• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluation of Functionalism and Marxism

Extracts from this document...


Introduction to Sociology - Task 3 Sociology is made up of different perspectives that agree and disagree in many areas, which help to explain the nature of society and its complexities. Two of the most influential perspectives which have helped shape sociological beliefs, and explain how societies function as well as interpret the causes of social change, are functionalism and Marxism. Functionalism and Marxism are structural approaches and therefore agree that society can be analysed in terms of a specific structure, with less emphasis being placed on individuals. They also can be referred to as holistic or macro approaches as they look at society as a whole, or the 'big picture'. Despite these similarities however, there are major contradictions when it comes to explanations of society. Functionalists believe that society is based around consensus which is achieved through most people in society sharing the same values. Marxists discard this theory however, suggesting that conflict between different groups pursuing their own interests is what is important when understanding society. Major functionalist influences including Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) ...read more.


who sell their labour power in return for a wage. Conflict occurs as the bourgeoisie uses its power to oppress and exploit the proletariat, yet these workers rarely challenge this unequal relationship because ruling class ideology is integrated into society through the education or the media etc, which is of course controlled by the more powerful people. This is a description of a capitalist society. Marx calls for revolutionary change, which will inevitably happen in his eyes due to the proletariat realising they are an oppressed class, to a communist society where everything is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs. If this is definitely going to happen however, when will that revolution occur? No time limit is set on this and whilst communism does not appear imminent, it may lead many people to question it as a very subjective opinion which cannot be proven. These perspectives don't come without their critics. Some argue that a limitation of both functionalism and Marxism is that they both ignore the individual's freedom of choice. ...read more.


It obviously identifies a ruling class juxtaposed with a subject class, however it seems to generalise people of different genders, ethnicity, sexuality and ages into these two categories. What Marxism also fails to provide is an explanation of non-economic conflict and why this might occur, electing to only discuss that of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Religious disagreement that leads to conflict could be considered as non-economic and could be fought by many different types of people on both sides, which may include in some cases two different classes of people, as Marxists would describe them, working together for a common belief. While both of these perspectives are very popular, it may be the case that they are not entirely suitable for explaining every part of society. Instead, they each are better at explaining different areas. Functionalism excels at explaining balance and harmony in society whilst Marxism focuses its attention more on inequality and conflict. Societies never remain the same and things are always changing, which may mean it's unlikely that a sociological perspective will ever solely be able to master explaining all aspects of society in great depth, and even if it does, it may not take too long before it becomes unrealistic or outdated. ?? ?? ?? ?? Matthew Burgess ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Free essay

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of society

    3 star(s)

    in other words, to understand the world from the point of view of those you are studying. This approach to human nature was first developed by Weber, who argued that human beings are all individuals, and should not be studied like animals.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Produce an essay identifying the different sociological approaches to secularisation with reference to Marxism, ...

    4 star(s)

    saw that all societies must have some sort of sacred symbols and communal ritual if they are to continue. This may show how even though Durkheim believed religion would become less main-stream in people's lives; it would become a private matter, but still strong enough to exist in a new

  1. Sociological Perspectives - there are three major categories in which people might go about ...

    And although that explains a large part, and is part of our society today, it doesn't address the smaller and more subtle issues. Unlike the two perspectives above, symbolic interactionists focus the sociological view on the micro level, and on face-to-face interactions between people (Ferris 50).


    After only seven trials, Albert became frightened and backed away from the white rat every time he saw it. Behaviour therapy could have been used to counter Albert's conditioning by exposing him to the phobic stimulus (the white rat) while pairing the sight of the white rat with something pleasant (sweets, hugs, cuddles)

  1. Sociological Perspectives

    It is for this reason that some traditional sociologists felt threatened. They felt that what was being suggested was that their own theories of social structure and order were in fact illusionary, that they had used their own commonsense to organize the data they had collected.

  2. Two concepts of society are functionalism and Marxism.

    For example, in a child's learning life they are taught to strictly obey rules which follow them into working life. Marxists see society as a hierarchy with the bourgeoisie at the top and the proletariat being at the bottom. They see society aiming towards the benefit of the bourgeoisie.

  1. Outline and discuss the contribution made by Marxism to our understanding of society

    It also contrasts sharply with other sociologists, including the Functionalist views of Emile Durkheim, who argued that the family benefits both society as a whole, and the individual members of the family. It has sparked debates concerning the role and function of the family structure and its origins, with anthropologists arguing the reliability of Engels discovery.

  2. Functionalism, Marxism and Interactionism. Complimentary or Contradictory?

    As you can see from reading the text above the sociological ideas of functionalism and Marxism and complimentary in the way they view society as the shaper of the individual but they are completely contradictory in the way they believe individuals react to socialisation, Functionalism is based on consensus whilst Marxism is based on conflict.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work