• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent were military weaknesses responsible for Britain's adoption of the policy of Appeasement to Nazi Germany in the 1930s?

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent were military weaknesses responsible for Britain's adoption of the policy of Appeasement to Nazi Germany in the 1930s? From 1935 onwards, the position of Nazi Germany in Europe was transformed. Hitler broke treaty after treaty, and yet Britain either stood aside (as in March 1936 over the Rhineland), from July 1936 during the Spanish Civil war, or in March 1938 over Anschluss) or actually intervened (as at Munich in September 1938) to enable Hitler to achieve his aims. As P Bell comments, "There were many wide ranging and sound reasons for pursuing appeasement, yet the policy failed and critics still argue that it was both disastrous and dishonourable"1. Some historians do suggest controversially that she was already passively doing so in the 1920s, and so it may follow those domestic, imperial and economic problems from the 1920s which continued into the 1930s were at least in part responsible for allowing Germany a 'free hand', especially in the light of the failure of the League of Nations and growing tension in Europe. ...read more.


In addition, Britain's own economy made it difficult for her to rearm, even if she felt that she would end a policy of appeasement. Most of her post-war economic problems had begun to recover until 1929 and then depression set in during the 1930s. Ellen makes the point that "The appeasement of Germany was not devised in the heat of the moment... Both the defence ration and appeasement were part of the government's carefully calculated assessment of the economic, social, political and strategic realities that Britain faced."3 The ministers were already aware that the increase in armaments spending was affecting the delicate budgetary balance. In 1935, defence had taken 15% of central government expenditures - �137 million out of a total of �841 million; in 1937, this had risen to 26% and jumped a further twelve percent in 1938.4 Taxes alone were unable to cover expenditure and in 1937 the Treasury had reluctantly agreed to a National Defence Loan. Near the end of 1937 was a commercial down-swing, where unemployment figures rose, prices rose and the sterling weakened against the dollar, the international markets volatile and at best, gloomy. ...read more.


It lead to a deliberate decision to ignore Germany's secret rearmament, to pressure exerted by Lord Balfour, foreign minister, on France explaining that Germany this time would go East and therefore her rearmament did not constitute a threat to France, the signature of the pact of Locarno which, while giving the most stringent guaranties to the countries west of Germany, gave no guaranties at all to the countries east of Germany. Thus it can be seen that it is perhaps the economic restraints coupled with the public opinion, the incapacity of a nation to prepare for war combined with its adversity to war which created and upheld this British policy of appeasement towards Nazi Germany. However, if it was economics and public opinion that determined this policy, then the other factors mentioned were surely supportive of a policy of appeasement. (994 words) 1 Philip M H Bell, - 'New Perspective' volume 5. 1. Sep 1999, Philip M H Bell 2 Chiefs of Staff, - The Politics of Appeasement, Paul Kennedy 3 J M Ellen - Origins of The Second World War, James Ellen and Mark Fisher 4 Figures from public records office. www.pro.gov.uk 5 The Realities Behind Diplomacy, Paul Kennedy 6 Hitler-Chamberlain , - Clement Leibovitz Aymen Mahmoud JA4 History/FW ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Germany 1920's and 1930's - Look at the weaknesses of the government and the ...

    Hitler was appointed giving the Nazis control. The weaknesses of the Republic and the strength of the Nazis led to Hitler to becoming Chancellor. He was a ruthless leader and the party became far more organized learning that it could only gain control through democratic means.

  2. During the 1920's and early 1930's Germany was trying to recover from World War. ...

    It is hardly surprising to read Goebbels reflection at Christmas of 'this year has brought us everlasting bad luck.' However, it would seem that the tide was turning. The new Chancellor, Schleicher, had failed to gain the mass support which he had promised Hindenburg, with his policy based on backing from the trade unions and the 'moderate' Nazis under Strasser.

  1. To What Extent Was Haig Responsible For The Failure At the Battle Of The ...

    Having to walk meant that the soldiers were much easier targets for the German Snipers and machine guns to hit which resulted in the high death toll on the first day. Also Haig was often sceptical of new military ideas, as he was as former cavalry soldier, who had been trained and had fought successful using horses.

  2. Was Appeasement A Mistake?

    time war broke out, Britain was still not ready, therefore Czechoslovakia was sacrificed unnecessarilly. He said that Chamberlin was in fact fooled by Hitler into waiting for more time to rearm and unite Britain. When Stalin saw that Britain had not stood up to Hitler when he invaded Czechoslovakia, he

  1. Was appeasement Justified? What was "appeasement"?

    The blame lay again at the feet of Neville Chamberlain however he was not totally blamed, the de-classification of documents such as the cabinet and imperial forces records, enforced the argument that although appeasement was the wrong policy and they misread Hitler's objectives and strategies.

  2. To What Extent was British Appeasement to Germany in the Interwar Period Justified?

    "When he became Prime Minister in May 1937 Neville Chamberlain...was prepared to take the initiative. Policy changed from passive to active appeasement."6 Financial constraints on rearmament convinced Chamberlain that, "conciliation...was to be preferred to confrontation."7 Winston Churchill, Chamberlain's political opponent, was an anti-appeaser.

  1. To what extent can it be argued that appeasement was the cause of the ...

    Churchill was also a clear critic of the policy of appeasement stating that " We cannot look back with much pleasure on our foreign policy.... the violation of the Rhineland is serious because of the menace to which it exposes Holland Belgium and France."

  2. Why did Britain and France pursue a policy of appeasement? Was it successful?

    this showed Hitler that there was no working mechanism for other countries to stand against him. The remilitarisation also took place on a Saturday which meant limited resistance. He had seen that France and Britain were making little effort to support Abyssinia and had done little to stop the Japanese at Manchuria.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work