• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Assignment 1 (How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like?) I am going to find determine the usefulness of sources a, b and c but before I can do this I must describe them. Source A was written by a British naval commander called Thomas Kerr who was actually at the battle. The source was written at the time of the battle so Thomas did not have any hindsight. He obviously considers the navy superior to the army as in the source he is putting the army down. You can tell this as he calls the army a shambles and he comments on how there weren't any officers around and any that were there were useless. From the way he tells it you get the impression that the battle must have been planned poorly from the start as he describes the men as a rabble. ...read more.

Middle

In source, B a man called Bill Elmslie is describing what he saw on the minesweeper he was serving on. The Luftwaffe are bombing from the air and also a German fighter was going across the beach with his machine gun blazing. They were firing back also. He describes how a dive-bomber sends a bomb straight towards them but at the last minute, the bomb goes wide. This source is also primary as it was written at the time without hindsight. This source well describes the scene at Dunkirk I think as the source creates an impression of a lot going on and also an impression of suspense as the dive bomber is headed towards them. This probably would be the way most of the soldiers felt at the battle. However the source does have limitations. ...read more.

Conclusion

This might not be as reliable as it could be as he could have made a mistake about what he saw. I think that the sources above might not be as reliable as they could be as they are only one side of the argument. There are no accounts written by people from the army or the German army or navy to describe from their point of view how the battle was fought. Also, there are no points of view from the people actually on the beaches fighting. All of the sources are written by people doing the rescuing and not the ones being rescued. This however could be good as it gives a wide spectrum of what has happened through people doing the same things eyes, which could make the sources more reliable. The sources all describe a scene of chaos which was probably correct. The most reliable source I think is source B as it gives a first hand view of bombing the beaches. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    It is still biased towards the Allies though, since it is an allied official history and is no longer a primary piece of evidence since it was written in 1957. In 1957, the Battle of Britain had begun to fall to the back of people's minds and this is when David Thomson published 'Europe Since Napoleon'.

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    The film show us that some pilots only had around 7 to 10 hours of training time in an aircraft, I know that this was true. The film stared very well known British actors, which made it very popular. Which was good for the producers, because the main thing they wanted from making this film is money.

  1. The Battle of Britain

    During the struggle over the channel from Late July to 11th August 1940 The Luftwaffe intensely bombed British shipping to test fighter command. They did inflict quite a lot of damage on the ships and destroyed 260 British Fighters. Then came Eagle attack when the entire Luftwaffe attacked Britain in wave after wave.

  2. English Short Story

    True, we did not know all this, but if any man on that ground besides Wood and Howard expected a "walkover" his must have been a singularly hopeful disposition. As topographical engineer it had been my duty to make a hasty examination of the ground in front.

  1. English Short story

    He sat erect in the saddle, holding the reins lightly in his left hand, his right hanging carelessly at his side. An occasional glimpse of his handsome profile as he turned his head one way or the other proved that the interest which he took in what was going on was natural and without affectation.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    Two months after the assault had begun the original offensive was renewed, but to no avail. The next few months, upto the end of the battle in mid-November saw torrential rain, which turned the site into a quagmire. Then, on the 13th November after an estimated 1,245,000 deaths the battle ended.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work