• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study sources A and B. Which of the two sources

Extracts from this document...


Question A Study sources A and B. Which of the two sources would a historian studying kristallnacht find more useful Source A is a summary by a historian of Fritz Hesse's account of a dinner with Hitler. Hesse wrote his account in 1954. There are many concerns about source A. a major problem with source A is that Fritz Hesse did not write his account until 1954, which was 16 years after the event. Although it would have been an important event in Hesse's life, it would be highly unlikely that he could have remembered the event as vividly as it is wrote. This can make the information unreliable as Hesse could have forgotten information or wrongly remembered it, and also makes it secondary evidence. ...read more.


Source B is a secret report prepared by the Nazi Supreme Court after the events of kristallnacht. I believe that this source would be the most useful as I have less concerns about it. We do not know how reliable the source is, but it was a secret report, so why would they lie in a secret report that only specific people were intended to see. However, it was written by the Nazis, and they didn't want it to look like they had organised kristallnacht, so they might have wrote it inclined towards the innocence of the Nazis to clear their name of organising event. They might also do this as they would know that the secret report would be found at sometime, and that people would know about it. ...read more.


This means it was most likely to have been wrote before 1939, which makes source B more of a primary source. I feel that source B would be the most useful to a historian studying kristallnacht as it is more of a primary source. Despite this, source A is still useful as it has some similarities to source B. In source A it tells us that Goebbels tells Hitler of the attacks on the Jewish society. This could be because Goebbels wanted to look good in front of Hitler so he could get back in with him. This gives Goebbels a motive for organising kristallnacht. This is backed up by source B, where on the first line it tells us that Goebbels mentioned the attacks to Hitler again. I feel that as source B was a secret report that there would be more truth into it. 1 Connor Richardson 10WS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    Study sources C, D and E. Do sources D and E make it more, or less likely, that the account given in source C is accurate? I think that source D and E does support what is said in Source C because there are certain factors in each that agree with source C.

  2. Holocaust Sources Questions

    The German people were "Hitler's willing executioners". Using the sources and your own knowledge to what extent do you agree with this statement? Ans. The statement that the German people were Hitler's willing executioners is not exactly true, most of the German people had no knowledge of the extermination camps.

  1. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    This would hinder plans for war, which Hitler did not want. Couple this with the fact that Source A has proven to be reliable anyway, Source A makes Source H seem less reliable. Source I blames no-one specifically just "the people responsible".

  2. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    Ernst von Roth was an official for the German Embassy in Paris and the Jewish man shot him dead on the basis of revenge for the mistreatment of his parents by the Nazis. Buffman goes on to say that the local people were 'obviously horrified by the Nazis' acts'; he

  1. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    "such events must be allowed to take place" which obviously suggests that Hitler was in favour of Kristallnacht. Source 'I' is a conversation between Hitler and Frau Troost shortly after Kristallnacht. It is being reported by Frau Troost 33 years after the actual events.

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    was convinced everything the Nazis did was right and essential." A further display of how much she disbelieved the gossip is shown when it is learnt that "her whole world collapsed," after being shown round a concentration camp, which gives the impression that she really did not know(believe)

  1. Hitler Sources Question

    So Source B would be naturally more pro-NAZI than source A. Evidence of this is given in source B where Hitler and the NAZI flag are much brighter than the rest of the painting showing them to be in a higher power than the rest of the people in the picture.

  2. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    According to the evidence he discovers in which he states is "reliable" the violence was carried out my SS men and out of uniform Storm-troopers, he accuses the fire brigade of having been told to spray water only on joining buildings so only the Jewish shops burn.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work