A comparison between 'Dulce et Decorum Est' and 'Anthem for Doomed Youth' by Wilfred Owen

Authors Avatar

A comparison between ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ and ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ by Wilfred Owen

        Both of these poems were written during the First World War and both concentrate on how innocent people were killed for no particular reason. The titles of the two poems have exactly the opposite meanings to each other. ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ translated into English means it is proper and sweet. From this title you would imagine the poem to be about a noble soldier who goes to war to save his country but it is ironic as the poem is about the complete opposite. The title for ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ tells us that the poem will be about a funeral and how young men’s tragic experiences make the reader feel pity for the ‘doomed youth’. This title is also ironic as the poem is about how the dead soldiers are all being thrown into one big hole like ‘cattle’.

        Both the poems portray Owen’s bitterness and anger towards the war and this is shown in the very first few lines of both poems. ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ displays this fact by describing the soldiers as ‘beggars’, ‘hags’, and ‘coughing’ where as ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ uses the words ‘die’ and ‘anger’.

The opening lines of the two poems are very effective because they produce either some sort of atmosphere and make the reader feel that they are actually there, or show the feelings for the soldiers who fought in the war. ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ does this by using similes such as ‘like old beggars under sacks’ which capture the appearance of the soldiers as cripples and effective onomatopoeia such as ‘sludge’ and ‘trudge’, the sound made of soldiers going through mud.  ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ uses simile to describe the dead soldiers as ‘cattle’ and showing us how little the soldiers were thought of.

 ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ continues to describe the dreadful conditions of the soldiers by using many powerful metaphors in the first stanza such as ‘Men marched asleep’ and ‘drunk with fatigue’. This makes the reader feel sympathetic and shocked and the dehumanising word, ‘blood-shod’ adds to the horror of the helpless soldiers at war.

The use of caesurae throughout this stanza slows down the pace at which the reader reads the stanza.

“Bent double, like beggars under sacks,

Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through

Sludge,”

 Due to the excessive use of commas, it makes every point emphasised, causing the reader to feel angry, helpless and sympathetic because the soldiers were killed for no reason. This makes the stanza more effective as it shows the distress and pain the soldiers are going through.

Join now!

        The next stanza of this poem describes how one man gave his life for others. The first two words, ‘Gas! Gas!’ is like a statement making it effective and the message clear to the reader of what is going on.

From here, the unseen and unimaginable part of the war is revealed where one man was ‘still yelling out and stumbling’ who sacrificed his own life in order to save other people by warning them about the poisonous gas.

“As under a green, I saw him drowning”

This thought is probably one of the most effective ...

This is a preview of the whole essay