• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use sources A to C and knowledge from your studies to answer. The wartime Generals have been greatly criticized for the mistakes made during the First World War. People blamed the generals because they made decisions that got millions of people killed while they sat in bunkers a safe distance away from the fighting. This issue was so controversial that films were made about it and also a very famous book called "Lions led by Donkeys". Assessing these sources, I will find out how reliable they are and what the soldiers thought of their generals at the time. ...read more.

Middle

This source only tells us that the general public at the time either thought that or were under the impression that the generals were not very good. Source C, a statement by Earl Haig, the son of Douglas Haig, although to some extent he is trying to protect his father he puts across some valid points. He says that the soldiers during the war never criticized the generals, it was only the people after the war that started to criticize them. He also said that serious historians were coming to the view that the war had to be thought to the end, people like Dr Gary Sheffield who wrote the book "Lions Led by Donkeys?" was one of the historians that that agreed with this. ...read more.

Conclusion

At the end of the day this program was designed to make money and make people laugh otherwise it would not have been a success, they would have changed things and used the opinion of the public to get the laughs they needed. Although none of these sources are really that reliable source, C is probably the most reliable. I already know from my studies that people after the war blamed the generals for the mistakes and loss of life, and that people during the war did not really complain, so this shows that source C is at least telling part of the truth. Overall these sources are not really that useful for finding out the opinions of the old soldiers. A part of a soldier's diary would have been better or something else similar would have been a lot more useful. Jacob Parker 11 Turner ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Is the statement "Lions led by Donkeys" accurate? To answer this question, I will ...

    Looking at evidence from back when the war was in its gruelling stages, letters home from the soldiers revealed no distaste for Field Marshal Haig, in fact, they had great faith in his plans.

  2. Were Lions led by donkeys in World war one?

    The source implies that Haig was a good General, and that he won the war, which was what he was asked to do, and that the loss of lives was unavoidable. However, this source may not be very reliable, because of a number of reasons.

  1. 'Lions Led by Donkeys'. Using the information in the sources and your own knowledge, ...

    It supports the interpretation as it describes how many soldiers had to deal with difficult conditions and unrealistic tasks made by the generals which were not practiced before hand.

  2. 'The British offensive on the Sommewas doomed to be a disaster from the start ...

    That there is a great deal of bias here and that this Source is not reliable because it only shows one side of the story. But at the same time he does have the help of hindsight and there is some truth in his criticisms like when he criticises the foolishness the British generals (in particular Hiag)

  1. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    The source is based around Earl Haigs opinions on his father and him trying to justify his fathers actions and persuade people that his father was not harsh and uncaring. The first thing to notice about the source is that the author of the source is Earl Haig who is

  2. How useful are sources A,B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of ...

    The source is telling me that the Generals were pretty useless and made a lot of innocent people lose their lives. It also tells me that soldiers really did dislike their Generals because they put a lot of soldiers and innocent people in life risking situations.

  1. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    It is very hard to tell whether this source is biased or not because we do not know where the producers of the show got their information or whether they were trying to provide a biased view. However the writers were well educated and it is very probable they did lots of research.

  2. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    general and we know styal was not a typical mill because it was a small, early countryside mill which was not very popular at the time. Source B is part of a statement made my Thomas Priestly in 1806. Tom ran away from Greg's mill on 22nd of June but

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work