• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use sources A to C and knowledge from your studies to answer. The wartime Generals have been greatly criticized for the mistakes made during the First World War. People blamed the generals because they made decisions that got millions of people killed while they sat in bunkers a safe distance away from the fighting. This issue was so controversial that films were made about it and also a very famous book called "Lions led by Donkeys". Assessing these sources, I will find out how reliable they are and what the soldiers thought of their generals at the time. ...read more.

Middle

This source only tells us that the general public at the time either thought that or were under the impression that the generals were not very good. Source C, a statement by Earl Haig, the son of Douglas Haig, although to some extent he is trying to protect his father he puts across some valid points. He says that the soldiers during the war never criticized the generals, it was only the people after the war that started to criticize them. He also said that serious historians were coming to the view that the war had to be thought to the end, people like Dr Gary Sheffield who wrote the book "Lions Led by Donkeys?" was one of the historians that that agreed with this. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the end of the day this program was designed to make money and make people laugh otherwise it would not have been a success, they would have changed things and used the opinion of the public to get the laughs they needed. Although none of these sources are really that reliable source, C is probably the most reliable. I already know from my studies that people after the war blamed the generals for the mistakes and loss of life, and that people during the war did not really complain, so this shows that source C is at least telling part of the truth. Overall these sources are not really that useful for finding out the opinions of the old soldiers. A part of a soldier's diary would have been better or something else similar would have been a lot more useful. Jacob Parker 11 Turner ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Is the statement "Lions led by Donkeys" accurate? To answer this question, I will ...

    Looking at evidence from back when the war was in its gruelling stages, letters home from the soldiers revealed no distaste for Field Marshal Haig, in fact, they had great faith in his plans.

  2. Were Lions led by donkeys in World war one?

    The source implies that Haig was a good General, and that he won the war, which was what he was asked to do, and that the loss of lives was unavoidable. However, this source may not be very reliable, because of a number of reasons.

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    It supports the interpretation as it describes how many soldiers had to deal with difficult conditions and unrealistic tasks made by the generals which were not practiced before hand.

  2. 'The British offensive on the Sommewas doomed to be a disaster from the start ...

    The communication shows Haig asking for 'More guns' 'More shells' 'More men'. This clearly shows how desperate Haig is and shows us how badly things must be going at the Somme front because Haig already had more than enough men and firepower to accomplish what he planned to do.

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Source C is biased not because it was written by Haig's son (however I'm sure that is part of the reason for his view) but because it does not refer to any hard evidence for the reasons it puts forward, it is an opinion rather than a view.

  2. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    At the turn of the 20th century, there was a huge difference between the lifestyles of Working class and Upper class women. Source A4 suggests that Middle class women at the time lived a hard life, serving others and performing such tasks as cleaning whole houses daily, hauling heavy objects

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys' How Valid is this Interpretation of the Conduct of the ...

    This would reinforce the opinion that the generals were donkeys as the soldiers were being led by men who were not fully qualified. In source B3 Haig comes over extremely heartless and didn't seem to care about how many soldiers were injured or killed as long as the war was won by Britain.

  2. Study Sources B and C. Which Source is more useful as evidence about the ...

    This may point out the inaccuracy of the source. However this maybe due to the fact that the interview was made in 1988. The eyewitness may have misremembered as the event was over 40 years ago. Although this was an isolated incident and does not reflect any of the other

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work