• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Comparative Study of the Two Funeral Speeches from Act II, Scene II of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare.

Extracts from this document...


David Pearce A Comparative Study of the Two Funeral Speeches from Act II, Scene II of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. In this essay I will be examining the two funeral speeches from the play "Julius Caesar" by William Shakespeare. Additionally I will be anlysing the content of each. The funeral Speeches are made by Brutus and Mark Antony, both for the Caesars funeral. I will quickly summerise the events that have happened leading up to Caesar's death. Caesar had recently killed Pompey, the previous leader of Rome, so he was soon to be crowned king. Cassius becomes worried that when Caesar does become leader of Rome, he will bring it to its knees because he doesn't know how to rule properly. Cassius decides to make a conspiracy against Caesar, and begins to persuade people to join it. He manages to recruit Casca, Cinna, Metellus Cimber, Decius Brutus, Trebonius and Caius Ligarus. Cassius powers of persuasion even manage to get Brutus, Caesar's longest and dearest friend to join. Caesar's wife, Calpurnia, tells Caesar of a dream she had. She tells him she had seen a statue of him, with blood pouring out of it's cracks, which Roman Citizens where washing their hands in. Caesar becomes uneasy about this vision, but Decius tells him it was a vision of fortune. ...read more.


In his speech, he implies that only intelligent, sensible people will support his reasons for killing Caesar: Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses. Page 93, Line 15. Brutus implicates that only intelligent, sensible people will support his reasons. Brutus manages to get the crowd's symphony by saying that he loved Caesar, daring the people to find anyone who loved Caesar more. Brutus declares that he never wronged Caesar, daring the people to find anyone who loved him more. Brutus declares that he never wronged Caesar, that he cried for Caesar's love, was happy for his greatness, honored him for his courage, but had to kill him because of Caesar's ambition. He says that the reason for killing Caesar was his great love for Rome. He states: Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. Page 93, Lines 19-20. He then asks rhetorically is the people would want to live their lives as slaves under Caesar's rule or would they prefer to live as freemen with Caesar dead. To anymore insulted by his speech he wonders if, as Romans who love their freedom, they would be offended or reject what he, Brutus, says. He poses the question, "Who is here so base that would be a bondman?" ...read more.


Brutus does not use any props in his speech, which shows us how much he underestimates Mark Antony. Instead, he overuses emotional blackmail to win over the crowd. Throughout his speech, Mark Antony pauses. He does this to show the crowd how much he has been hurt by Caesars death (showing emotional grief) and to give the crowd time to absorb the important points he has made. Again, this shows us that he has thought deeply on how to win over the crowd. What really Mark Antonys speech so great is that when he started the crowd was almost totally against him, and had no interest in listening to him. The only reason they listen to him is because Brutus told them to do so. He has managed to win over the crowd from almost impossible odds, which shows that he knows the Roman Citizens better than Brutus does. In conclusion, it is clear that both speeches try to appeal to the people, and both use repetition, but Brutus takes a defensive approach, leaving the people to their own conclusions. However, Antony takes a prosecuting approach against Brutus because he backs up statements, while Brutus leaves his statements more open-ended. I prefer Mark Antony's speech more as the people seem to find it easier to accept him. He is an emotional and sincere speaker, rather than Brutus who appears more arrogant and forceful. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Julius Caesar section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Julius Caesar essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare Brutus and Antonys speeches in Act III Scene 2 of Julius Caesar. Analyse ...

    4 star(s)

    Brutus then says: "I pause for a reply". By waiting for a reply he challenges the crowds to speak against what he has said. Brutus goes even further to prove that his actions are principled and just. In Line 48, in a second shorter speech, he says: "his death is

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of the speeches of Brutus and Antony in Act 3 Scene ...

    The outcome of this scene will give an idea of what is likely to occur in the many scenes to come. Until now, the play has been aimed at the murder of Caesar, now it goes through a sudden change of direction; that is to secure revenge for Caesar.

  1. In William Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar", honour is displayed as a main theme throughout the ...

    dead Brutus and Cassius talk about how she died and then Brutus says, "speak no more of her. Give me a bowl of wine." Brutus just shrugs her off like nothing has happened. Whereas Cassius is really upset about it "Ha?

  2. Explore the dramatic effectiveness of Act 1 of Julius Caesar.

    determination rule our country, then we are the ones who are ill enough to let that happen. In scene 3, we see that Casca has joined the conspirators and he has now begun to speak like a nobleman, in blank verse.

  1. Compare the speeches of Mark Antony and Brutus in 'Julius Caesar'.

    an orator Brutus uses rhetorical questions, all of which appeal to the crowds sense of patriotism. Firstly he asks 'Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves? Than that Caesar were dead, and live all free men?' The crowd are lost in a field of answers now and are anxious to hear more of his sayings.

  2. Compare and Contrast Brutus and Antony's speeches

    their freedom and their country or any who may be insulted or in disagreement of what he is saying.

  1. Explain how Mark Antony was able to persuade the plebeians of Rome that the ...

    They are confused at this time and do not know whether to believe Brutus or Antony, "Poor soul, his eyes are red as fire weeping." Here a metaphor is used, as it is a good rhetorical device because it places an image in the minds of the plebeians, that encourages them to think about the.

  2. With close reference to the text explain how Mark Antony manipulates the crowd after ...

    Antony uses the word 'honourable' which is Brutus's best attribute, "he was faithful and just to me, but Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honourable man." Antony uses the word honourable describing Brutus after giving reason that Caesar was not ambitious.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work