• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study Source A and Source B - How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Study Source A and Source B. How far do these two accounts agree about Prohibition? (7 marks) In both sources they discuss why prohibition was introduced and the effects of it. They were both written during the 1970's and were both used as American History Books so some of the ideas are similar. In these sources they show that the organizations trying to campaign for prohibition and that they created a very strong image on the public, they had succeeded in what they set out to do and eventually gained so much public support that the constitution passed the rule to ban alcohol. The reasons of prohibition are debatable but the results of it were unquestionable, the fact is that its outcome was it created the greatest criminal boom ever and this is illustrated in both sources. There are a lot of different views on the reason that was mainly responsible why prohibition was introduced. The views include things like alcohol is addictive and a person act improperly when drunk therefore people could have thought that an alcoholic drink contained evil spirits which made a person be wrongdoing after a few drinks. ...read more.

Middle

In source B a nationwide campaign, led by the Anti-Saloon League, brought pressure to bear on congress to ban the use of grain for either distilling or brewing. This reminds us of the points brought up by Source A that the Anti-Saloon League played a major part in the propaganda for prohibition towards the public which was very successful and gained a lot of support to try and put an immense amount of pressure on congress and causing them to ban alcohol in general for America. In 1917 they succeeded partly by getting congress to out rule the fuse of grain for either distilling or brewing. This was a great blow to the brewing industry. Some other explanations that were mentioned in Source A on why the ban of alcohol was introduced included the bad influence of saloons, the wartime concern for preserving grain for food, feelings against the German-Americans who where important in brewing and distilling, and the influence of the Anti-Saloon League at a time when large numbers of men were absent in the armed forces. ...read more.

Conclusion

of this attempt to stamp out the use of alcohol was that by 1928 there were more than 30, 000 "speakeasies" in New York alone. This shows that the amount of alcohol that was being used was still out of hand when prohibition had been introduced for about eight years. There are a lot of different points of view on this but the general idea of how prohibition started was similar in both sources. The idea of organizations, Women's Christian Temperance Union and the Anti-saloon League being the two main ones who influenced the public to see the evils of alcohol and who put a lot of pressure on Congress. The image of the outcome of Prohibition was similar in both sources. The sources showed that the use of alcohol was seen as a threat to democracy and should be banned. They both say that after prohibition was introduced, there was a large criminal boom ever in history consequently of prohibition. This law had not worked because the law had gone against the daily customs, desires and habits of so many citizens of America. Keith Huang History Coursework - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    This shows the evils of the father and the salon taking the money to give them new clothes and good. Also the statement below shows that the children know what is going on and they know the consequences of the father's actions.

  2. American History Coursework

    This administration removed this distress which they had previously been forced to experience. In addition to this, the NRA ameliorated the position of labour unions - they became influential enough to confront the gargantuan super corporations, challenging them for more acceptable working conditions, and negotiating for elevated wages.

  1. Prohibition. Source A believes that it was "the influence of the Anti-saloon league" and ...

    Other evidence includes the rise of gangsters and organised crime. A the consumption of alcohol was still taking place; it needed to be in hiding from places like Anti-saloon league and therefore all over America crime showed the biggest increase in American history.

  2. GCSE History Coursework

    Being a policeman he was reluctant to take the bribe and wanted to enforce the law of prohibition: 'if u tried to enforce the law they'd put you in a post where there was nothing but weeds'- this is trying to say a job in back water.

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    increase in people drinking or alcohol being manufactured, as the Volstead Act banned this. (e) Study Sources I and J How far does Source I prove that the policeman in source J is telling the truth? Source I is a cartoon titled 'The National Gesture'.

  2. Source A and Source B struggle to agree on the causes of prohibition. I ...

    There is a smaller picture in the bottom right hand corner showing a woman crying and a child holding his empty food bowl up as if asking where his food was. Above this scene it is said that the saloon keeps its members and their families always poor.

  1. Prohibition. Source A is from an American history book it was published in ...

    will not take proper care of them and will use money which should be used to buy essential things for children, that money will be spent on alcohol. c) Source E is a letter which was written by John D Rockefeller, a wealthy industrialist.

  2. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    about prohibition, it is primary evidence, and John D Rockefeller junior had nothing to gain or lose from prohibition and he would therefore be unbiased.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work