• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Assignment 1 (How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like?) I am going to find determine the usefulness of sources a, b and c but before I can do this I must describe them. Source A was written by a British naval commander called Thomas Kerr who was actually at the battle. The source was written at the time of the battle so Thomas did not have any hindsight. He obviously considers the navy superior to the army as in the source he is putting the army down. You can tell this as he calls the army a shambles and he comments on how there weren't any officers around and any that were there were useless. From the way he tells it you get the impression that the battle must have been planned poorly from the start as he describes the men as a rabble. ...read more.

Middle

In source, B a man called Bill Elmslie is describing what he saw on the minesweeper he was serving on. The Luftwaffe are bombing from the air and also a German fighter was going across the beach with his machine gun blazing. They were firing back also. He describes how a dive-bomber sends a bomb straight towards them but at the last minute, the bomb goes wide. This source is also primary as it was written at the time without hindsight. This source well describes the scene at Dunkirk I think as the source creates an impression of a lot going on and also an impression of suspense as the dive bomber is headed towards them. This probably would be the way most of the soldiers felt at the battle. However the source does have limitations. ...read more.

Conclusion

This might not be as reliable as it could be as he could have made a mistake about what he saw. I think that the sources above might not be as reliable as they could be as they are only one side of the argument. There are no accounts written by people from the army or the German army or navy to describe from their point of view how the battle was fought. Also, there are no points of view from the people actually on the beaches fighting. All of the sources are written by people doing the rescuing and not the ones being rescued. This however could be good as it gives a wide spectrum of what has happened through people doing the same things eyes, which could make the sources more reliable. The sources all describe a scene of chaos which was probably correct. The most reliable source I think is source B as it gives a first hand view of bombing the beaches. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    Likewise, other pilots came from Commonwealth countries including Canada, Australia, and New Zealand as well as a few from the United States. All played important roles, and despite the obvious language problems, provided vital experience that helped give the British the fighting chance they needed.

  2. English Short Story

    True, we did not know all this, but if any man on that ground besides Wood and Howard expected a "walkover" his must have been a singularly hopeful disposition. As topographical engineer it had been my duty to make a hasty examination of the ground in front.

  1. English Short story

    to their feet, and swarming into the open sent broad sheets of bullets against the blazing crest of the offending works, which poured an answering fire into their unprotected groups with deadly effect. The artillery on both sides joined the battle, punctuating the rattle and roar with deep, earth-shaking explosions

  2. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Following the grinding battles of the 18th, exhaustion and the weather reduced operations for most of a week, allowing the Luftwaffe to review their performance. The "Hardest Day" had sounded the end for the Ju 87 Stuka dive-bomber in the campaign.

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    The source is biased as it omits key objectives - such as gaining land, looking at source I we can tell this did happen. Haig was known for his "break-through" tactics, which opposed his assistant's attrition methods; Haig's true plans are made clear in this source.

  2. The Battle of Britain.

    Churchill made many speeches during the war and they got more powerful and moving as time progressed. One of his speeches during 1940 described the Battle as 'Britain's finest hour'. The speech came in two parts. The first part was read on the 18th June, and the second on the 20th August.

  1. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    lost then Britain would fall to Nazism and slowly so would the whole world. In his speeches Churchill uses emotive, appealing and persuasive language and he glorifies the R.A.F.. These speeches were used mainly for propaganda and a way of boosting Churchill's leadership and popularity, also to boost morale in

  2. The battle of the Somme - This analysis is to debate whether or not ...

    However whether the battle should have been fought or not cannot be determined by this source, this source just shows that the Germans were more prepared for what they faced, than the British army. Source D is Russel Bradshaw, a soldiers account of the crossing of no man's land.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work