• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The campaign for women's suffrage was formally founded by the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS), in 1897. These women worked hard for women's votes but were largely unsuccessful with their method of campaign. In 1903, women broke away from the NUWSS and took matters into their own hands, using entirely different forms of protest. The NUWSS's aim was for 'votes for women', but this did not necessarily include all women. This campaign aimed to place women level with men, who already had the vote. The movement took place in major cities, which meant women could support the campaign, no matter where they lived. The suffragists believed in constitutional peaceful campaigning such as; issuing leaflets, presenting petitions, arguing cases with MP's in an orderly manner and other methods. ...read more.

Middle

The suffragists received promises of support from MPs, but little was actually done. Many other organisations were set up to work alongside the NUWSS to gain women's votes. An organised group which branched off from NUWSS was the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU), founded by the Pankhurst family in 1903. From this came the 'suffragettes', whose approach to the vote was very different. The campaign was open to women only and it aimed for all women to be granted the vote. The women in this movement took a different approach and aimed to stir things up and gain press coverage. In 1906 the Liberal Party won the general election, and the women's votes were seemingly more likely. ...read more.

Conclusion

But this didn't stop the suffragettes from continuing their violent campaign. Once arrested, many women asked to be treated as political prisoners, but were refused. Braver women acted in further protest to this and went on hunger strike, but were harshly force-fed by prison doctors and workers. The actions of WSPU members had caused both NUWSS members, politicians and the Prime Minister to publicly dislike the party - their actions disgusted politicians for acting brash and unwomanly, but simply embarrassed the suffragists. The actions of the violent suffragettes made many men who had supported the campaign for women's votes now turned their support to men's franchise. The NUWSS were ashamed of the society's actions because they were giving the fight for women's suffrage a bad name. The two campaigns differed greatly, although they fought for the same thing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Towards the end of 1916, German submarines were destroying monthly about 300,000 tons of British and Allied shipping in the North Atlantic; in April 1917, the figure was 875,000 tons. Because the Germans had calculated that the destruction of 600,000 tons monthly for six consecutive months would be sufficient to

  2. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    women and therefore their tactics weren t controversial and thus they rarely gained media attention. Other women felt as if the politicians weren t taking the suffragists seriously, due to lack of direct action and felt as if they had to change their tactics, as they were barley progressing or making any significant difference.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    Millicent Fawcett was a respectable, well-educated woman so this meant that she could use the power of words to get her opinions across. She saw her role as a co-ordinator; she didn't consider herself to be in charge but to give the effort of the other Suffragists some guidance.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    There were many incidents across the country of window smashing and other attacks against property. The Daily Telegraph described one event, "women who a moment earlier appeared to be on a peaceful shopping trip produced hammers, stones and sticks from their bags and began to attack the nearest window".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work