• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

WW2 Evacuations

Extracts from this document...


Question 1: Which source of evidence is the more useful as evidence about the start of the children's evacuation journey? Source B and C have big differences in useful nesses. Source B is a picture however many people have been known to alter their behavior and emotions while in front of a camera, thus automatically devaluing the pictures real usefulness but from the source being a picture make the source not affected by the interpretations of someone that could have written about the situation or a memory of the situation. However this picture is a primary source and shows where the evacuations take place and the types of people that where evacuated without being affected by opinion. This picture is likely to be real because it shows a view which is similar to many of the different sources available. But we must also realize that this picture only captures the opinions of people for a few seconds, so it doesn't give us an impressive about the whole of the children's evacuation journey. Source C was taken in 1988 it is an interview with a teacher who says she endured the evacuation journey. The source is a personal account of what happened during the start of the evacuation journey and how emotional parents were forced to leave their children. ...read more.


220 words Question 3: "evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Evacuation affected everyone and everywhere within Britain during WW2. These evacuations involved children, teachers, parents and other people. However different people in different groups had different opinions on weather evacuation was a success or not. This was affected by their treatment, the way they worked, adapted and completed their involvement in the task. It is most likely that parents had the worst experience during evacuation; they were told by the government that their children must evacuate to protect them from bombings. They were forced to leave their children in the hands of a stranger and hope that they would return at the end of the war. However this proves that evacuation would save the lives of many children, which in the parent's eyes must have made it a success. However source I challenges this theory, the parent in the source believes that his child is going to "starve". But I know from my own knowledge that this would be very unlikely showing that the parent in source I is ill informed and unprepared to allow his child to leave him, therefore making the evidence in source I unreliable. Source A is an informative piece which is made to teach pupils, it is an anti-evacuation piece of evidence; it portrays evacuation as a process which had many troubles. ...read more.


The more fortunate children were treated like members of the family. This was the first time that many of them experienced a full lifestyle The British government believed its declaration of war would be quickly followed by massive German air attacks on Britain's population. Conservative estimates put civilian casualties in London alone at 4 million. Operation 'Pied Piper' was formulated to reduce this figure. Operation 'Pied Piper' saw the evacuation of over 250,000 children evacuated from cities. Although many children did arrive at the wrong destination, operation 'Pied Piper was successful' so once again proving that evacuation was successful. Evacuation saw large amounts of patriotism arise, many of the host families just wanted to do their bit for the British campaign this include philanthropist who saw an opportunity to help others. However their was a dark side to the evacuation, some individual saw the evacuation as an opportunities to take advantage of the many displaced and unsettled children; by working them hard in the home or on the farm, worse abusing them physically. However this was very much the minority of children. To conclude the findings I feel that evacuation was a success in many ways. It saved the lives of many of the children. Evacuation had caused many improvements to the lives of the city children. 441 words ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. To what ways and to what extent did the lives of the British people ...

    The photographs from sources D5 and D6 show how men had to volunteer due to the terrible air raids. Some men lost family members and got hurt themselves as demonstrated in the first source of D6. We know these sources are reliable because they are photographs and they are probably

  2. History Assignment 2

    Men were also worried that women may lower the standards of training due to the fact women were working men's jobs without lengthy processes of training. They were particularly anxious that women may lower the men's wages because the women were doing the work and being paid so much less.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The observer probably wanted to see if another evacuation would be popular by carrying out a survey because at this time, Germany had captured French airbases making Germany more of a threat to Britain. The interviewer might also have had their own opinion of evacuation so wanted to persuade the public to share his view.

  2. Explain the differencing reactions /feelings of people in Britain to the policy of evacuating ...

    and lived the lifestyle of a 'common city child' that was assumed and not necessarily true. The hosts were forced into looking after evacuees even though they were paid per week. Most hosts thought the evacuees would be flea ridden, poor and starved so they looked down upon them, the

  1. Evacuation in WW2

    by the Government, to try and influence other parents to send their children away. This could prove the photo gave a misleading interpretation to the British public, which would mean that the photo was taken of people forcibly smiling and laughing and waving.

  2. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    The total percentage of positive and negative sources is divided in a very biased distribution. Negative stories and sources overwhelmingly outnumber those of a positive genre. This leads us to believe that similar statistics apply to the ratio of competent Billeting Officers to quintessentially stupid ones.

  1. There are a variety of reasons why people had different interpretations of their evacuation ...

    This source shows us very well the stereotype that developed throughout the evacuation process. The source implies that all of the evacuees were dirty and unhealthy. Because of the stereotype the experience for the evacuation host was negative. At one point in the source the children are called 'verminous'.

  2. Which source is the most useful as evidence about the start of the children's ...

    of children looking happy about being evacuated, the parents would come round to thinking that evacuation was a positive thing. This use of propaganda makes Source B a very unreliable source because it is trying to show the parents of the children who were about to be evacuated that evacuation was a positive action.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work