• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War?

Extracts from this document...


How useful are sources A, B and C to a historian studying the attitudes of British Soldiers to their commanders during the First World War? Use sources A to C and knowledge from your studies to answer. The wartime Generals have been greatly criticized for the mistakes made during the First World War. People blamed the generals because they made decisions that got millions of people killed while they sat in bunkers a safe distance away from the fighting. This issue was so controversial that films were made about it and also a very famous book called "Lions led by Donkeys". Assessing these sources, I will find out how reliable they are and what the soldiers thought of their generals at the time. ...read more.


This source only tells us that the general public at the time either thought that or were under the impression that the generals were not very good. Source C, a statement by Earl Haig, the son of Douglas Haig, although to some extent he is trying to protect his father he puts across some valid points. He says that the soldiers during the war never criticized the generals, it was only the people after the war that started to criticize them. He also said that serious historians were coming to the view that the war had to be thought to the end, people like Dr Gary Sheffield who wrote the book "Lions Led by Donkeys?" was one of the historians that that agreed with this. ...read more.


At the end of the day this program was designed to make money and make people laugh otherwise it would not have been a success, they would have changed things and used the opinion of the public to get the laughs they needed. Although none of these sources are really that reliable source, C is probably the most reliable. I already know from my studies that people after the war blamed the generals for the mistakes and loss of life, and that people during the war did not really complain, so this shows that source C is at least telling part of the truth. Overall these sources are not really that useful for finding out the opinions of the old soldiers. A part of a soldier's diary would have been better or something else similar would have been a lot more useful. Jacob Parker 11 Turner ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Is the statement "Lions led by Donkeys" accurate? To answer this question, I will ...

    Looking at evidence from back when the war was in its gruelling stages, letters home from the soldiers revealed no distaste for Field Marshal Haig, in fact, they had great faith in his plans.

  2. How useful are sources A, B and C to an historian studying the attitudes ...

    However it does have some use to a historian because the author talks about how some of the older soldiers never said a bad word about Haig. On the other hand I believe this should be treated with scepticism due to the bias of the excerpt in the first paragraph.

  1. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    general and we know styal was not a typical mill because it was a small, early countryside mill which was not very popular at the time. Source B is part of a statement made my Thomas Priestly in 1806. Tom ran away from Greg's mill on 22nd of June but

  2. Did the First World War liberate British women?

    Many thought that what she had done was stupid but the suffragettes called her a "martyr" and held a public funeral for her in London. Source B6 would not be reliable in the sense that because it had been written by "The Times" news paper.

  1. Sources A,B and C portray a particular view of the attitudes of British Soldiers ...

    However the points used in the programme must hold some element of truth in order to be relevant to the episode. It says in 'The front line soldier and the Staff' - " to some soldiers the commander-in-cheif was so renound a figure hat they failed to recognise him even when they encountered him in person..."

  2. You have been commissioned to undertake research into attitudes toward the Good Friday Agreement ...

    likely voting yes Catholics - 84.2% and those most likely voting no being Protestants - 42.7% and it can be assumed that the same pattern is being followed. In order to test the results of the analysis carried out an independent samples test was conducted (Table 3a).

  1. How useful are sources A, B, and C to a historian studying the attitudes ...

    He says, "When the old soldiers who fought in the war were alive, I never heard a word of criticism from them." He is blatantly not going to meet with a man who is going to insult his father's actions, and if he did he would not be likely to tell a national newspaper about it.

  2. How useful are sources A,B and C to an historian studying the attitudes of ...

    The soldiers feel that the General is never there. Source B: This source is useful in studying the attitudes of soldiers towards their commanders. This source tells me that the soldiers do not have any respect towards their commanders. This source was written after the war in a series called "Blackadder goes forth" on BBC TV.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work