• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Examine the sociological view that home factors are the key in explaining working class underachievement.'

Extracts from this document...


'Examine the sociological view that home factors are the key in explaining working class underachievement.' Sociologists have looked at how social class affects how well people do at school (E.g. pupils from professional backgrounds are significantly more likely to enter higher education than those from unskilled backgrounds) and, as usual in sociology, different sociologists argue over which factor (E.g., processes inside school, material deprivation and cultural deprivation) is the most important in explaining working class underachievement. Some sociologists such as Eysenck (1971) have suggested that intelligent levels (which are measured through IQ tests) of different social classes account for differences in educational attainment (students underachieve because they are not as intelligent as other students); people are simply born more intelligent than others. Sociologists such as Eysenck argue that IQ tests show that intelligence is innate and inherited from parents. However, there is a social pattern of underachievement along the lines of social class thus other sociologists have criticised this explanation, arguing that a random pattern would be expected if intelligence was simply a result of biological differences. ...read more.


also found that teachers allowed pupils in the top streams access to higher levels of knowledge which the working class, in lower streams, didn't get access to. Therefore this limit that is placed on their knowledge can mean that the students won't do as well in exams. Anti-school subcultures (students in which may be disruptive in lessons, thus won't be paying attention in lessons, leading to lack of knowledge and therefore underachievement in exams) tend to form as a response to negative labelling and frustration with low status (being in low streams). Hargreaves (1975) found that those in bottom streams were more likely form anti-school subcultures and go against norms. Woods (1983) also found that, although there are a variety of reactions from school, negative reactions towards school were more likely to come from working class students. Although labelling, streaming and anti-subcultures are positive ways in trying to explain underachievement, as they look at experiences inside school, there are also limitations to these explanations. For example, these explanations don't look at how factors outside of school (such as cultural deprivation) ...read more.


Some sociologists say that working class children don't have the knowledge and values that help achievement. It may be things such as books, museum visits and parental interest and knowledge of education (which working class children lack experience with) that help middle class pupils succeed. Douglas (1964) thought that the level of parental interest was the most important factor in affecting achievement. He found that middle class parents (whose children achieve higher than those from the working classes) are more likely to visit schools for open evenings. However, some sociologists reject parental interest as an explanation for working class underachievement by mentioning that it may not be the case that working class parents are less interested in their children's education, but more of a case that they just might not be able to attend to do shifts that they work. As can be seen, there are a variety of factors that affect working class underachievement, none of which seem to have more of an effect than others. It may be that the key in explaining working class underachievement is in a combination of the explanations mentioned above. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Discuss Evolutionary Explanations of Parental Investment

    If he also her material resources, her offspring will be more likely to survive. This helps to explain Buss's cross-cultural finding that women valued material resources and industriousness in potential partners. In contrast, males who make less parental investment will be more reproductively successful if they have multiple matings with young, fertile women.

  2. Assess the view that working class underachievement in education is the result of home ...

    Michael Anderson's research, however, directly opposes this view. He says that on average the size of a pre-industrial family was above six, and he concluded that "The pre-industrial family in Europe was characterized by diversity without any type of family predominant."


    Conflict sociologists such as Marxists and feminists argue against the 'March of progress' view that the position of children has improved dramatically in a relatively short period of time. They argue that society is based on a conflict between different social groups such as social classes or genders.

  2. How cultural deprivation affects the educational attainment of students.

    Another concept linked to my study is the home background of the ethnic group. African-Caribbean's, like Asian families, tend to reflect the societies from which they migrated. A large proportion of Afro-Caribbean households in Britain are single parent families, but perhaps the key point is that Afro-Caribbean families tend to be mother-centered.

  1. Boys underachievement in Education

    2. The culture of masculinity encourages boys to want to appear macho and tough. They are therefore more likely to develop an anti-education, anti learning subculture, where school work is seen as unmacho.

  2. GCSE Sociology Coursework

    * Boys seem to be less willing to struggle to overcome difficulties in understanding their work. * Boys are less likely to work consistently hard than girls and are more easily distracted. In areas such as coursework, boys found it more difficult to organize their time effectively.

  1. Mommy Wars. Working and stayathome moms are fighting it out over who is ...

    begin judging other mothers who made the choice they wondered about making (Begala). Nevertheless, the Mommy Wars are not real (Peskowitz 31). Yes, there are moms who do put other mothers down for the others choice. However, for the most part, it is simply a faux war created by media and parenting book authors.

  2. Sociology Research Paper - To examine how teenage pregnancy affects the teen mothers health ...

    hardship The extensive literature review by Dr Dilworth, K from the Canadian Institute of Child Health suggested that statistically, young mothers face a life of poverty, have lower levels of education and have less opportunity in the workplace than non-parenting teens.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work