• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WW2 Evacuations

Extracts from this document...


Question 1: Which source of evidence is the more useful as evidence about the start of the children's evacuation journey? Source B and C have big differences in useful nesses. Source B is a picture however many people have been known to alter their behavior and emotions while in front of a camera, thus automatically devaluing the pictures real usefulness but from the source being a picture make the source not affected by the interpretations of someone that could have written about the situation or a memory of the situation. However this picture is a primary source and shows where the evacuations take place and the types of people that where evacuated without being affected by opinion. This picture is likely to be real because it shows a view which is similar to many of the different sources available. But we must also realize that this picture only captures the opinions of people for a few seconds, so it doesn't give us an impressive about the whole of the children's evacuation journey. Source C was taken in 1988 it is an interview with a teacher who says she endured the evacuation journey. The source is a personal account of what happened during the start of the evacuation journey and how emotional parents were forced to leave their children. ...read more.


220 words Question 3: "evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Evacuation affected everyone and everywhere within Britain during WW2. These evacuations involved children, teachers, parents and other people. However different people in different groups had different opinions on weather evacuation was a success or not. This was affected by their treatment, the way they worked, adapted and completed their involvement in the task. It is most likely that parents had the worst experience during evacuation; they were told by the government that their children must evacuate to protect them from bombings. They were forced to leave their children in the hands of a stranger and hope that they would return at the end of the war. However this proves that evacuation would save the lives of many children, which in the parent's eyes must have made it a success. However source I challenges this theory, the parent in the source believes that his child is going to "starve". But I know from my own knowledge that this would be very unlikely showing that the parent in source I is ill informed and unprepared to allow his child to leave him, therefore making the evidence in source I unreliable. Source A is an informative piece which is made to teach pupils, it is an anti-evacuation piece of evidence; it portrays evacuation as a process which had many troubles. ...read more.


The more fortunate children were treated like members of the family. This was the first time that many of them experienced a full lifestyle The British government believed its declaration of war would be quickly followed by massive German air attacks on Britain's population. Conservative estimates put civilian casualties in London alone at 4 million. Operation 'Pied Piper' was formulated to reduce this figure. Operation 'Pied Piper' saw the evacuation of over 250,000 children evacuated from cities. Although many children did arrive at the wrong destination, operation 'Pied Piper was successful' so once again proving that evacuation was successful. Evacuation saw large amounts of patriotism arise, many of the host families just wanted to do their bit for the British campaign this include philanthropist who saw an opportunity to help others. However their was a dark side to the evacuation, some individual saw the evacuation as an opportunities to take advantage of the many displaced and unsettled children; by working them hard in the home or on the farm, worse abusing them physically. However this was very much the minority of children. To conclude the findings I feel that evacuation was a success in many ways. It saved the lives of many of the children. Evacuation had caused many improvements to the lives of the city children. 441 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Explain the differencing reactions /feelings of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating ...

    In an interview in 1988 with someone who was an evacuee in 1939 said that ' how I wish the common view on evacuees could be changed, we were not all raised on a diet of fish and chips eaten from newspaper' this shows that not all evacuees were poor

  2. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    In my opinion the observer might have been asking loaded questions to get the negative answers they wanted. Both of these possibilities would make the source unreliable. The source might also have this view because of the purpose and date.

  1. How useful is Source G when examining the children's evacuation journey?

    how the content of Source is portrayed, for example, the tone of a Source could be positive, negative or even humorous. I believe that Source G has a positive tone because the children and foster parents appear happy. It is also humorous because the children are laughing about how Mrs Evans believes they are poor.

  2. In WW2, evacuation was very important for the safety of children, how effective was ...

    Towards the end of the child's stay, the feelings towards them had changed, they learned to love them and get along with them. Some parents didn't really want their children to be evacuated but they sent them away because they knew it was the best for them.

  1. Evacuation in WW2

    by the Government, to try and influence other parents to send their children away. This could prove the photo gave a misleading interpretation to the British public, which would mean that the photo was taken of people forcibly smiling and laughing and waving.

  2. There are a variety of reasons why people had different interpretations of their evacuation ...

    Although the stereotype was not necessarily correct it opened they eyes o the richer people and had an impact n the poorer people of the country. They had a much better life after the war. Source H is a mixed review of evacuation by Jean McCulloch.

  1. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    The photographs from sources D5 and D6 show how men had to volunteer due to the terrible air raids. Some men lost family members and got hurt themselves as demonstrated in the first source of D6. We know these sources are reliable because they are photographs and they are probably

  2. Analysis of sources describing the changes brought about by evacuating children in WW2.

    Source A10 summarises my whole argument. Dr. Penny Starns, a historian and university lecturer, wrote a book called ?The Evacuation of Children during World War 2? in 2004. Source A10 is taken from this book, it outlines that evacuation was a ?life-changing? event and that there was no ?typical evacuee experience?; some were ?pleasant? while some people ?suffered?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work