• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance.

Extracts from this document...


Sociology Essay Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance (50 marks) Functionalism has been one of the most important approaches in explaining deviant behaviour. Functionalism has also played an important part in explaining other areas of sociology, such as health and education. In basic Functionalist terms, if something exists in society it must have a purpose for existing, and, since crime exists, it must perform functions for the society. Functionalist explanations look at the implications of crime and crime control policies, rather than directly attempting to explain the causes of criminal behaviour. However, unlike other models that eliminate blame from offenders by claiming criminals have little free will, a functionalist approach favours suppression of criminal activity and the use of appropriate sanctions. The major difference between functionalist and all other theories of crime causation is its apparent positive view of deviant behaviour. Durkheim identified two different sides of crime, a positive side, which helped society change and remain dynamic, and a negative side, which saw too much crime leading to social disruption. ...read more.


Only by re-imposing collective values can the situation be brought back under control. The theoretical nature of this type of approach to studying criminal behaviour comes across numerous criticisms. One of the major criticisms of Durkheim's work in relation to crime has been the idea that he ignores the way in which power is a significant variable in relation to the way in laws are created and maintained in any society. Consequently, whilst Durkheim argued that the collective conscience was the objective expression of the values held by everyone in society. Erikson attempted to develop Durkheim's basic ideas about such things as the boundary setting function of law. He did this by arguing that powerful groups within any society were able to impose their views upon the majority by a process of ideological manipulation. Merton also criticised Durkheim's idea of anomie as being too vague. Merton argued that anomie was a situation where the socially approved goals of society were not available to a substantial proportion of the population if they followed socially approved means of obtaining these goals. ...read more.


therefore theories based on these statistics are not especially valid. The overall functionalist theory on crime and deviance is criticised by Marxists. They claim that the criminal justice system is built in favour of the ruling class and that they use institutions like mass media and the educational system to divert people's attention away from their situation. Thinking synoptically, the educational system is also said to be an ideological state apparatus, whose main function is to reproduce class inequalities, therefore there will always be a communities, such as the working class, which are stereotyped as criminal. This helps the ruling class by maintaining their ideology of working class crime. Crime too plays a part in transmitting ruling class ideology as it diverts attention away from the exploitative nature of capitalism and focuses attention of the frightening nature of certain criminal groups in society. Which justifies heavy policing of working class areas and stop searches on young people, whereas the functionalist approach does not provide an explanation for this. Functionalists also have the view that socialisation is a positive process that never fails. Nevertheless, if this were the case then crime and deviance would not be the social problems that they are. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This essay shows excellent understanding of Durkheim and Merton, and the Functionalist perspective generally. The grade could be improved by using other theoretical perspectives to evaluate - such as Interpretivism or Feminism, which would make a more critical essay. The essay title was very specific when it asked the candidate to 'evaluate' the theory, but the essay spends much time describing than it needs to.

Marked by teacher Lesley Clark 08/02/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Asses the arguments and evidence which suggest women commit much less crime than men

    4 star(s)

    Writers such as Heidensohn, Smart and Walkate have all said that women are prosecuted for crime based on their social role in society. Pat Carlen (1997) has also supported this view saying that courts do not sentence women on the seriousness of the crime, but if a woman is single

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Durkheim was the first to argue that the causes of suicide were to be found in social factors, not individual personalities. Observing that the rate of suicide in a society varied with time and place, Durkheim looked for causes linked to time and place rather than only to emotional stress.

  1. Examine strain theories as an explanation of crime and deviance in contemporary society

    Cohen suggested that lower class boys aimed to emulate middle class values and aspirations, but lacked the means to attain success.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    He views the family as the key building block of society. Crime therefore occurs when families fail to instil the correct norms and values into their offspring. Other institutions in society can also fail in their duty of socialization- including education, the media and religion.

  1. The Justice and welfare debate.

    at its worse, has a deleterious effect on future behaviour' (Wolfgang et al 1972:252, cited in Rutherford A, 1992:34. In England a Cambridge longitudinal study done by Farrington and West (1961) showed similar results. Farrington argued that 'once the young offender had been given his first conviction he would be

  2. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    provides a more detailed account of the labelling theory. Lemert labels those who engage in deviant behaviour are called primary deviants. They receive negative reactions from other people, transforming themselves into that negative definition. The transformation can be seen as a 'protective move' so it is no shock to them when they are labelled criminal.

  1. Why do people bully? The expert on bullying, Professor Dan Olweus of the University ...

    As an example, bullies find satisfaction when causing an injury or suffering on others. Moreover, bullies are normally periodically emotional. They were once victims of bullies before. Based on Dr. Peter Sheras research, around 40% of the bullies were bullied before (National Institutes of Health).

  2. Assess the usefulness of realist explanations of crime and deviance

    Where Wilson believes that that high crime rates are due to socialisation, Murray believes that it is all down to the welfare state. It is argued that the welfare stated has created a dependency culture where by people have become married to the welfare state.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work