Comparison of 'Our Love Now' and 'One Flesh' with 'To His Coy Mistress' and 'Rapunzstiltskin'

Authors Avatar

Comparison of  ‘Our Love Now’ and ‘One Flesh’ with ‘To His Coy Mistress’ and ‘Rapunzstiltskin’

All 4 of these poems are based round male and female relationships, each author portrays different ideas of these relationships through their poems. The first comparison I’ll make will be between ‘Our Love Now’ with ‘To His Coy Mistress’ and ‘Rapunzstiltskin’.

Martyn Lowery presents his poem as an argument with his partner. His argument and his partner’s responses are placed side by side so one can compare the two arguments. This idea of argument and convincing one’s partner to do something is also present in Andrew Marvell’s poem in which the narrator is trying to get his partner to sleep with him. However, in Marvell’s poem you only get one side of the argument which I don’t think is as affective as having both.  It does however give us insight on what the character’s personality may be like, perhaps he isn’t interested in his mistress’ response just as long as he manages to persuade her.

The use of metaphors in both poems is strong. Both writers refer to love as a living thing.  Marvell mentions a ‘My vegetable love should grow’ and Lowery mentions ‘The tree is forever dead’.  This indicates that the writers think of love as something which can grow like a living thing but can also die like something living. Both writers use this metaphor differently, Marvell uses his growing love positively whereas Lowery uses the more negative approach to love dying. However, this is because Marvell only presents the positive side to an argument, had his mistress replied she may have said something similar to Lowery’s partner.

Though Marvell doesn’t mention his love dying, he mentions ‘Time’s winged chariot’ and ‘marble vaults’. He goes on to say that ‘none, I think do there embrace’.  By this I think Marvell is implicating that love ceases only when dead, this works in favour with his argument that they should therefore make most of their love whilst alive.  Lowery’s first half of the argument seems to take a similar approach (‘damages the trees’ but ‘can be mended’, in other words they can fight death/damage and stay together).  The difference in opinion occurs when Lowery goes on to the other half of the argument, his partner’s argument implies that love can die before death, ‘the tree is forever dead’.

Join now!

Both poets use a form of flattery to get what they want, ‘Our beauty together is such’, ‘Our sweetness’, it is clear in ‘Our Love Now’ that this doesn’t work but we are not aware of what happens next in ‘To His Coy Mistress’.  Both poems share a desire for commitment, this is made obvious in Lowery’s poem, where all he really wants to do is stay with his partner. In Marvell’s poem this isn’t made quite as clear and although its obvious that the character is after sex, you can’t be sure that he wants to commit. Although ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

There is much useful and thoughtful material here. The essay writer draws upon evidence from the poems to support his/her analysis, though sometimes additional references would be helpful and in some cases conclusions are not adequately supported by the evidence. Sentence construction is mostly competent, though with a few errors in punctuation and grammar. Paragraphing is mostly too fragmented and needs revision. 3 stars