• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like?

Extracts from this document...


History Assignment 1 (How useful are sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle for Dunkirk was like?) I am going to find determine the usefulness of sources a, b and c but before I can do this I must describe them. Source A was written by a British naval commander called Thomas Kerr who was actually at the battle. The source was written at the time of the battle so Thomas did not have any hindsight. He obviously considers the navy superior to the army as in the source he is putting the army down. You can tell this as he calls the army a shambles and he comments on how there weren't any officers around and any that were there were useless. From the way he tells it you get the impression that the battle must have been planned poorly from the start as he describes the men as a rabble. ...read more.


In source, B a man called Bill Elmslie is describing what he saw on the minesweeper he was serving on. The Luftwaffe are bombing from the air and also a German fighter was going across the beach with his machine gun blazing. They were firing back also. He describes how a dive-bomber sends a bomb straight towards them but at the last minute, the bomb goes wide. This source is also primary as it was written at the time without hindsight. This source well describes the scene at Dunkirk I think as the source creates an impression of a lot going on and also an impression of suspense as the dive bomber is headed towards them. This probably would be the way most of the soldiers felt at the battle. However the source does have limitations. ...read more.


This might not be as reliable as it could be as he could have made a mistake about what he saw. I think that the sources above might not be as reliable as they could be as they are only one side of the argument. There are no accounts written by people from the army or the German army or navy to describe from their point of view how the battle was fought. Also, there are no points of view from the people actually on the beaches fighting. All of the sources are written by people doing the rescuing and not the ones being rescued. This however could be good as it gives a wide spectrum of what has happened through people doing the same things eyes, which could make the sources more reliable. The sources all describe a scene of chaos which was probably correct. The most reliable source I think is source B as it gives a first hand view of bombing the beaches. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE War Poetry essays

  1. English Short Story

    A soldier sprang forward to his place and fell also as he grasped the color-staff. A second and third followed successively, and each received death as speedily as his predecessors. A fourth, however, seized and bore back the object of soldierly devotion."

  2. War at Sea.

    It would have immense effect on German morale. The blockade would be more successful as there would be no threat form the German Navy.

  1. English Short story

    to their feet, and swarming into the open sent broad sheets of bullets against the blazing crest of the offending works, which poured an answering fire into their unprotected groups with deadly effect. The artillery on both sides joined the battle, punctuating the rattle and roar with deep, earth-shaking explosions

  2. Why did Britain win the battle of Britain?

    Emergency measures had to be taken to keep the sectors operating. These were desperate times for the RAF, which was also taking many casualties in the air. Aircraft production could replace aircraft but replacement pilots were barely keeping place with losses, and novice flyers were being shot down in droves.

  1. Why did Britain win the Battle of Britain?

    These figures indicate that Germany lost almost double the amount of planes than Britain and this may be the reason why Britain won the Battle of Britain as Germany lost far more planes. Recent research indicates that Hitler's heart was not in an attack on Britain but that he wanted

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    The source is biased as it omits key objectives - such as gaining land, looking at source I we can tell this did happen. Haig was known for his "break-through" tactics, which opposed his assistant's attrition methods; Haig's true plans are made clear in this source.

  1. The Battle of Britain.

    Churchill knew that people would relate to and therefore sympathize with such young men. The sacrifice of 'the young' is a powerful image, which is why it is partially an attempt to draw America into the war on Britain's side.

  2. The popular myth of the Battle of Britain quickly emerged during the early part ...

    But his speeches don't mention Dowding; this is because I know that Churchill did not agree on issues with Dowding. Churchill is biased and nationalistic in his speeches because at the end of the day he himself knows that they are a good form of propaganda.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work