• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Justice and welfare debate.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Justice and welfare debate Although it has been generally accepted for many years since the arrival of the youth court in the 1908 Children's Act that 'special procedures are needed to deal with young offenders, and a series of different arrangements have developed. There are conflicting views over how such offenders should be dealt with' (Davies et al, 1995:136). These conflicting views are often referred to as the Justice and welfare debate. The arguments and different opinions of how to deal with young offenders have been in debate for many years. In order to look at two totally different perspectives on how to deal with young people and children who commit crime the following paragraphs will consider the punishment, retribution and deterrence believes of the classical criminologist this being the justice approach. Whilst also comparing this to the welfare and rehabilitation beliefs of the conflict and critical criminologist. The classical theory believes that the punishment should be proportionate to the crime in order to deter the individual and others from committing crime. Furthermore the classical criminologist places the emphasis on the criminal act and not the offender and is concerned with, 'the establishment of a reformed equitable and efficient system of justice' (Tierney J, 1996:49). ...read more.

Middle

The welfare approach argues that the Criminal Justice Act 1989 expressly stated that 'the child's welfare should be the courts paramount consideration' (Rutherford A, 1992:146). A criticism of the welfare approach to dealing with young offenders would be that in allowing social workers and social enquiry reports to play to big a part in deciding on how the young offender should be dealt with, to much consideration is given to the offender. Thus justifying the young offender's criminal act. Advocators of retribution and punishment as deterrence to young people not to commit crime believe that the welfare approach would escalate crime figures even more. They argued that social workers should only be used in a supervisory capacity if the young person is looking at receiving a custodial sentence. Morris et al (1980) and Taylor et al (1979) criticised the welfare approach to youth crime arguing that it reinforced the believe that some how the young persons criminal act could be justified because of the believe that they were in some way socially and economically disadvantaged. The justice approach to dealing with youth crime however has been strongly criticised a lot in recent years, especially incarceration. ...read more.

Conclusion

However as the next general election approached in 1997 Tony Blair moved youth justice from a 'political to an administrative arena'. Giving responsibility for the new youth justice system to local authority chief executives. The chief executives were then 'charged with establishing multi-agency youth offending teams (YOTs) and producing a local Youth Justice Plan' (Muncie J 2000:6). However 'Responsibility for central direction, oversight, the promulgation and enforcement of national standards for youth justice, quality control and the auditing of the YOTs was placed in the hands of the, Youth Justice Board for England and Wales' ( Muncie J 2000:6). The result of the sanctions mention in the previous paragraph means that 'political and strategic responsibility' originally held by local government we now held by the Youth Justice Board who were directly accountable to the Home secretary. However this is open to criticism as it could be argued that it allows ministers to take the credit for any successes whilst blaming the local authority for any failures. Tony Blair's has made his statement 'tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime many times and the causes of crime will be considered in the following paragraph which will focus on risk factors relating to youth criminality ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Inequalities within the 'Criminal JUSTICE System/Process'

    He predicted civil unrest as a result. Comments contradict assumption of innocent until proven guilty, and that just to suggest that where the police decides to arrest and charge, that the person is guilty is highly problematic. (see response from Michael Massey QC in BBC News 7/3/2002)

  2. This paper attempts to analyse Bacceria's (1764) "On Crimes and Punishment" article. In order ...

    Beccaria would probably recognise that zero tolerance could demonstrate and promote the certainty and promptness of a punishment. However, according to Beccaria, for punishment to attain its end, the evil which it inflicts has only to exceed the advantage derivable from the crime.

  1. A Failing Justice System

    When the innocence of two women is proven, the girl gets away with it. Similarly, in "The Chocolate War", the Vigils use psychological pressure to take control of the school. In the end, they are not punished at all even though they beat up a student publicly.

  2. Criminal justice policy.

    The offender is given the opportunity to accept responsibility for the harm caused as the conference examines the real causes and seeks solutions rather than having such decisions imposed by courts. Evaluation of the success of restorative justice initiatives has shown that both victims and offenders show great satisfaction with the process and the outcomes.

  1. Environmental factors that affect offenders and victims.

    Fourth, social change was often confused with social disorganisation. Durkheim introduced the concept of anomie in his book The Division of Labour in Society, published in 1893. He used anomie to describe a condition of deregulation that was occurring in society. This meant that rules on how people ought to behave with each other were breaking down and thus people did not know what to expect from one another.

  2. anti-social behaviour

    method was used; these were questionnaires and interviews, as they are considered useful in developing the approach to this study. This was done because; firstly different methods can be used for different purposes in a study. In addition, it allows the use of different data collection methods to be used

  1. Criminal Investigation Procedures

    The suspect is known to be violent when drugs are involved which may fit in with the threatening note found at the crime scene. As the suspect was a close associate to the victim this may indicate that the victim in fact let the suspect in as thought.

  2. The effect of appearance on the percieved criminality of young individuals

    a large city, it is important that I take into account the fact that the young people may come from similar backgrounds or had similar experiences, so their opinions are not necessarily representative of young people in the United Kingdom as a whole.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work