Evaluation of sources for the sufficiency, drawing conclusions from evidence - "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster".

Authors Avatar

Evaluation of sources for the sufficiency, drawing conclusions from evidence

“Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster”

When I analyzed source A there is various evidence which supports the statement “Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster” because it shows allied troops being evacuated from Dunkirk however it seemed as though they were boarding the ships without much trouble so that doesn’t show any disaster. Nevertheless there is a ship in the sea which is sinking and also shows English planes being shot down by the Luftwaffe, it also shows bombs falling near British troops, and the painting also shows bombs falling close to British soldiers and clouds of black smoke of fallen aircraft. All these are signs are of a disaster on the beaches of Dunkirk.

The painting should show an even worse disaster of weapons scattered on the ground and disbanded groups of troops. However not including these images helped keep morale up.

Join now!

The deliverance that operation Dynamo aimed to give was also not shown in source B because it show lines of soldiers waiting on the beaches and it seems as though they are not in any trouble and under fire from the Nazis. Since source B is a photo and not a painting which can be expressed in different ways it is a more reliable source than the painting because it can not be altered for propaganda purposes.  However this photo could’ve been captured before operation dynamo had commenced.

Source D is a speech prepared by Anthony Eden; he ...

This is a preview of the whole essay