• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different As the campaign for women's suffrage developed many women in the NUWSS (suffragists) became dissatisfied with the campaign and how little it was progressing. These women then formed a new organisation called the WSPU (suffragettes). The suffragists campaigned for only votes for women and preferred to use more peaceful ways of expressing their opinions and objections. However the suffragettes campaigned for better working and living conditions for women and were more forceful and aggressive in their methods of protests. Although their approach to achieving their aim was very different, their objectives remained essentially the same: securing women's suffrage. The tactics of the two groups were fundamentally different. The suffragist used tactics of persuasion to gain public and government support such as leaflets, posters and petition. On the other hand the suffragettes used aggressive tactics that forced people to meet their demands. ...read more.

Middle

A lot of leaflets posters and petitions were used in addition meetings were held in almost all constituencies which aided public awareness throughout the campaign. Millicent Fawcett was a very influential figure in deciding which tactics the NUWSS used and she herself went to many public debates with her opponents. Among the many differences there was also a geographical difference. The suffragists were based in Manchester and the suffragettes in London. This difference was essential for the suffragettes. They needed to be in a large city so all their shocking activity could have maximum impact. London was especially good because apart from the large population the suffragettes could attack the houses of parliament, Buckingham Palace and Downing Street as well as all the politicians based there. There were thirty four branches of WSPU in London alone. Both the Suffragists and Suffragettes had very influential and powerful leaders and personalities. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many people regarded the suffragists with sympathy but did not pay much attention to them unless it was an election time. Opinion towards the suffragettes changed. Initially many people in Britain thought the police and government overacted to the suffragettes. For example people believed that imprisoning and force feeding them was too harsh and this enticed new members into the organisation. Even the suffragists admired their courage. However as they became increasingly violent public opinion turned against them and many moderate suffragettes left It was not clear which organisation was more effective in securing the votes for women. Whilst the suffragist movement tried to work with people and use moderate tactics such as leaflets, petitions and meeting, the suffragette had much broader aims which were better working and living conditions for women and were prepared to use violent and dramatic tactics to attract attention. So essentially the most significant difference was the tactics they used to achieve their aim. Another key difference was that one seemed to be working well and under control whereas the other seemed finally itself to be out of control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    as a measure, though because the women just committed criminal damage when let out. Suffragettes retaliated with a lot of physical action, in stark comparison to the Suffragists who tried to be rational and still followed their original motto - make haste slowly with persuasion .

  2. The Suffragettes.

    Emily Davison's actions caused her own death, the death of a horse and injury to another human being (the jockey.) In my opinion I believe her publicity stunt not to be worthwhile. She willing put her life and another human beings life at risk and killed an animal.

  1. Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    As this was the main group of suffrage societies they were very tolerant of different methods. They were also tolerant of the violent methods of the WSPU until 1912. The WSPU lost the support of the NUWSS. They said that the WSPU's campaigning was going out of hand and that

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

    Sylvia Pankhurst described the party's aims "To create an impression upon the public throughout the country, to set everyone talking about the votes for women, to keep the subject in the press, to leave the government no peace from it".

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the Suffragettes were ...

    They opposed liberal candidates who supported votes for women as well as those who did not. This was because, as they saw it, the existing government would not grant women's suffrage and the best way to bring it down was to oppose all of its supporters.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    mp but not in a high rank that supported them and felt it was right for women to get certain rights. They also tried to bully the parties such as the liberal democrats, conservatives or labour to adopt women's rights as the policy of the party, policy of the party

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes were ...

    These bills included giving the right to vote to female householders. The suffragists used marches and demonstrations to boost their campaigns and get more men, as well as more women to join them The NUWSS even staged rallies which they performed against the law, so people who were at rallies were arrested.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    These women came mainly from the middle classes and kept with puritanical views on their dress and actions, they did not undertake any outrageous actions and relied on the power of words to get through to the general public. Suffragists used methods such as petitions, leaflets and public meetings to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work