• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Study sources A and B. Which of the two sources

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question A Study sources A and B. Which of the two sources would a historian studying kristallnacht find more useful Source A is a summary by a historian of Fritz Hesse's account of a dinner with Hitler. Hesse wrote his account in 1954. There are many concerns about source A. a major problem with source A is that Fritz Hesse did not write his account until 1954, which was 16 years after the event. Although it would have been an important event in Hesse's life, it would be highly unlikely that he could have remembered the event as vividly as it is wrote. This can make the information unreliable as Hesse could have forgotten information or wrongly remembered it, and also makes it secondary evidence. ...read more.

Middle

Source B is a secret report prepared by the Nazi Supreme Court after the events of kristallnacht. I believe that this source would be the most useful as I have less concerns about it. We do not know how reliable the source is, but it was a secret report, so why would they lie in a secret report that only specific people were intended to see. However, it was written by the Nazis, and they didn't want it to look like they had organised kristallnacht, so they might have wrote it inclined towards the innocence of the Nazis to clear their name of organising event. They might also do this as they would know that the secret report would be found at sometime, and that people would know about it. ...read more.

Conclusion

This means it was most likely to have been wrote before 1939, which makes source B more of a primary source. I feel that source B would be the most useful to a historian studying kristallnacht as it is more of a primary source. Despite this, source A is still useful as it has some similarities to source B. In source A it tells us that Goebbels tells Hitler of the attacks on the Jewish society. This could be because Goebbels wanted to look good in front of Hitler so he could get back in with him. This gives Goebbels a motive for organising kristallnacht. This is backed up by source B, where on the first line it tells us that Goebbels mentioned the attacks to Hitler again. I feel that as source B was a secret report that there would be more truth into it. 1 Connor Richardson 10WS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    Study sources C, D and E. Do sources D and E make it more, or less likely, that the account given in source C is accurate? I think that source D and E does support what is said in Source C because there are certain factors in each that agree with source C.

  2. Holocaust Sources Questions

    The German people were "Hitler's willing executioners". Using the sources and your own knowledge to what extent do you agree with this statement? Ans. The statement that the German people were Hitler's willing executioners is not exactly true, most of the German people had no knowledge of the extermination camps.

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    But Source D disagrees with them both, suggesting that it could have been a spontaneous attack because of the build up of anti-Jewish feeling before Kristallnacht. This at first would seem to make source C less reliable, although the fact that source C and E agree so much perhaps indicates that source D is not reliable at all.

  2. What was the main cause of Kristallnacht?

    had the event fresh in their minds to create a reliable cartoon. Source G portrays a similar image and is just as unreliable because of the room for bias. It does not say if it was spontaneous but what it does show is the German public were helpless and could not stop the government.

  1. Study all the sources.

    It then tells us that Hitler told Goebbles that such attacks were not to be organised, but if they were to spontaneously happen that they were not to be stopped. We do not know how reliable the source is, but as it was a secret report, so why would they

  2. Which of these two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find the more useful?

    According to the evidence he discovers in which he states is "reliable" the violence was carried out my SS men and out of uniform Storm-troopers, he accuses the fire brigade of having been told to spray water only on joining buildings so only the Jewish shops burn.

  1. Kristallnacht - Which of the two sources would an historian studying Kristallnacht find more ...

    I think that source A is more reliable because it isn't a piece of propaganda and source B was trying to trick the German people. But I think that a historian would find source B more reliable because it shows that the Nazis tried to cover up Kristallnacht.

  2. Kristallnacht - source related study.

    other hand it could be reliable because he uses negative Nazi images and he also he has taken an enormous risk in writing this note. Source 'E' attempts to convey shock of "Most German people", who are not he says involved in the "plunderings and destruction" of Jewish property.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work