• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A contrast and comparison of the two characters, Susan and Irene, in Alan Bennett's Talking Heads

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A contrast and comparison of the two characters, Susan and Irene, in Alan Bennett's Talking Heads There is a wide variety of connection between the two monologues. They both are about women who are trapped in some way. Her anti-social letter writing and her lack of friends trap Irene. You know that Irene has a lack of friends because she calls her pen "a real friend". Susan is an articulate woman trapped in a sterile marriage to an ambitious Anglican clergyman, she has taken to drink and begun an affair with the proprietor of an Asian grocery store in nearby Leeds. Susan is the vicar's wife in 'In Bed amongst the Lentils' and her unhappiness and loneliness is hard to analyse. Alan Bennett here shows that Susan is a witty and complex character. She is not so helpless that she could not have avoided a loveless marriage and a role, tying her to the church in which she has lost faith. Her disappointment seems to relate to her whole world and she uses drink to mask her loneliness and as a means to escape the real world. Susan is younger than Irene and the end of the monologues leaves you with the feeling that Irene is her future. Susan's cynical and often-ironic remarks make the monologues quite humourous. ...read more.

Middle

It is because he is 'so wrong' that the contrast between them actually draws them closer. It makes me feels as though this is the most uplifted Susan has felt for a long time. Irene's happiest time arrives at the end of her monologue, which is very unusual in Bennett's writing.The revealing last line in the ending paragraphs is about the policeman at No 56 and how "He wants reporting" Just from that one line, we know she is going to do just that, and this will lead to her imprisonment. The change in Irene is probably the most startling of all the pieces, for in prison, she finds freedom and acceptance and blossoms into a really fulfilled, busy person. It is ironic that she is forced to associate with the type of people who would have been her victims outside, and her former social conscience is at last given a practical way of expressing itself. In conventional society, Irene was a misfit; in a society of misfits, she becomes conventional. We begin by seeing Irene as a busybody, then as a malicious troublemaker and finally as an admirable, liberated woman. Prison, for Irene, is not gaol, but everyday life outside. Each monologue makes you feel sympathetic towards the characters involved because of the ordeal they have been through. ...read more.

Conclusion

Each character keeps up a pretence of "normality" and Bennett shows us, through the eye of the camera, how each person struggles to maintain a facade. The characters don't seem to talk to the audience, but at it. The final lines of both monologues are very revealing, Irene's especially. 'And I'm so happy' Previously it has been made clear that she had been very depressed for sometime so this is a startling change for her, even though she has become one of her typical victims: people that smoke, and have been to prison, and she's even beginning to consider the idea of relations with a man again. Her out come is positive and couldn't be in more contrast with Susan's bleakness through her lack of enthusiasm to better her life. We are given no indication at all whether Susan was just going to stay miserable or if she was finally become something she aspires to. I think that she fantasizes a lot, not fully thinking through it through. We had been told previously that she had fantasized about becoming a 'woman of substance' and now she is, all she can do is complain. Even though their out comes are different at this point their characters are quite similar as they require an outside force such as an introduction of another person to initiate a change within in them. As I said earlier it is as though Susan is Irene's past and Irene is Susan's future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Alan Bennet section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Alan Bennet essays

  1. How Does Alan Bennett Reveal The Speaker in 'A Lady of Letters' And Provoke ...

    However Irene fails to notice this flaw in her own character, and instead feels that she is the one being stereotyped. ''I'm an atheist'...He was a bit stumped. I could see. They don't expect you to be an atheist when you're a miss.''

  2. Studying Two Alan Bennett Monologues.

    Each of his characters, according to the author has a "single point of view" and none is "telling the whole story". He says that his characters are "artless" and "don't quite know what they are saying". This is in my view very much about the conventions he establishes.

  1. In A Lady of Letters how does Alan Bennett sustain the audiences interest in ...

    this situation shows that Miss Ruddock was wrong and that she does not care much about the 'kiddy', she cares more about the fact that she is wrong. Miss Ruddock talks quite informally to the audience as if she is having a conversation with us.

  2. Alan Bennett's "Talking Heads" monologues are described as being 'short stories'. With reference to ...

    His bathroom's got a hairdryer" whilst turning her head. Daphne Turner, author of 'Alan Bennett: In a manner of speaking' says, "Talking Heads famously betray what their minds do not know and they cannot admit to themselves". Another example that shows Lesley's naivety is when she is acting out the conversation she had with Simon.

  1. “A cream cracker under the settee” - Production Analysis

    The midwife said he wasn't fit to be called anything and had we any newspapers?" Wilfred said "Oh yes, she saves newspaper. She saves shoe boxes as well." This upset Doris we can tell this by the speech she makes, "Wrapping him in newspaper as if he was dirty.

  2. How does Alan Bennett maintain the audiences interest in A Lady of Letters?

    and show a better side of themselves. One technique Alan Bennett uses to keep the audience engaged is gradually revealing important information about Miss Ruddock, causing the audience's opinion to change. From the moment the play starts, you can see that Miss Ruddock is typically hard to please, because it

  1. How does Alan Bennett reveal to us the character of Lesley and how do ...

    Bennett often has Lesley using clich�s such as 'I didn't fall off the Christmas tree yesterday' he does this as to make her seem superficial because even though she states this, she still goes and sleeps around with men in order to fill useful and wanted.

  2. How believable did you find the transformation of Miss Ruddock in Prison?

    She is the most content she has been since her mother died maybe even in her whole life as "it's the first taste of freedom I've had in years". When Irene is helping Shirley write a letter to her imaginary boyfriend, she is showing generosity and patience, something she seemed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work