• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced by the United StatesSoldiers in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced by the United States Soldiers in Vietnam? Source a was published 17 years after the War, (Vietnam; 1964-1975).In this time more information was made available, but witnesses accounts maybe inaccurate due to this lapse in time The author is an American journalist, not a solider or frontline reporter, so his experience is not first hand. Consequently the text's "slant" is different. The title displays limitations; it's likely to be biased as it refers to the My Lai massacre. When in four hours, on an early Saturday morning in March 1968, between 300-400 villagers were killed as a regular search and destroy mission went terribly wrong. Under official orders, Unit Charlie Company had details the area; My Lai, was housing Vietcong members and sympathiser the unit had also been instructed that the villagers had left for market as it was a Saturday; the unit were under the impression to kill all who were left. But in reality no Vietcong were found or killed, only villagers, as they hadn't all left for market. ...read more.

Middle

This is not true. Because, the American forces were not conscripted at the same time, soldiers did not finish the tour of duty together. Consequently the army was a range of skills, "all the time", rookie to officer. And how a maximum of 40% of recruits ever returned home The source is biased, showing narrow mindedness. There's no balance of advantages or disadvantages. E.g. "The tour of duty, in Vietnam was one year. Soldiers were likely to die in that year." There are advantages, such as; an enthusiastic, energetic and fresh army. There are no figures, to support this quote. It doesn't mention American Soldiers had to differentiate between peasants and Vietcong. Neither does it mention the pressure on recruits; like, the 1968 Tet offensive, (Vietcong launched a major attack towards America. 70,000 VC soldiers took America by surprise on Tet holiday, 1500 U.S army killed). Or of the anti war movement, which effected a soldiers motivation, "I kill to live" a U.S private quoted, A view formed from the one sided media coverage perhaps? ...read more.

Conclusion

This is important as the methodical use of this warfare proved a challenge to America, due to it being scenario America was not accustomed to. Through out the war America found no real answer to this tactic. Perfected by Mao tse-tung's red army It required Vietcong units to operate as individuals, eliminating the enemy by retreating and returning to battle any survivors. The main aim was to exhaust the enemy. Guerrilla fighters summarised the tactics like so; * The enemy attacks, we retreat. * The enemy camps, we raid. * The enemy tire, we attack. * The enemy retreats, we pursue. Neither does it mention the psychological effect this had on its victims; The American army. How soldiers were constantly at fear of losing their life; through ambush, surprise, and especially to the horrific use of deadly, unhygienic and the most painful booby traps and mines. 11% of America deaths were due to this and even if troops did not come in contact with such traps, the very fear drove many men to state of mental incapacity, even long after the war. Consequently I don't agree with source a's interpretation of problems faced by united statues soldiers, because it does not justify what it is implying. ?? ?? ?? ?? Glenn Bridges 10BT ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    Of course we already know that he was tied down by the American policies especially the Truman doctrine, but he could have also have got involved in Vietnam without actually having to send American soldiers down there. Johnson knew that if he didn't act upon communist actions that it would

  2. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    There are a number of possibilities such as the GI's in Charlie company for committing the atrocities, or Lieutenant Calley who should have stopped his GI's from killing or Calley's superiors and the United States government for training them to kill and creating the situation for this type of atrocity

  1. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    The result of this continuing spiral of poor strategy and younger and younger recruits et al. meant many of the objectives which had been planned, ultimately failed in response to the effort which was being put in; low morale in existing, serving soldiers also played its part.

  2. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced by united states soldiers ...

    These were very frustrating for the US soldiers as they caused 11% of all GI deaths and there was nobody around to take revenge on immediately after one struck somebody. Also they were mainly aimed to maim the soldiers and not to kill them, for example one trap is a camouflaged ditch about a foot deep.

  1. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    However this backfired badly as the chemical destroyed the natural habitat of various animals and also got into the water supply. The napalm and the Agent Orange would have been seen on television and linked to the loss of the war as the defoliation and burns on people's bodies would have been viewed by millions on the television.

  2. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced by United States soldiers ...

    On the other hand, we can question the reliability of the source as it is only an extract from the book 'Four hours in My Lai', it could contain more important information and useful facts which does not appear in the extract in Source A, an historian would need to see more information for it to be reliable.

  1. Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973

    Firstly, one of the main reasons leading to the withdrawal of US troops was the media. The Vietnam war was the first ever to have full scale news attention, which meant effectively the Americans sitting at home could see just as much as what a soldier fighting would.

  2. 'Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973'

    The US congress agreed but didn't want to be seen fighting for colonialism, so they wanted France to declare Indo-China independent. France said No. International agreements were still important to maintain peace between nations, yet many believe nothing could be achieved from the agreement at Geneva.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work