• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Aim: 'Build a sensor circuit to test the proximity of an object using a light detector to detect light from a bulb reflected f

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aim: 'Build a sensor circuit to test the proximity of an object using a light detector to detect light from a bulb reflected from an object.' In this experiment I am going to build a sensor circuit using an LDR, I will then calibrate the sensor and use my results to test and improve the sensor circuit. The LDR works by having a very high resistance when the light intensity is low, which does not allow current to flow through the potential divider circuit. When the light intensity increases significantly, the resistance reduces dramatically and current can flow through the circuit. The resistor within a circuit can be changed to make the circuit more sensitive. The first thing I had to do was to test two different sensors to see which one had better sensitivity. ...read more.

Middle

The LDR was fixed onto a block of wood so it was level with the bulb. A wooden block was also set between the bulb and LDR to stop light being detected directly from the bulb to the LDR. A wooden board was also used as the object that I would measure the proximity of. A one metre scale was measured out and the board was moved 0.05m for each measurement from 1m down to 0.15m. The Vout was recorded at each point on the scale. The experiment was carried out in a dark room. These are diagrams for the above description: Diagram 2 Diagram 3 My final calibration results are shown in table B: Distance/m Voltage Output/V 1.00 1.77 0.95 1.74 0.90 1.76 0.85 1.75 0.80 1.82 0.75 1.80 0.70 1.85 0.65 1.86 0.60 1.93 0.55 1.98 0.50 2.08 0.45 ...read more.

Conclusion

From my data I could see that the error varies with distance. This could be because of the LDR's limited sensitivity when light is reflected from longer lengths. This means that the percentage error increases with distance. To test this systematic error, I could calibrate the sensor for longer lengths, then test it and compare the percentage error to my first results. The effective range of my sensor is around 0.15m to 0.60m. Important properties of a sensor are good sensitivity resolution, rapid response time, small random and systematic errors. A sensors response time is the time it takes a sensor to respond to a change in it's input. Random error could be caused by a fluctuation in the input or from noise generated by the sensor, these errors are always present in experimental data. Systematic errors occur due to disturbing influences usually from the environment around the sensor and are not easily detected. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Systems and Control section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Systems and Control essays

  1. Building a Sensor to Measure Weight, using a Potential Divider and Wheatstone Bridge.

    The potential divider sensor could only measure 0.01 V for a change in weight of 800 g giving a resolution of 0.0000125 V/g, which is not accurate enough for the sensor's specification of (0.01/1) 0.01 V/g. To improve this resolution I had to determine how I could make the sensor more sensitive.

  2. For this section of coursework I decided to undertake the task of building and ...

    Here are the results. Window Position Thermal EMF generated by my sensor (Test 1) (V) x10-3 Thermal EMF generated by my sensor (Test 2) (V) x10-3 Thermal EMF generated by my sensor (Test 3) (V) x10-3 Average Thermal EMF generated by my sensor (V)

  1. Water level sensor

    Safety My circuit is perfectly safe because before doing the research I checked every wire and found there was no problem. The power supply was the batteries which were 1.5V for each and I got 4. So the total voltage was (1.5*4)V which was less than 38V, so it was safe for humans.

  2. Investigation on sensors

    The amount of wind speed: The more the wind speed the more the voltage produced 2. The size of the motor: If the motor is larger then it would be cutting a bigger magnetic field and therefore more voltage would be produced 3.

  1. Investigate and construct a sensor.

    I would see the sound waves of the oscilloscope moves in an upright and downright direction, then measure how many bars the wave has consumed and then I would work out the voltage by diving the amount of bars by 0.5.

  2. Using a Rotary Potentiometer to Detect the Position of a Robotic Arm

    plan accordingly, to allow readings over the entire range of the sensor (300 degrees). Analysis: Range 4.73 4.62 4.42 4.05 3.41 2.55 1.69 SD 1.46 1.47 1.46 1.37 1.19 0.90 0.60 SD/Range 0.309 0.318 0.329 0.339 0.348 0.354 0.357 The range is simply the range for each resistor's values.

  1. The paper discusses the issues associated with the risks assessed between the organizations bidding ...

    Situation Analysis Issue and Opportunity Identification The goal of Lester Electronics, Inc is to create a financially viable organization by merging with Shang-wa Electronics. The CEO of both organizations is convinced that by merging the two organizations, they have the opportunity to see their organization grow and compete in a larger market.

  2. Aim: Build a sensor circuit to test the proximity of an object using a ...

    setting gave the maximum sensitivity as it had the biggest output to input difference. Next, I had to build my circuits. I used a potential divider circuit for the LDR and a simple circuit for the bulb: Diagram 1 For my final circuit design I used an 'orange power pack'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work