• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does General Haig deserve the title Butcher of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...


Does General Haig deserve the title 'Butcher of the Somme'? In this essay I will discus whether General Haig deserves to be remembered as 'the butcher of the Somme'. General Haig's title of 'the butcher of the Somme' originated after the First World War, when, due to large number of casualties Britain suffered from the war and mostly the Somme. The people of Britain wanted someone to blame. This was a coping mechanism in which people could deal with the loss of the 'lost generation'. Arguably Haig does deserve his nickname. This is because Haig sent thousands of men to their deaths continuously after his war efforts seemed not to be working. For instance 60,000 soldiers died in the first day alone in the battle of the Somme. The reason that so many people died was that Haig ordered his men to walk across no-mans land. They were easy targets for the German machine guns. ...read more.


therefore he ordered his men to walk across no-mans land and look for mines. This shows that he thought about what to do and what was in the best interest for his men as there was no point in telling his men to run across no-mans land to be blown up by mines. It is debatable that Haig deserves his nickname as, while his men are starving in the cold and muddy trench, Haig is sipping French wine in cosy ch�teau miles away from the fighting. This shows that he only cared for himself, not for the hard fighting soldiers. Haig did not spend his time on the front line with his men, but stayed away from the direct fighting. This was done not so he could live a luxurious life, but so he was able to see a further stretch of the trenches and plan his tactics accordingly. This is compared to being on the front line and only seeing a small area of the battle field and would therefore have less well planned tactics as they would only take a small proportion of the trenches into account. ...read more.


Therefore either way Haig would be considered a 'butcher'. In conclusion I believe that Haig does not deserve his title of 'the butcher of the Somme'. If the objective for a general to be successful is to win wars, then Haig must be judged as a success. Yes he sent thousands of men to their deaths, however in a war of attrition and with the limited amount of military tactics available that was the only way to win. There would always be a scapegoat for the death tolls of The Great War and are we forgetting that Haig was ordered by the government to get a large scale win? Therefore it is perfect for the government; if Haig is successful they can win the war. They also have someone to blame after the war is over thus making the public hold Haig responsible for the deaths tolls not the government. Perhaps Haig could be viewed, much like the soldiers he sent over the top as a puppet of the government. Therefore Haig does not deserve the title 'the butcher of the Somme'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Overall, this is an excellent response that answers the question well and is focused throughout. The author does well to support points with concise evidence but also ensures that both sides of the debate are considered before reaching a conclusion. The introduction is the weakest area and could have included a line of argument. 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 21/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Why did World War One break out in 1914?

    Because of his great ambitions, Germany and England went head to head in a naval arms race which meant him and his cousin competing against each other causing rivalry and increased tension between the nations. The assignation of Arch Duke Kaiser Wilhelm was the trigger for WWI and is arguably the most important factor to why war broke out.

  2. Evaluate the impact of the First World War on the social, economic and political ...

    However, the prime minister didn't give in. Even by 1914, they still didn't get the vote. But in 1914, the war broke out and both groups stopped campaigning to help with the war. At the start of the war, all campaigns were suspended both by the suffragettes and suffragist: "Women,

  1. Case study: The Battle of the Somme.

    The Germans were terrified. The ground gained on that day was more than on any other. The tanks were very unreliable and failed to cause a breakthrough. The opportunity for the surprise use of tanks was over and some historians saw this as an opportunity squandered and criticise Haig for bad judgement.

  2. How were the lives of women on the home front affected by the First ...

    Well they have work....................I would find it impossible to oppose them getting the vote". Basically, what he trying to do was letting the people know about his changed view possibly with a thought on his political future. Women also faced with some problems as a result of changes happened to them during the World War 1.

  1. Women in world war one

    Before the war he was divergent to it. Women shifting his mind and achieving this was a major breakthrough for them politically. And this political change is significant because it meant women could vote and in turn let their voices be heard. The source is very useful in helping us to understand why some men were convinced by

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    the war would be a sensitive subject for the public so to be too critical he may not sell many copies of his book. The author being British and in the RAF could cause the source to be bias as he seems patriotic.

  1. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    This suggests that generals were cowardly as Haig was 15 miles away from the battlefield and was often in a cosy hotel while his men went and fought and died. This also shows that the British public know this and criticise him for it six months after the battle.

  2. How much impact did music have on society 1955-75?

    to focus on themes such as relationships: ?Everyday it's a-gettin' closer, Goin' faster than a rollercoaster, Love like yours will surely come my way?, compared to the later music which incited changes in social attitudes towards substances such as drugs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work