• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Punishment and Prisons. This essay shall describe the changes in the methods of punishment throughout the last few hundred years, how imprisonment came in to practice and why society has become more civilised in how criminals are dealt with.

Extracts from this document...


In the modern era if a person breaks the law they may be sent to a prison; a place of confinement as punishment for their crime; however in the past a person may have been sentenced to what would now be perceived as an inhumane punishment of death or torture. This essay shall describe the changes in the methods of punishment throughout the last few hundred years, how imprisonment came in to practice and why society has become more civilised in how criminals are dealt with. Modern punishment tends to revolve around prison; however there are many non-custodial sentences such as: community service, fines, anti-social behaviour orders and probation. There are different types of prisons and, depending on the offender and the offence committed, a criminal could go to a minimal security prison, medium security prison, high security prison or juvenile halls if they are young. Young offenders are not imprisoned with adult offenders in case they become corrupted further by their influence; for example, older, more experienced criminals could advise them on how to get away with crime, or more effective ways of committing it. In addition to prison and non-custodial sentences, some offenders can be sent to mental institutions if it is believed that they are suffering from a mental illness. ...read more.


As the welfare state came in to force (1948), the government were taking on more responsibilities and a state-run criminal justice system was developed, (Class Notes). Remand centres were introduced and hard labour was abolished under the Criminal Justice Act (1948). There was also the idea of delivering a short, sharp, shock to young offenders in order to deter them from re-offending. The short, sharp, shock typically involved sending a young offender to a (rough and unpleasant) borstal for two to three months to 'scare' them out of a life of crime. However this regime eventually proved unsuccessful; the first few weeks of imprisonment are usually the worst, but after this time individuals start to 'get used to' it`s unpleasant conditions, and even begin to make friends on the inside. Therefore the 'short', sharp shock was too long, and briefer sentences of a few weeks may well have proved more effective (as well as less expensive). In 1965 the death penalty was finally abolished; a clear marker that society was becoming more rational and civilised. Punishment of the body is now a thing of the past, and sentences of torture and death seem incredibly in-humane by today`s standards. ...read more.


Prisons managed by private companies (such as G4S, Kalyx and Serco) are still subject to the same routine inspections as are public sector prisons. It has been argued that privately run prisons are more efficient, however critics of this initiative state that there have been some major problems with privately managed prisons; for example Ashfield prison for young offenders which opened in 1999 had prisoners withdrawn in 2003 by the Youth Justice board, due to repeated riots and reports of poor management, (Wikipedia). In conclusion prison comes to dominant thinking in punishment due to the sociological changes that have taken place throughout history. It is now 'morally' unacceptable to punish people in physically painful ways, such as death and torture, and everyone, including criminals, have human rights which must be respected. In addition we now know much more about crime, who commits it and why; this, along with society's technological advances, and the introduction of the police force means that more offenders can be caught and punished, and so 'bodily' punishments like death seem a rather unnecessary deterrent. Moreover, rehabilitation means that some offenders can be reformed and reintegrated in to society, (which further reduces the need for a death penalty). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. The Evolution of Punishment.

    The forms of punishment held by the characteristics of the modern societies were 'death by drinking hemlock, by the sword, by strangulation'7. Other sources of punishment were held at hand such as harsher forms of punishment and ways of torture before death sentences.

  2. Explain why Prisons were reformed in the early 19th century.

    Eventually the Bloody Code was abolished with the help of the Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel. Public executions were not working as they caused riots if there was a disagreement over the sentence. It was difficult to control the large crowds and there was a danger of escape if the crowds liked the criminal.

  1. Do criminals need help rather than punishment?

    Also, it prevents offenders from returning to society and committing crime again. As s/he would have to remain behind the bars and society would remain safe. Furthermore, facts shows that during the mediaeval period, when there were no law, and no punishment, accordingly, number of crime rates were high than today.

  2. Discuss the effectiveness of the Prison system, and its purpose in relation to its ...

    An early effort to reform the use of prisons to provide labour came about in the mid 16th century, this was done through the introduction of Bridewells. The first Bridewell, or House of Confinement was introduced in 1556, and in reality was an attempt to deal with the increasing levels of vagrancy.

  1. How might we best explain the rise of the prison as a replacement for ...

    There is also evidence of people returning from being transported and re-offending making its value as a punishment increasingly questionable. If there was to be a change from the present system the new system needed to continue to reflect the elements of the law as shown above, majesty, mercy and justice.

  2. Assess the usefulness of participant observation as a sociological methods

    of Officer Kelly who "knew the people as regulars and strangers, and regulars were made up of decent folk but also drunks and derelicts that knew their place". This suggested that there were some boundaries in what behaviour was tolerated about levels of order and disorder and if communities or

  1. The British Penal System

    * Imprisonment- a court has to consider whether or not to impose a custodial sentence. The court must be aware of all the information about the circumstances of the offence. The court must also obtain a report when considering the length of the sentence.

  2. A Failing Justice System

    Consequently, for the exact number of crimes cannot still be known, it is a fact that the practicability of the criminal justice system is also open for debates (Picca 54). The factors that cause this result are: 1. There isn't any witness for the crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work