• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

william the conqueror

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What factors contributed to the successful invasion of England by William the Conqueror? William's tenuous blood claim coupled with the promise of the previous monarch Edward the Confessor, a pledge of allegiance by Harold Godwinson and the other claim to the throne by Viking king Harald Hardrada were the most important factors in the successful invasion. Upon the death of Edward the Confessor the throne was disputed by three Claimants- William; Harold Godwinson, the powerful Earl of Wessex; and the Viking King Harald Hardrada of Norway. Williams claim came from his great Aunt who was the Mother of Edward and also from the alleged promise of the throne by Edward whilst he was in exile in Normandy. ...read more.

Middle

Harold also supposedly sworn Allegiance to William in 1064 after he had rescued Harold from the count of Ponthieu, Harold was then deceived by having him swear loyalty to William himself over the bones of the concealed bones of a saint. The validity of this promise is questionable however as having been rescued by William and in his care. This all meant that William could successfully submit his claim to throne to Pope Alexander the second who in turn sent him a consecrated banner in support. The rival claim by Harald Hardrada was based on a supposed agreement between his predecessor Magnus I of Norway, and the earlier Danish King of England Harthacanute, whereby if either died without heir, the other would inherit both England and Norway. ...read more.

Conclusion

diminished, exhausted and demoralised force when he did land and no opposition in the channel as Harold has consolidated his ships in London when the Norman invasion failed to occur. Then came the news that the other contender for the throne, Harald III of Norway, allied with Tostig Godwinson, had landed ten miles from York. Harold again raised his army and after a four day forced march defeated Harald and Tostig on 25 September. The English victory came at great cost, however, as Harold's army was left in a battered and weakened state, they had to immediately march to face the Normans at Hastings at which the Norman army triumphed and eliminated the possibility of Harolds resurgence by killing him at the battle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Why Did William Of Normandy Win the Battle of Hastings?

    chance to kill as then they would be stabbed by the opposition because they didn't have chance to take another swipe because it was so heavy. Moreover, Harold's force was inferior to the Norman's army. William had 4000 knights but Harold did not have any.

  2. Am I not a Man and a brother?

    yet, most of those who built this grand, varnish house had crossed the dreadful Middle Passage on the filthy floor below deck for weeks and lived in the small, dusty slave quarters when they arrived - when they were building the grand house and after they finish building it!

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work