What problems faced the new Republic in Germany from 1919 to 1923? Why did it survive?

Authors Avatar

What problems faced the new Republic in Germany from 1919 to 1923?

Why did it survive?

                In January 1919 revolution was suppressed as a communist rising by the spartactists was prevented. By February there was a formal establishment of the new regime and the Weimar constitution was drawn up. Germany became a Republic and Ebert became the head of the newly proclaimed government. Ebert chose the moderate course as he believed that most of the German people were for moderate change. On the surface Germany’s democracy looked strong, but underneath its roots were weak. Weimar was built on a feeble democratic tradition and from the outset many Germans were against it.

                To begin with, Ebert believed that the new regime needed the support of elite and was prepared to cooperate with them. So the traditional right wing elite remained intact and the left remained divided and weak. The elite held land and wanted an Empire, Elite were terrified of a real socialist revolution and were prepared, for the moment, to help the new government; the fact that the elite had initial support for the new regime was purely tactical and was threatening for the prospects of a secure democracy. The elite were aggressive and would only be content with radical reforms passed that benefited the working class to reduce communist rising, they wanted no change, more power and as  the left wing were weak they had an easy advantage. The conservative elite still dominated the new German Republic by holding most of the key positions as army officers and generals. The conservative leaders only strategically supported the regime and the freikorps demobilised the soldiers and were armed so there was a big threat from Germans who were hostile to the regime.

                In 1919 a democratic state was created in Germany after a series of complex revolutions but it could not be considered as a real revolution. This was due to Ebert’s unintentional exaggeration of the danger of a communist style revolution, his over-reliance on the old elite and underestimation of the threat presented to the new democracy meant a limited revolution.  Not having a real revolution limited Germanys chance of having a successful new democracy as old powers that led Germany to its problems were still in control, this was a great weakness. The revolution from below was caused by the KPD who wanted a communist revolution, they were the political opposition of the left which Ebert. On the right were the elite who led the revolution from above. It was true that Germany did need a revolution as there was a severe weakness in the existing government and mass discontent, however the revolution from below only pleased some people e.g. workers and industrialists were the revolution form above only pleased the rich business men. So none of the revolutions had a lot of support and having this separation divided Germany even more.

Join now!

                Ebert’s moderate line aroused left wing opposition and there was a big backlash from the spartactists that tried to take over in the hope of a communist revolution. Ebert correctly judged the mood of the majority of the German people and was justified in using the army to maintain the new government. Ebert’s short term measures had immediate and long term effects. Firstly, his deal with Greoner and the army ment that the government had support against the left, however this ment that the elite were in a strong position to undermine democracy later. Secondly Ebert’s deal with industrialists (the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay