• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Source A and Source B - How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study Source A and Source B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? (7 marks) In both sources they discuss why prohibition was introduced and the effects of it. They were both written during the 1970's and were both used as American History Books so some of the ideas are similar. In these sources they show that the organizations trying to campaign for prohibition and that they created a very strong image on the public, they had succeeded in what they set out to do and eventually gained so much public support that the constitution passed the rule to ban alcohol. The reasons of prohibition are debatable but the results of it were unquestionable, the fact is that its outcome was it created the greatest criminal boom ever and this is illustrated in both sources. There are a lot of different views on the reason that was mainly responsible why prohibition was introduced. The views include things like alcohol is addictive and a person act improperly when drunk therefore people could have thought that an alcoholic drink contained evil spirits which made a person be wrongdoing after a few drinks. ...read more.

Middle

In source B a nationwide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League, brought pressure to bear on congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing. This reminds us of the points brought up by Source A that the Anti-Saloon League played a major part in the propaganda for prohibition towards the public which was very successful and gained a lot of support to try and put an immense amount of pressure on congress and causing them to ban alcohol in general for America. In 1917 they succeeded partly by getting congress to out rule the fuse of grain for either distilling or brewing. This was a great blow to the brewing industry. Some other explanations that were mentioned in Source A on why the ban of alcohol was introduced included the bad influence of saloons, the wartime concern for preserving grain for food, feelings against the German-Americans who where important in brewing and distilling, and the influence of the Anti-Saloon League at a time when large numbers of men were absent in the armed forces. ...read more.

Conclusion

of this attempt to stamp out the use of alcohol was that by 1928 there were more than 30, 000 "speakeasies" in New York alone. This shows that the amount of alcohol that was being used was still out of hand when prohibition had been introduced for about eight years. There are a lot of different points of view on this but the general idea of how prohibition started was similar in both sources. The idea of organizations, Women's Christian Temperance Union and the Anti-saloon League being the two main ones who influenced the public to see the evils of alcohol and who put a lot of pressure on Congress. The image of the outcome of Prohibition was similar in both sources. The sources showed that the use of alcohol was seen as a threat to democracy and should be banned. They both say that after prohibition was introduced, there was a large criminal boom ever in history consequently of prohibition. This law had not worked because the law had gone against the daily customs, desires and habits of so many citizens of America. Keith Huang History Coursework - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. American History Coursework

    It prevented many super-corporations from exploiting their workers' desperation for capital, and ensured that the requirements of the workers could no longer be neglected. Due to the fact that a mammoth increase in the profits of companies was not reflected in the wages of workers during the boom period, many workers would have felt fairly distressed.

  2. History - Prohibition

    Sources C and D are posters created in 1910 and 1915 respectively. They both show the effects of alcohol on family life. Source C portrays a man who is spending all his money on alcohol in a saloon. It also portrays this man's wife and child at home but with no food.

  1. Prohibition was doomed a failure from the start - agree or disagree

    Something as widespread as alcohol cannot be made illegal (which was never seen as a crime) overnight. The general alcohol consumers thought if they broke the law on a large enough scale it would bring repeal, this action ignited a chain reaction which brought about thousands of speakeasies.

  2. Roosevelt source related study.

    This was followed by the figures rising once again. Roosevelt then realised that he had to keep spending. This source also does not show other aspects of the New Deal. Both sources H and I agree that Roosevelt was bold enough and that he had improved America.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    Kramer, the first Prohibition Commissioner, spoke source F. -This immediately tells us that the source is more than likely to be an opinionated perspective. This is because John F.Kramer's job was to enforce and promote prohibition. He therefore would have not given any possible failures or disadvantages of Prohibition, causing this source to be unbalanced.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    Also the mother is crying which would also evoke emotions to the reader, especially men who do this as they would not like to see their wives crying. The money bag seems to be the size of the bottle showing that he is spending all that money when he could probably have bought many things with the same amount.

  1. Depth study USA.

    Industries were growing by electrifying or mechanising production. The same number of people were unemployed at the peak of the boom in 1929 as in 1920. These millions of unemployed Americans were not sharing the boom. The included many poor whites, but an even greater proportion of Black and Hispanic people and another member of the USA�s large inmigrant communities.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    Similarly someone who could see the amount of corruption that was happening and was therefore against prohibition as it was clearly failing could also have produced this cartoon. The artist probably wanted to show up these people who were supposed to be enforcing the law, and he must have wanted others to know exactly what was going on.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work