• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like?

Extracts from this document...


History Assignment 1 (How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like?) I am going to find determine the usefulness of sources a, b and c but before I can do this I must describe them. Source A was written by a British naval commander called Thomas Kerr who was actually at the battle. The source was written at the time of the battle so Thomas did not have any hindsight. He obviously considers the navy superior to the army as in the source he is putting the army down. You can tell this as he calls the army a shambles and he comments on how there weren't any officers around and any that were there were useless. From the way he tells it you get the impression that the battle must have been planned poorly from the start as he describes the men as a rabble. ...read more.


In source, B a man called Bill Elmslie is describing what he saw on the minesweeper he was serving on. The Luftwaffe are bombing from the air and also a German fighter was going across the beach with his machine gun blazing. They were firing back also. He describes how a dive-bomber sends a bomb straight towards them but at the last minute, the bomb goes wide. This source is also primary as it was written at the time without hindsight. This source well describes the scene at Dunkirk I think as the source creates an impression of a lot going on and also an impression of suspense as the dive bomber is headed towards them. This probably would be the way most of the soldiers felt at the battle. However the source does have limitations. ...read more.


This might not be as reliable as it could be as he could have made a mistake about what he saw. I think that the sources above might not be as reliable as they could be as they are only one side of the argument. There are no accounts written by people from the army or the German army or navy to describe from their point of view how the battle was fought. Also, there are no points of view from the people actually on the beaches fighting. All of the sources are written by people doing the rescuing and not the ones being rescued. This however could be good as it gives a wide spectrum of what has happened through people doing the same things eyes, which could make the sources more reliable. The sources all describe a scene of chaos which was probably correct. The most reliable source I think is source B as it gives a first hand view of bombing the beaches. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    It has nothing mentioned about the Battle of Britain, although this Battle is very important. This extract is from a loser's point of view and is not detailed; therefore it is insufficient and not useful. The next interpretation is written by one of the most known and respected historians. A.J.P.

  2. The Battle of Britain

    Combined with Russia squeezing the Germans they had to give up in May 1945. Interpretation 1 from "Germany's past" by Klaus Schultz. This also agrees that the entry of USA and Russia into the war was the undoing of Germany.

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Therefore, this combined with their patriotic feelings may have given the pilots of the Royal Air Force the edge when at battle and would have encouraged their determination. Another major factor on Britain's side was that they were fighting over friendly territory.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    He also liked the way he and is friends were national heroes for the jobs they were doing, and this almost makes him na�ve. The surprising thing about this interpretation is that it completely demonstrates the way pilots were being injured or killed; yet it was released as a source of propaganda.

  1. This essay will consist of a number of Interpretations some agreeing with the popular ...

    He is also very popular with the British people because he only writes good things about the British, therefore this piece is very one sided. The popular myth was that the Battle of Britain was the turning point of the war and "the few" saved Britain and the rest of the world from Nazism.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    Source A, an extract from a despatch by Haig, is reliable to the historian. It states three of Haig's aims of the battle the main being to relive pressure on the French at Verdun. It was to be published but the date at which it was written brings into light its reliability and purpose.

  1. Source based work on The evacuation at Dunkirk.

    The detail is high because he uses metaphors to describe so presumably this is a personal account. The person who wrote this was obviously very close to the action because it actually describes how he was almost killed.

  2. English Short Story

    enemy of our intention to surprise him, our single shrunken brigade of fifteen hundred men was sent forward without support to double up the army of General Johnston. "We will put in Hazen and see what success he has." In the words of General Wood to General Howard we were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work