• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This was the general formula of Bismarck's foreign policies meaning "When there are five great powers be one of three." The five great powers at that time were France

Extracts from this document...


Bismarck' foreign Policy "Versuche zu dreien zu sein, solange die Welt durch das unsichere Gleichgewicht von f�nf Gro�m�chten bestimmt wird!" This was the general formula of Bismarck's foreign policies meaning "When there are five great powers be one of three." The five great powers at that time were France, England, Russia, Austria-Hungary and the new united Germany. In foreign affairs, above all he wanted to keep peace in Europe, refusing further expansation, so that the strength of the German Empire would not be threatened. To begin with I would like to represent the 5 great powers in order to point out which of them would be a possible ally. * He couldn't ally himself with France due to the Franco-Prussian war. We could argue that the Franco-Prussian war was not a good way of ensuring a peacefull future in europe, but the war was welcomed and even forced by Bismarck. He firstly annoyed France by proposing that Prince Leopold von Hohenzollen should become king of Spain ,(which would lead to France being surrounded by hostile states) and secondly, the Ems telegram, being the final "reason" for France to declare war on Germany. The results of this war were all in favour of Bismarck, the treaty of Frankfurt was singed. France had to pay a compensation of five billion francs and lost the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine. ...read more.


Explaining his decisions to Keiser William 1 he said "For Russia no-one knows what eruptions of revolutionary elements may suddenly happen in the interior of the great empire." In fact looking at what happened further in Russia this statement is a prove of his diplomatically and politically skills. However Russia who felled disadvantaged moved large numbers of troops to the German borders. As a result, instead of getting scared Bismarck reacted to this by putting Russia under pressure by making a dual alliance with Austria-Hungary containing, that in case of a Russian attack they would support one another. As consequence Russia now feared isolation in Europe and proposed to renew the Dreikeiserbund. Regarding to this Bismarck had again succeeded to maintain peace and above that had equally successful accomplished to turn his own disadvantage to his benefit, indicating again his talents as a diplomatic jangler. Although the renewed Alliance only stated that in case of a forth power attacking them they would remain neutral. Moving further, Italy was upset of France's taking over Tunis, not at last, but unknown to Italy forced on by Bismarck. The transformation of the dual into a triple alliance between Italy, Germany and Austria-Hungary would allow Italy to follow it's colonial ambitions in safety. Despite Italy's liberal constitution, it's rather radical government and the differences in religious believes, Bismarck signed the treaty achieving a further isolation of France and looking for advantages due to its strategic importance. ...read more.


But British parliament refuses. He has no choice, but to try to renew the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia, but without success because, William II comes to the German throne who is opposed to it. This means trouble for Bismarck, he had nearly complete control over William I, but that was not going to work with William II. In June 1890 Bismarck gets dismissed. With reference to all the different treaties and Alliances Bismarck had set up throughout 26 years we must come to the conclusion that he was a diplomatical genius. He managed the impossible and avoided that work broke out between the 2 great powers of Austria-Hungary and Russia, without having particular benefit from it. Not to forget he renounced to participate in colonial policy in order to avoid war caused by colonial rivalry. But on the other Hand I think that a foreign policy based strongly on the isolation of one single country was not a policy able to last. In order to achieve long lasting peace he should have tried to sign treaties with France concerning Alsace and Lorraine, and find a solution to calm the constant will of revenge of France. In addition in my opinion he should have treated Russia more carefully in order to prevent anykind of hostility. In conclusion for me you can't have a successful foreign policy whilst your two main aims (maintaining peace and the isolation of France) contradict each other. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Long Fuse by Laurence Lafore - Chapter Three: The Europe of the Armed ...

    Because of this, they decided to arrange a crisis in which the hatred between Britain and France would be publicly displayed as would the solidarity between Germany and Italy. Morocco German Chancellor von Bulow was being asked by the Sultan of Morocco for German assistance in resisting the French in Morocco.

  2. "Tension between the countries of Europe increased in year before 1914 due to the ...

    Countries such as France and Britain were particularly at the heart of tension because Germany would be competing for land. Furthermore Britain had to have the largest navy as security to the country. The Navy laws of 1898 and 1900 meant that conflict would soon arise.

  1. Why did Great Britain move away from Splendid Isolation?

    Germany began to threaten Britain's naval supremacy following Admiral von Tirpitz's navy bill of 1898 which lead to threats in sea lanes approaching Britain's ports. Russia too showed growing naval strength after 1898 and the challenge that she represented to India through Asia meant that the British Navy was required both at home and abroad.

  2. How successful was Bismarckas Chancellor in his foreign policies between 1871-1890?

    right of the sword" (von Treitschke, a German nationalist referring to Alsace). Moreover, the war showed a new hierarchy of powers in Europe, where Germany was above France, which was the dominant power until then. As D Richards says in the book "An Illustrated History of Europe" (London, 1985), Bismarck thought "Firstly...

  1. "Castlereagh's foreign policy 1815-1822 was more successful than Canning's foreign policy 1822-1827" - Explain ...

    These principles were in his May 1820 state paper. At the time his objectives in foreign policy were to check French expansion, check Russian expansion and support Turkey, to protect British trading interests, prevent a combination of France and Russia (Britain could 'handle'

  2. German Foreign Policy - To what extent was the German Foreign Policy responsible ...

    Foreign competition was a major concern for politicians and businessmen, and there were calls for replacing free trade with protective tariffs. Britain had several colonial threats at that time which may have added to the conclusion of the splendid isolation policy.

  1. There was no general war (i.e. one involving all the great powers at the ...

    To do this, the treaty signed in Vienna did not only deal with France. Disputed territories such as Poland, and areas of Italy and Austria and the German states were also dealt with, ending long standing and possibly dangerous quarrels, mostly to the satisfaction of those involved.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    His principal object was to preserve a peaceful situation for the building up of the German Empire. His foreign policy was also adopted towards this direction. Yet his aim of internal stability and solidarity not only led to the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work