• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different... In 1897 the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS) was set up. This brought together 500 local organizations with more than 50,000 members, headed by Millicent Fawcett. The organization used peaceful and legal ways to try and win the vote for women. But some women decided that lawful tactics weren't enough and chose to use more aggressive methods to achieve their goals. These women, headed by the Pankhurst family, set up their own organization called the Womens Social and Political Union (WSPU) and became known as the 'Suffragettes'. To distinguish between the two, members of the NUWSS where labeled 'Suffragists'. ...read more.

Middle

But these methods seemed to have little to no effect on the situation as many of the bills that were introduced into the House of Commons, due to their ongoing efforts, were either rejected or talked out. The Suffragettes, after witnessing the Suffragists lack of progress decided to take things into their own hands. Unfortunately their methods did not limit themselves within the law. Suffragettes adopted almost terrorist-like mentalities and were prepared to act outside the law using violent and unlawful means. Along with participating in Suffragist-like means of protest, Suffragettes were known to have harassed MP's, taken part in stone throwing, disturbed political meetings, destroyed property, heckled Cabinet Ministers and to the dismay of prisons around the country, adopted a firm stance on hunger striking as a weapon. ...read more.

Conclusion

As a result, people began to take notice and women's suffrage became a major issue. This taught the Suffragettes, in their eyes, an invaluable lesson: militancy 'paid off'. Putting aside their differences, one thing that both Suffragettes and Suffragists had to deal with was 'factionalism'. Throughout the campaigns both camps had divisions throughout their membership ranging from geographical location to social status. This meant that it was almost impossible for the leaders of the organizations to control the actions of each and every faction. One thing that did aid the Suffragists cause was their affiliations to political parties and influential MP's, something which the Suffragettes could not rely on. This was mainly down to the openness of the Suffragists to outside support and compromises along with the fact that Suffragettes antagonized parties and the public resulting in little to no support or sympathy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    The 18th of November 1910 became known as Black Friday. This led to a procession in 1911 consisting of 60,000 people from both groups called the Women s coronation procession, at this stage despite having very different attitudes towards the campaign, the NUWSS and WSPU still came together on occasions

  2. Campaing for WOmens Rights

    that they would stop all political activities to help and contribute to the war. 4 days later the WSPU decided to stop their militant actions also. Now both suffragettes and suffragists were halting their campaigns. Only one other big group - The Women's Freedom league - continued campaigning.

  1. Describe the Ways in Which the Methods Of The

    They also cut telegraph wires. The illegal actions of the Suffragettes meant that it was more likely that they would get arrested. This led to a new form of political protest, hunger striking. The Suffragettes when imprisoned would refuse to eat and the prisons didn't want death on their records so they had no choice but to release the women.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    They used peaceful, legal tactics to try to win support also they sent petitions to Parliament, wrote letters to MPs, distributed leaflets and organised meetings.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    She believed that they would win the right to vote by the weight of their argument and the weight of their support. They believed that their case was so strong that they didn't want to damage it by using civil disobedience or violence.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    The aim of the WSPU it was declared to be obtaining the vote for women "on the same terms which it is, or may be, granted to men". The reason that Emmeline Pankhurst left the NUWSS was because she had become frustrated at the NUWSS's lack of success.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work