positively sanctioned; the soldier might get a medal; the physicist the Nobel prize. In another sense, neither is deviant, since both conform to the values of their society, the soldier to the value of courage, the scientist to the value of academic progress. However some groups of deviants come from those who depart from the social norm because they don't know they exist or they have forgotten them, for example children or people with learning disabilities. ...read more.

Middle

Humans do not just identify differences they also evaluate them good/bad, normal/abnormal and natural/unnatural. Cohen (1966) argued that Deviance could be seen as a 'safety valve' allowing a relatively harmless expression of discontent. However in this way social order is protected. For example Cohen suggests that prostitution can release the stress and pressure of family life without undermining family stability as most relationships between prostitution and their client avoid emotional attachments. This way prostitution performs a safety valve function. Cohen also suggests that certain deviant acts are a useful warning device to alert that an aspect of society is malfunctioning. Durkheim suggested that society itself generates deviance for its own well-being. Cohen added that certain forms of deviance are a natural and normal response to particular crime. Durkheim believed there are four functions of crime. The law makes the extremities of acceptable behaviour to set and make it clear to the rest of the public what is acceptable behaviour. ...read more.

Conclusion

Criticisms There are a few problems connected with Durkhiems view. The first is that he did not offer any real explanation as to why certain people are more likely to commit deviant acts than others. Marxist perspectives argue that another problem lies in Durkhiems stress of the harmony of society and the belief that law reflects the interests and views of the majority of the population. He ignores the concept of power. Marxist believes that it is the ruling class who have greater ability than the bulk of the population to influence the law making process. Conclusion In conclusion there are many aspects as to why deviance is a beneficial part of all healthy societies. I believe that if a society had people who are all good then when a person does an act, which violates and goes against a social norm, then this will be seen as a crime. Therefore deviance to some extent is a good aspect for every society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

    Hirschi supported Durkheim's explanations, however he asked the question why don't people commit and not why people do.

  2. Describe law and order in London in the late 19th century

    Instead the detectives and police used basic interviews and witness accounts, which if recorded, would of helped catch the killer as it is believed the ripper must have been interviewed and seen several times with a good enough excuse to let him go.

  1. "Deviance is normal" - In what sense is this true?

    The labeling theory is supported by Howard Becker 1963 who feels "the central fact about deviance is that it is created by society". Labeling theory questions why actions can be labeled as deviant and who does this, is it social power?

  2. anti-social behaviour

    3.5 In order to obtain a sample of twenty individuals to complete the questionnaires, individuals were approached on a one to one basis and the research and aims of the investigation were explained to them. They were then informed that by agreeing to take part, it would in no way

  1. Offender Profiling Handout

    A Behavioural Investigative Advisor has been defined as follows: "... one who can provide investigative support and advice that links the theoretical basis of behavioural science with its effective application to the investigation of serious crime". This definition could be interpreted as an implicit acknowledgement of past criticisms of offender profiling.

  2. Deviance in Society A person would be considered to be acting deviantly in society ...

    Modern research finds that the lack of supervision, or support a child needs is a link to delinquency in any race. It occurs more in single parent homes because they have a harder time doing those things. Poverty is also a reason in the family for conflict because it can lead to both family break-ups and delinquency.

  1. Crime and Deviance

    According to Durkheim, people in the modern age are less constrained than they were in traditional societies, because there is more room for individual choice in the modern world, there will inevitably be some non-conformists. Functionalists theories see crime and deviance resulting from structural tensions and a lack of moral regulation within society.

  2. Crime and Deviance

    I.e. bring issues to public's attention. Deviance often changes society, e.g. women's right to vote. In 1920's UK was a sexist society and now it has changed. Work of Durkheim Durkheim and functionalists believed that crime and criminal behavior are essential in all healthy societies. Durkheim believed that it was impossible for everyone in a society

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work