• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use sources A to C and knowledge from your studies to answer. The wartime Generals have been greatly criticized for the mistakes made during the First World War. People blamed the generals because they made decisions that got millions of people killed while they sat in bunkers a safe distance away from the fighting. This issue was so controversial that films were made about it and also a very famous book called "Lions led by Donkeys". Assessing these sources, I will find out how reliable they are and what the soldiers thought of their generals at the time. ...read more.


This source only tells us that the general public at the time either thought that or were under the impression that the generals were not very good. Source C, a statement by Earl Haig, the son of Douglas Haig, although to some extent he is trying to protect his father he puts across some valid points. He says that the soldiers during the war never criticized the generals, it was only the people after the war that started to criticize them. He also said that serious historians were coming to the view that the war had to be thought to the end, people like Dr Gary Sheffield who wrote the book "Lions Led by Donkeys?" was one of the historians that that agreed with this. ...read more.


At the end of the day this program was designed to make money and make people laugh otherwise it would not have been a success, they would have changed things and used the opinion of the public to get the laughs they needed. Although none of these sources are really that reliable source, C is probably the most reliable. I already know from my studies that people after the war blamed the generals for the mistakes and loss of life, and that people during the war did not really complain, so this shows that source C is at least telling part of the truth. Overall these sources are not really that useful for finding out the opinions of the old soldiers. A part of a soldier's diary would have been better or something else similar would have been a lot more useful. Jacob Parker 11 Turner ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Were Lions led by donkeys in World war one?

    Firstly, it was written in 1993, 79 years after the war in 1916. So it may not be as reliable as a source written at the time, because the writer has not experienced the war first hand, so he could not have witnessed the events that he was writing about.

  2. Is the statement "Lions led by Donkeys" accurate? To answer this question, I will ...

    This may be a counter-argument for the fact that many lives were lost for too small a gain and the tactics used, which were useless. The Generals were accused of living miles away from the Front line and living cushy life-styles.

  1. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    Male politicians of the time, were set against Suffragettes arguing that the whole numbers of voters would be swamped because the majority of them. One politician in particular, Herbert Asquith, (source B4) stated his refusal to accept the women's vote, saying that he would not agree to women's suffrage until

  2. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    German defenders were on high ground with a good view, their defences were there since the beginning of the war so there dugouts were strong and the barbed wire was more than 30 metres wide making it impossible to penetrate.

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    Source C is biased not because it was written by Haig's son (however I'm sure that is part of the reason for his view) but because it does not refer to any hard evidence for the reasons it puts forward, it is an opinion rather than a view.

  2. 'The British offensive on the Sommewas doomed to be a disaster from the start ...

    To wear down the strength of the forces opposed to us, this was achieved as shown by Source E which is an extract from a German General called Ludendorffs memoirs, this says that as a result of the battle of the Somme the German army had been completely exhausted and that if the war lasted defeat would be inevitable.

  1. How useful are the sources A, B and C in understanding what the battle ...

    The quote made by A.J.P Taylor is a contradiction. The French were expecting to be attacked through the Maginot Line, but instead Germany attacked through Belgium. The British Expeditionary Force (BEF) had been sent across to France but found it a struggle to work together with the French and Belgian troops.

  2. How useful are Sources A, B and C to an Historianstudying the attitudes of ...

    But it like source A puts across a obvious point, in this case that sending so many soldiers to their deaths was not helping them win the war. Although, at the time the soldier did not know their deaths were coming, so Hindsight is used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work