• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk was a Great Deliverance and a Great Disaster

Extracts from this document...


Dunkirk was a Great Deliverance and a Great Disaster Is there sufficient evidence in sources D-I to support this? A.J.P Taylor is a very respected British historian and for him to come up with such a contradictory quote there must have been some sort of evidence and a meaning to it, so to determine whether it was a deliverance or disaster we need to assess the positives and negatives of the evacuation, then decide on the sources reliability and utility to conclude if there is sufficient evidence. Source D was painted by Charles Cundall and he was given an artistic license, which means he didn't have to produce an accurate painting. The fact that he is British means he would have probably produced a painting the aim of which would have been to keep the morale of the British population high and contributed to the Dunkirk myth. This source agrees with the quote "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster" as it shows men being rescued, the Blitzkrieg attack and boats that have capsized. ...read more.


The picture in itself however tells us very little apart from the fact we cannot see columns of men waiting to be rescued or any boats close by. Source G was part of a speech by Anthony Eden, the Minister of War. As it was made after the evacuation it is a secondary source albeit not by much and the fact that he was British and a Minister it is obviously biased. (Conversely, he was high up so will have had access to government archives and therefore has an intelligent opinion on the state of the BEF). Apart from "we have had great losses in equipment" there were no negatives and it was based heavily on improving public morale so would try to be picturing it as a deliverance; it did not mention the thousands of men lost or taken prisoner or any other bad points. The evidence in this source isn't sufficient enough to agree or disagree with the interpretation that "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." ...read more.


He is also the writer of the quote that the question is based on and supports it with evidence in the source such as "almost the entire BEF was saved" but also put forward the losses such as "Six destroyers had been sunk and nineteen damaged" and "The RAF had lost 474 planes" The source is a balanced view of Dunkirk. It mentions both the negative and positive aspects. Although the writer was the one who made the quote and provides evidence to support it, there is too much evidence providing different information for it to prove the quote right. In conclusion, Sources D and G both show the good and bad sides of the evacuation and corroborate with Source I which involves both in detail. Whereas, Sources E and F are unreliable as could be staged and neither point towards either deliverance or disaster and Source H agree with Source I in facts and opinion. Therefore the majority of evidence shows it was both a great deliverance and a great disaster because of the circumstances and what we know happened and will happen. ?? ?? ?? ?? By Ben Davies ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Source 4 tells us that the returning army left behind most of its heavy equipment 600 tanks lost, more than 1000 filed guns, 850 anti-tank guns and a large number of lorries cars and motorbikes were left in France. I have gathered from this source that the fleeing solders did

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    which tell of Dunkirk Spirit. The source has some strengths such as I know that many soldiers were severely fatigued and it is a primary, first hand eye witness account. Also as it was written by a historian you would expect it to be well balanced and researched.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    German morale was at an all time high, and a retreating B.E.F wasn't exactly going to harm this. The first defeatist source is a picture taken at the beaches of Dunkirk in which trucks are built onto the sea to facilitate the evacuation, some may see it as brilliant improvisation

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    heavy equipment, 600 tanks were lost, more than 1000 filed guns, 850 anti-tank guns and a large number of lorries cars and motorbikes were left in France. This just shows me how much machinery was actually lost, and that Britain's factory workers had to work hard to replace the amount of equipment lost in Dunkirk.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    This interviewee is (or was) obviously of a higher class background and claims that 'It was just as upsetting for a clean and well-educated child to find itself in a grubby semi-slum as the other way round.' I t is quite apparent that this person had somewhat of a difficult

  2. Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster

    For most of the time the beaches were in chaos as men hid in the sand while Stukas flew over head. The men had no weaponry or artillery as these had been destroyed. The need to retreat shows Dunkirk was a disaster as the battle for France could not be won.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    the information was more valid since it was changed by many people. The detail is also something that makes it more reliable since it isn?t just one sentence. The audience are GCSE students and the facts have to be correct so in conclusion i think this text is reliable.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    There are several sources to demonstrate this. Source C, a primary source is a cartoon by David Low, it was published in the London Evening Standard and was published in the 1900s, (assuming around 1915). It shows a soldier (possibly British)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work