• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use sources A to C and knowledge from your studies to answer. The wartime Generals have been greatly criticized for the mistakes made during the First World War. People blamed the generals because they made decisions that got millions of people killed while they sat in bunkers a safe distance away from the fighting. This issue was so controversial that films were made about it and also a very famous book called "Lions led by Donkeys". Assessing these sources, I will find out how reliable they are and what the soldiers thought of their generals at the time. ...read more.

Middle

This source only tells us that the general public at the time either thought that or were under the impression that the generals were not very good. Source C, a statement by Earl Haig, the son of Douglas Haig, although to some extent he is trying to protect his father he puts across some valid points. He says that the soldiers during the war never criticized the generals, it was only the people after the war that started to criticize them. He also said that serious historians were coming to the view that the war had to be thought to the end, people like Dr Gary Sheffield who wrote the book "Lions Led by Donkeys?" was one of the historians that that agreed with this. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the end of the day this program was designed to make money and make people laugh otherwise it would not have been a success, they would have changed things and used the opinion of the public to get the laughs they needed. Although none of these sources are really that reliable source, C is probably the most reliable. I already know from my studies that people after the war blamed the generals for the mistakes and loss of life, and that people during the war did not really complain, so this shows that source C is at least telling part of the truth. Overall these sources are not really that useful for finding out the opinions of the old soldiers. A part of a soldier's diary would have been better or something else similar would have been a lot more useful. Jacob Parker 11 Turner ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    He says 'first the absence of the enemy' and asks the sergeant the second difference which the sergeant replies 'the absence of the major, sir'. This caption attempts to make the reader believe the generals do not know what happens on the battlefield as he is not present.

  2. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    It is very hard to tell whether this source is biased or not because we do not know where the producers of the show got their information or whether they were trying to provide a biased view. However the writers were well educated and it is very probable they did lots of research.

  1. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    We know this because it says "Mr. Greg pays doctor Holland for all the medicine and for coming out." Which may suggest why they had little sickness as they could be treated. The final limitation of the source is that the extract is only based upon styal mill, where as the question asks about all mills in

  2. Did the First World War liberate British women?

    writers, we are not given a reason for why they wrote it and who they were. Based on my own research about the suffragists and the suffragettes I would this source does describe what they do clearly so I would say that it is a reliable source.

  1. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    However the points used in the programme must hold some element of truth in order to be relevant to the episode. It says in 'The front line soldier and the Staff' - " to some soldiers the commander-in-cheif was so renound a figure hat they failed to recognise him even when they encountered him in person..."

  2. You have been commissioned to undertake research into attitudes toward the Good Friday Agreement ...

    This may be as a step towards peace as opposed to an affiliation with certain groups. (Table 3) When asked if they would vote on another referendum today (s3q33) the majority of those that would not vote are once again those of no religious denomination - 35% with those most

  1. How useful are sources A, B, and C to a historian studying the attitudes ...

    The extract is a quote by Earl Haig, the son of Field Marshal Haig, defending and justifying his father's actions in the First World War. Earl Haig is not a historian and will have been influenced by what his father has told him about his actions and will quite obviously have an extremely biased and one sighted opinion.

  2. Haig and the other British generals were incompetent leaders. How valid is this interpretation ...

    For both Haig and his armies, the battles of 1916/17 were a painful and bloody learning process but it proclaimed Haig?s perserverance towards the war. In April 1915, the Germans used a new weapon gas. It had a terrible effect on the soliders as it ate away their lungs and attacked their eyes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work