• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluation of Functionalism and Marxism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction to Sociology - Task 3 Sociology is made up of different perspectives that agree and disagree in many areas, which help to explain the nature of society and its complexities. Two of the most influential perspectives which have helped shape sociological beliefs, and explain how societies function as well as interpret the causes of social change, are functionalism and Marxism. Functionalism and Marxism are structural approaches and therefore agree that society can be analysed in terms of a specific structure, with less emphasis being placed on individuals. They also can be referred to as holistic or macro approaches as they look at society as a whole, or the 'big picture'. Despite these similarities however, there are major contradictions when it comes to explanations of society. Functionalists believe that society is based around consensus which is achieved through most people in society sharing the same values. Marxists discard this theory however, suggesting that conflict between different groups pursuing their own interests is what is important when understanding society. Major functionalist influences including Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) ...read more.

Middle

who sell their labour power in return for a wage. Conflict occurs as the bourgeoisie uses its power to oppress and exploit the proletariat, yet these workers rarely challenge this unequal relationship because ruling class ideology is integrated into society through the education or the media etc, which is of course controlled by the more powerful people. This is a description of a capitalist society. Marx calls for revolutionary change, which will inevitably happen in his eyes due to the proletariat realising they are an oppressed class, to a communist society where everything is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs. If this is definitely going to happen however, when will that revolution occur? No time limit is set on this and whilst communism does not appear imminent, it may lead many people to question it as a very subjective opinion which cannot be proven. These perspectives don't come without their critics. Some argue that a limitation of both functionalism and Marxism is that they both ignore the individual's freedom of choice. ...read more.

Conclusion

It obviously identifies a ruling class juxtaposed with a subject class, however it seems to generalise people of different genders, ethnicity, sexuality and ages into these two categories. What Marxism also fails to provide is an explanation of non-economic conflict and why this might occur, electing to only discuss that of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Religious disagreement that leads to conflict could be considered as non-economic and could be fought by many different types of people on both sides, which may include in some cases two different classes of people, as Marxists would describe them, working together for a common belief. While both of these perspectives are very popular, it may be the case that they are not entirely suitable for explaining every part of society. Instead, they each are better at explaining different areas. Functionalism excels at explaining balance and harmony in society whilst Marxism focuses its attention more on inequality and conflict. Societies never remain the same and things are always changing, which may mean it's unlikely that a sociological perspective will ever solely be able to master explaining all aspects of society in great depth, and even if it does, it may not take too long before it becomes unrealistic or outdated. ?? ?? ?? ?? Matthew Burgess ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Free essay

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of society

    3 star(s)

    There have been some criticisms with his interpretation, such as being an example of the logical error called the ecological fallacy, in which a fallacy falsely assumes that individual members of a group have average characteristics, and it usually contains stereotype.

  2. Peer reviewed

    Produce an essay identifying the different sociological approaches to secularisation with reference to Marxism, ...

    4 star(s)

    Webber however, saw rationalisation as the main reason for a decline in religion. He believed this would steadily replace faith. He believed that as the world is demystified of its magic and mystery, religious beliefs are taken away. This is where things are made rational and justified instead of 'acts of God' and linked to religion.

  1. Sociological Perspectives

    If this process is viewed at macro-level it can be seen as somewhat similar to the Conflict Theory. The lower class revolts against the structure and order in place between themselves and the ruling class, this leads to temporary chaos.

  2. - APPROACHES IN PSYCHOLOGY

    until the fear response was reduced and extinguished. During the therapy known as Systematic Desensitisation (SD), the patient is trained to substitute a relaxation response for the fear response in the presence of the phobic stimulus. Since this is unlikely to occur naturally, behaviour therapy can help by exposing phobics to their fears in a safe and controlled setting.

  1. An investigation into people(TM)s belief about Hell

    The method was used consistently throughout the study and it was easy to collate responses for comparison due to the flexibility of the questions. As well as this, the method may not have been entirely valid; participants may have experienced the Hawthorne effect where they give the answers that they

  2. Outline and discuss the contribution made by Marxism to our understanding of society

    He stated that men's efforts to control women's labour had gradually become institutionalised through the nuclear family. This theory has influenced sociologists such as Coontz and Henderson (1986), to explain the subordination of women (Haralambos & Holborn, 2008). Other sociologists such as Radical Feminist Kate Millett, have used this theory

  1. Two concepts of society are functionalism and Marxism.

    This provides us with our values which support the society. A Marxist would disagree with this view, they see social control agencies being used by the bourgeoisie to control the working class and that education gives people their values which support the bourgeoisie exploitation.

  2. Functionalism, Marxism and Interactionism. Complimentary or Contradictory?

    And it is argued by Louis Althusser (1971) that the cultural institutions aims are to maintain and legitimise class inequality. They pass off ruling class norms and values as the natural and normal things in society. The ruling class ideas are referred to as ideology.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work