Explain the ways in which the two writers try to make you share their feelings and points of view.

Mandela uses antithesis to great effect. He demonstrates inequality with, 'in some courts we were treated with courtesy, in others contempt'. This is effective as it displays the two extremes of how Mandela was treated.

Another technique, which Mandela uses very often, is repetition. In almost every paragraph Mandela chooses a word or phrase which he repeats in order to emphasise his points of argument. 'crime to be unemployed ... crime to be employed ... crime to live in certain places and a crime to have no place to live.' This is also a very good example of antithesis as it shows two examples of extreme opposites.

Irony is a technique that appears in both passages. In Mandela's extract he outlines the difficulties of working in South Africa. He ironically contrasts the 'marble statues of justice' with the unjust working conditions and racial inequality. The other author says that 'even in your car you are not safe from prying eyes'. This is ironic and has a double meaning - the eyes are both those of humans and machines (cameras).

There is an element of humour in the first passage which helps to draw the author into the article. 'It is very hard these days to keep skeletons anywhere, let alone in your cupboard.' This would amuse the reader and make them want to read on. Wit hasn't been used in Mandela's piece as his extract is one which has a much more serious purpose than this.

Another technique which solely used to persuade is the inclusion of evidence, facts and figures. In both pieces there is a lot of true accounts, numbers, and pieces of information. In the first article the author includes the fact that there are '100,000 computers are checked by the police national computer every day' to support his claim that 'even in your car you are not safe'. Mandela uses his own recollections to support his argument. 'I recall once defending an African woman ...' he starts one of his paragraphs - this displays to people the reality of what Mandela is persuading them about.

Generally, both the article and Mandela's extract go about very efficiently persuading their readers to adopt their points of view. However, they do this in two very different ways. The former with lots of facts, humour, and rhetorical questions. The later with repetition, recollections, and a serious approach.

1