• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance.

Extracts from this document...


Sociology Essay Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance (50 marks) Functionalism has been one of the most important approaches in explaining deviant behaviour. Functionalism has also played an important part in explaining other areas of sociology, such as health and education. In basic Functionalist terms, if something exists in society it must have a purpose for existing, and, since crime exists, it must perform functions for the society. Functionalist explanations look at the implications of crime and crime control policies, rather than directly attempting to explain the causes of criminal behaviour. However, unlike other models that eliminate blame from offenders by claiming criminals have little free will, a functionalist approach favours suppression of criminal activity and the use of appropriate sanctions. The major difference between functionalist and all other theories of crime causation is its apparent positive view of deviant behaviour. Durkheim identified two different sides of crime, a positive side, which helped society change and remain dynamic, and a negative side, which saw too much crime leading to social disruption. ...read more.


Only by re-imposing collective values can the situation be brought back under control. The theoretical nature of this type of approach to studying criminal behaviour comes across numerous criticisms. One of the major criticisms of Durkheim's work in relation to crime has been the idea that he ignores the way in which power is a significant variable in relation to the way in laws are created and maintained in any society. Consequently, whilst Durkheim argued that the collective conscience was the objective expression of the values held by everyone in society. Erikson attempted to develop Durkheim's basic ideas about such things as the boundary setting function of law. He did this by arguing that powerful groups within any society were able to impose their views upon the majority by a process of ideological manipulation. Merton also criticised Durkheim's idea of anomie as being too vague. Merton argued that anomie was a situation where the socially approved goals of society were not available to a substantial proportion of the population if they followed socially approved means of obtaining these goals. ...read more.


therefore theories based on these statistics are not especially valid. The overall functionalist theory on crime and deviance is criticised by Marxists. They claim that the criminal justice system is built in favour of the ruling class and that they use institutions like mass media and the educational system to divert people's attention away from their situation. Thinking synoptically, the educational system is also said to be an ideological state apparatus, whose main function is to reproduce class inequalities, therefore there will always be a communities, such as the working class, which are stereotyped as criminal. This helps the ruling class by maintaining their ideology of working class crime. Crime too plays a part in transmitting ruling class ideology as it diverts attention away from the exploitative nature of capitalism and focuses attention of the frightening nature of certain criminal groups in society. Which justifies heavy policing of working class areas and stop searches on young people, whereas the functionalist approach does not provide an explanation for this. Functionalists also have the view that socialisation is a positive process that never fails. Nevertheless, if this were the case then crime and deviance would not be the social problems that they are. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay shows excellent understanding of Durkheim and Merton, and the Functionalist perspective generally. The grade could be improved by using other theoretical perspectives to evaluate - such as Interpretivism or Feminism, which would make a more critical essay. The essay title was very specific when it asked the candidate to 'evaluate' the theory, but the essay spends much time describing than it needs to.

Marked by teacher Lesley Clark 08/02/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Durkheim was the first to argue that the causes of suicide were to be found in social factors, not individual personalities. Observing that the rate of suicide in a society varied with time and place, Durkheim looked for causes linked to time and place rather than only to emotional stress.

  2. Assess functionalist theories of crime and deviance.

    Regardless of criticisms, others have developed his theories. Cohen explains how crime is functional as it can work as a safety valve. In the nuclear family, the husband will become stressed from work but if he cannot be distressed by his wife then he can visit a prostitute who will

  1. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    of a class, without engaging in victimology to identify whether any particular class or group is most likely to be the victim of such crime (because many criminals are disinclined to travel far, working class crime is often directed at working class people who live in the same neighborhood).

  2. Critically evaluate the contribution that the Labelling theory has made to our understanding of ...

    Gouldner's Marxist argument claims that labelling theorists draw attention away from the 'real crime'. Additionally, one of the areas in which labelling theory has been most productive is in its analysis of mental illness and its treatment. Labelling theorists present a serious challenge to conventional approaches in two ways.

  1. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    provides a more detailed account of the labelling theory. Lemert labels those who engage in deviant behaviour are called primary deviants. They receive negative reactions from other people, transforming themselves into that negative definition. The transformation can be seen as a 'protective move' so it is no shock to them when they are labelled criminal.

  2. Assess the sociological explanations for why boys underachieve at school

    This gender identity confusion links to the traditional gender role confusion and uncertainty evident in the changes in the job market sociological explanation. This uncertainty and confusion in regards to masculinity some would say is linked to the underachievement in boys educationally. However, this view would be opposed by feminists.

  1. Sociological explanations for patterns of female crime

    The sex-role theory has three main elements that are integrated with it. They are socialization, which simply is where girls are socialized differently to boys. The values that girls are brought up to hold are those that simply do not lead to crime. Sociologist, Talcott Parsons (1973)

  2. Outline some of the reasons why different pupil subcultures exist in schools. (12 marks)

    tend to remain committed to the values of school. They gain their status in the approved manner, through academic success. Lacey found that those placed in lower streams, suffer a loss of self-esteem: the school has undermined their self-worth by placing them in a position of inferior status.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work