• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study source A. Does it prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his man?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Study source A. Does it prove that Haig did not care about the lives of his man? Source A is an article published in national newspaper by Haig month before the offensive had started (June 1916). This source paints Haig as very cold hearted man. From his writing we can get an impression that he does not care about life of his soldiers, as he says that nation "must be taught to bear losses". This quote as well as the whole writing suggests that death was really natural to him and life had no real value. Form Source B it is quite hard to see if Haig cared about life of his man or not. Both paragraphs in source B are written by Haig, and are his diary entries. The first paragraph is an extract written a day before the attack (30th June 1916).In this diary entry Haig seems really optimistic and ready. ...read more.

Middle

Haig says there that the attack was very successful and that it went "like clockwork" which means that it had went according to plan. We know that this is not true as 200,000 men were lost during the first morning of the attack. Here is also hard to say if he cares about the life of his man. He says that his troops are "in wonderful spirits and full of confidence" which means that he must care about them as he knows this sort of stuff. Than here is a fact that he did not go to see them himself, which could also mean that he was not interested enough to go to trenches and see how his man are doing. We know that he did not check this himself as if he did he would not write such a nonsense. He would write about the loss of lives and barely any land gained. ...read more.

Conclusion

This could explain Haig's mistake of carrying on with the war to some people but other will say like John Lathin that Haig had never "dirtied his boots" which means that the general never actually went to the trenches to check the situation personally. I think that Haig took his job very seriously but had little experience it that kind of war. He might come across as cold hearted person but I think that he had to teach himself to be this way as all the lives of his man are under his control and this is a huge responsibility. I think that if he had gone to the trenches himself he might had changed his plan, but at the same time, not being inside the trenches meant that he could take a look and control the entire trenches . I personally think that he was trying to do the best that he could, but it was hard without any experience in that kind of "new" war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Votes For Women - Source related study.

    The source states actual numbers instead of descriptive amounts. This makes it more plausible. The headings in the table are "metal industries", "chemical industries", "government offices", and "food, drink and tobacco." These are quite broad definitions, making the data quite crude because it does not actually say what the women did at all, just that they worked in those areas.

  2. Britain in the age of total War - source related study

    There is no proof that these people's houses had been bombed. For all we know, all this picture could be, is a photograph staged by the government, who has told these people to look happy. To add to this is the fact that some of these people are giving the cameraman the 'thumbs-up'.

  1. Study sources A and B. how far does source A prove that Haig does ...

    Also in source B Haig is saying that "the barbed wire has never been so well cut" yet is contradicted in source C by private George Coppard describing the Germans wire as "so thick that daylight could barely be seen through it."

  2. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    I also have doubts as to the truth behind the troops having "splendid spirits". This is because he would have had someone to answer to and you wouldn't go and tell them that everyone's heads are dropped and worried about the fact that they could be shot at any point.

  1. How Far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    It describes the part of the line that he was fighting on and gives a much more graphic account of what it was like to be involved on the Somme Offensive. It is describing mostly the carnage of the barbed wire and the soldiers who were trapped on it.

  2. How far does Source A prove that Haig did not care about the lives ...

    Rawlinson suggested that the British should concentrate its operations on the Western Front by launching a series of small discreet attacks. Inexperienced British troops would gain experience from these attacks while they could use the British industrial strength, which was now fully mobilised, to beat the Germans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work