• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is Richard III a Machiavellian character and does he ultimately benefit from this?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Is Richard III a Machiavellian character and does he ultimately benefit from this? The dictionary definition of a Machiavellian character is: Being or acting in accordance with the principles of government analyzed in Machiavelli's The Prince, in which political expediency is placed above morality and the use of craft and deceit to maintain the authority and carry out the policies of a ruler is described. Machiavellian behaviour is characterized by subtle or unscrupulous cunning, deception, expediency, or dishonesty. The part in the play which I think epitomizes Richard's Machiavellian character is his cunning plan to turn his two brothers, George Duke of Clarence and King Edward IV against each other. ...read more.

Middle

Your brother Gloucester hates you. CLARENCE O, no, he loves me and holds me dear! ..... FIRST MURDERER ... Come, you deceive yourself; 'Tis he that sends us here to destroy you here. CLARENCE It cannot be, for he bewept my fortune, And hugged me in his arms, and swore with sobs That he would labour my delivery. One Moment in the play where Richard shows much cunning and deceitfulness is in Act One where Richard is seducing Lady Anne the widow of the Prince of Lancaster. Richard says that he has never cried, not even at his father's funeral but says that Anne's refusal to marry him makes him cry. ...read more.

Conclusion

After the beheading of Hastings, Richard had to persuade the Mayor of London that Hastings killing was justified. So Richard and Richmond dressed in rusty armour (Stage direction says; Enter Richard, Duke of Gloucester, and Buckingham, in rotten armour, marvellous ill-favoured). This cunning move makes him appear weak just like when he was seducing Anne where in actual fact it is Richard who holds all the cards. So therefore, in my interpretation of a Machiavellian character, Richard is a Machiavellian. Does he benefit from it? I think that he does. Richard, a deformed man, can never exist in a peaceful world but on a battlefield is equal to any man. To gain this war Richard used Machiavellian "techniques/tactics" so that he could live. Without his Machiavellian side Richard probably would have stayed under his brother's shadows, shunned by his mother. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Richard III section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Richard III essays

  1. Shakespeare's presentation of the character of Richard III

    those people who are deformed and, superstitiously speaking, therefore have committed sin or work for the devil. By the end of the play Shakespeare has clearly portrayed how he feels, all the characters in the play which show trust towards Richard and speak the truth around Richard are betrayed or

  2. Richard III by William Shakespeare - 'How much sympathy do you have for the ...

    (1.3.line 246-7) and seemingly does so to prove to the others that he is not worried about the denunciation by overtly putting on a bravado. In this scene, not much sympathy is inflicted towards Hastings, as although he seems to be deterred by the curse, he puts it to the back of

  1. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    He is a graceful villain. He carries out all his deeds and crimes in a slick and shrewd way so that no one suspects what he is up to but the audience. Being extremely witty, he is more of a criminal mastermind than a simple villain.

  2. 'In his depiction of Richard III Shakespeare has created much more than a simple ...

    than a simple theatrical villain, we gain a hint of the scorn and hatred he really has. A 'simple' theatrical villain would not be, in this way, like Richard. Using a simple two lines Shakespeare conveys to the reader that Richard is much more complicated than a simple theatrical villain.

  1. 'Is Richard III a 'bloody tyrant and a homicide' or 'a man of great ...

    Although he collapses mentally the night before the battle at Bosworth, he finds that he is forced to confront the reality of something he chose to ignore. It can be argued that this lack of acceptance led to his downfall.

  2. Richard III by William Shakespeare - “How genuine was the relationship between Richard and ...

    prophesies their ruin, except Buckingham, simply for the reason that he had no involvement in the death of her husband, and warns the company against Richard. When she leaves, it is ironic that Buckingham is the first to speak, and even more so that he mocks her by claiming "My

  1. How Genuine was the Relationship Between Richard and Buckingham?

    This is very interesting, as at this point we are still in the dark about the fact that the allegiance between Richard and Buckingham has already been finalised. Shakespeare has deliberately not told us this yet so as to view the scene as described above.

  2. Richard III's Character in the Play and History

    During his speech to his soldiers rather than announcing to them positives he can only speak negatively about his opposition, "A sort of vagabonds, rascals and runaways," This shows some desperation. Anne then calls Richard 'the devil' and says, "Avaunt," to him as though she were banishing him and he were a supernatural being.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work