• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The collapse of the Weimar republic.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

It was not clear that the republic was doomed from the start, but it was evident that the republic was doomed from 1930, when the country was splitting into two groups, left and right, who both wanted an end to the republic, and a change to another political system, communist or Nazi. Hiden states that, "No one factor was responsible for the collapse of the Weimar republic, but the combination of factors and circumstances that lead to it's down fall." I agree with this statement to some extent. By 1930 the government felt that time was ripe for a more authoritarian political system that would reduce democratic and social rights. The Centre Party politician Heinrich Bruning, one mastermind of this intrigue, hoped to restore a more authoritarian constitution limiting parliamentary rights and keeping the socialists and trade unions out of the state. In many ways this vision aimed to recreate the political system of the Wilhelmine Empire. The first argument advocating that Bruning was responsible for the collapse of the Republic is that after Hindenburg had appointed him as chancellor, he used presidential emergency decrees (under Article 48) if the government faced opposition in the Reichstag, according to H.Boldt the use of decree laws increased from 5 in 1930 to 60 in 1932. On account of this rule with decree, under Br´┐Żning's chancellorship, the government thus no longer functioned democratically, undermining the Republic. ...read more.

Middle

A contrasting argument advocating blame for the downfall of the Weimar republic to Kurt von Schleicher is that it was actually Schleicher that was according to A. White the "most influential figure in German Politics". Schleicher, after the fall of Muller's 'grand coalition', as argued by White "saw the collapse of the parliamentary government as an opportunity to reconstruct the German political system on a non-democratic basis". Schleicher was a military officer who wished for a return to the Bismarckian-style government, his aim was to put in place an "authoritarian political system" (White). When in March 1930, Bruning was appointed as Chancellor he was essentially Schleicher "nominee", predominately because of his authoritarian political leanings and, not least, his military record. However when Schleicher was frustrated by Bruning's inabilitity to solve unemployment and Hindenburg lost confidence in the Chancellor, Schleicher persuaded Hindenburg to appoint Franz Von Papen as the Chancellor. Schleicher saw 'little Franz' as a "political lightweight" who could be easily manipulated, and through Papen the Nazi's could be 'tamed'. Therefore the policies that Papen adopted to woo Hitler, was fundamentally Schleicher's, such as the revoking the ban imposed upon the S.A. It is apparent that Schleicher is control of German politics, because when Papen began to assert his political independence, he was quick to pressure Hindenburg into dismissing von Papen. Schleicher's short-lived spell as Chancellor between December 1932 and January 1933 was precarious from the outset and his resignation signalled the end of the Weimar Republic. ...read more.

Conclusion

Schleicher wanted to establish the "more overtly authoraritarian system" (White), and it was he who believed the Nazis could be 'tamed' within such a system. Threfore it was he who might be blamed for the the destruction of the Republic and the rise of the Nazis. One might view Von Papen as an innocent by-stander in the collapse of the Republic, however it is he that "came forward with plans to make himself Germany's dictator" (White) to Hindenburg, and after he had been dismissed he began to plot with Adolf Hitler in an effort to oust Schleicher who was now chancellor of Germany. The rise of National Socialism is another main factor, with Hitler's skill and the Nazi ideology gaining support, at a time when the world economic crisis struck the already weak and unstable Weimar Republic, as stated by Layton, as it [National Socialism] flourished, so the Republic's chances of survival diminished". Also it can be argued that from the start, the Qwemar Republic was faced by the hostility of the Germany's established elites and Weimar democracy never enjoyed widespread support, according to Layton, "On the eve of the world economic crisis it seem that Weimar's long-term chances of survival were already far from good". In my opinion all of these factors contributed to the collapse of the Weimar Republic, Bruning's, Von Papen's and Schleicher gravitation towards an increasingly authorititarian government, ended any chance of the Republic's survival, and played into Hitler's 'skilful' hands, who was helped by a economic crisis spiralling out of control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. 'The Weimar Republic was weak from the start, its collapse was always 'likely'' - ...

    Monarchists seized government buildings in Berlin, but surrendered on March 17th. The Weimar government had had another close escape. The early major activities of Hitler included his 'Beer Hall Putch' in 1923, where he tried to seize control of The Bavarian government.

  2. What factors best describe the collapse of Weimar and the rise of Hitler?

    Therefore the events which occurred as the Republic was created can be seen as factors which would lead to its downfall. Weimar's next problem was its system of government. Again a series of events led to the collapse of parliamentary democracy in Germany.

  1. Was the collapse of the Weimar Republic inevitable?

    During this time, the "Grand Coalition" of the DVP, DDP and Catholic Centre Party was in power in Germany. The Wall Street Crash caused the collapse of the Coalition over the issue of taxation and public spending. Once the Grand Coalition had collapsed in 1930, Hindenburg used Article 48 of the constitution to rule by presidential decree.

  2. Weimar Republic

    attempt to take control of Germany in 1919. The Left party was also known as the Sparticist Revolt. It was led by 'Karl Liebknecht' and 'Rosa Luxemburg'. They believed in 'Democracy'. They argued powerfully in order for Germany to become democratic. The Sparticists decided to gain power by forming rebel soldiers and sailors together.

  1. Why did the Nazis replace the Weimar Republic?

    The Nazis suddenly established significant popular support. 2. Political consequences caused by the Great Depression 1929 - Herman Muller's government was in power. The government was divided and was unable to deal with the crisis. March 1930 - the Government collapsed.

  2. Free essay

    Why did the Weimar Republic collapse in 1933?

    survived not because everyone wanted it but because it was the least objectionable alternative. It was described as ''a republic without republicans''. In November 1923 there was the Munich Putsch. Gustave Stresemann, the chancellor of Germany 1923 - 1924. It ended in refusal to pay reparations in an attempt to

  1. Why did the Weimar Republic collapse

    The weakness of the economy was great; this meant that the Weimar Republic could no longer maintain social stability. This fact was clear due to the fact that parties were restless always attempting a 'Putsch', which means takeover. For instance, in Weimar's early years many parties tried but failed to overthrow them.

  2. WWII History Revision Notes. How far did the Weimar Republic Recover between 1924-1928.

    They tapped telephone lines and spied on those who disliked Nazi regime The Police, Prisons and Courts 1. The SS had full control over the Police[p] 2.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work