Compare and contrast the poetry of seduction through the work of Andrew Marvell and Wendy Cope

Authors Avatar

Compare and contrast the poetry of seduction through the work of Andrew Marvell and Wendy Cope

‘To His coy mistress’ was written in the 17th century by Marvell (a man). In complete contrast ‘Message’ was written in the 20th century by Cope (a woman).  It is not just the viewpoints of the two poems which are hugely different, the purpose of each are equally so.  The purpose of Marvell’s poem was to try and cajole his ‘coy mistress’ into giving up her ‘long preserv’d Virginity’, while Cope’s was to try and ease her frustration because the man she likes has failed to phone her. The difference in purpose is reflected in the type of communication in the two poems; Marvell’s is a direct address to his mistress while Cope is essentially airing her frustrations on paper, she is not directly communicating with this man but merely trying to somehow telepathically communicate with him. It is ironic that in a world full of modern communication she seems to have lost her ability to express herself.  

        Although there are some inherent differences between the poems, there are some common themes. There is a sense of getting tired of waiting in both poems; Cope is obviously tired of waiting for the man to phone her, while Marvell is tired of waiting for his mistress to lose her coyness.  There is also a sense of a lack of control in both poems, in Cope’s she is completely dependent on the man picking up the phone and calling her, in Marvell’s he is completely dependent on his mistress giving him what he wants; her body. Thus in both poems both Cope and Marvell assume passive roles. Their respective partners seem to dictate what will happen i.e. whether Marvell will make love to his mistress or whether Cope will receive that phone call.

Both Marvell and Cope seem to think that time is a major issue, they both think that you have to act while you can or else it will be too late. This desire to act so quickly in both poems in my opinion stems from the fact that they aren’t in control, they want immediately to have what they crave. They view waiting any time at all as an eternity and so both use over-exaggeration regarding the consequences of not having what they want now. Cope would like ‘to consumate our friendship while we’ve still got teeth and hair’and Marvell describes how  ‘at my back I alwaies hear Times winged Charriot hurrying near’.

Join now!

        As we have seen both Cope and Marvell are in a similar predicament, their partners both seem to be in control. However the way they respond to their dependency on their partners is vastly different. Marvell takes an active role by writing a poem which is essentially an argument suggesting why his mistress should give herself to him. Cope on the other hand does precisely nothing, she sits there and pours her emotions onto a page and telepathically urges her partner to ‘pick up the phone’. A reason why their attitudes are so different is that their relationships are at ...

This is a preview of the whole essay