• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13
14. 14
14
15. 15
15
16. 16
16
17. 17
17
18. 18
18
19. 19
19
20. 20
20
• Level: GCSE
• Subject: Maths
• Word count: 4736

# I am conducting an experiment to show the relationship between the rate of reaction when catching a ruler under normal circums

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

My Data handling coursework

I am conducting an experiment to show the relationship between the rate of reaction when catching a ruler under normal circumstances (a quiet distraction free room) and those when under the influence of a distraction (Music from a CD player).

I will do this by dropping a ruler from a fixed and constant height from the test subject’s hand, and measuring the length (in cm) that it takes them to grasp the ruler as it is falling. Using a formula I can convert this into a time result. I will also repeat this when a distraction of music is being played, and observe whether or not there is a difference between the results.

Using this data, from a stratified random sample across the school, I hope to be able to prove or disprove a set of hypothesis that I will make based on my own, justified, opinions of reaction abilities between males and females and with distraction or without a distraction.

For the first drop, where there is no distraction, it would evidently be sensible to do the test in an empty, quiet room, where there is no chance of interruption, giving the subject full concentration on their task. This should make the test as fair as possible

Middle

5

8

M

15

16

0.18

0.17

6

8

M

46

42

0.29

0.30

7

8

M

64

28

0.24

0.36

8

8

M

28

12

0.15

0.24

9

8

M

46

32

0.25

0.30

1

8

F

17

28

0.24

0.18

2

8

F

85

42

0.29

0.41

3

8

F

80

52

0.32

0.40

4

8

F

30

39

0.28

0.24

5

8

F

41

23

0.21

0.29

6

8

F

30

29

0.24

0.24

7

8

F

52

47

0.31

0.32

8

8

F

57

47

0.31

0.34

9

8

F

39

22

0.21

0.28

10

8

F

30

27

0.23

0.24

11

8

F

52

35

0.26

0.32

1

9

M

26

22

0.21

0.23

2

9

M

16

25

0.22

0.18

3

9

M

36

20

0.20

0.27

4

9

M

74

65

0.36

0.38

5

9

M

38

21

0.20

0.28

6

9

M

29

22

0.21

0.24

7

9

M

52

31

0.25

0.32

8

9

M

30

12

0.15

0.24

9

9

M

22

5

0.10

0.21

10

9

M

27

10

0.14

0.23

1

9

F

23

19

0.19

0.21

2

9

F

29

17

0.18

0.24

3

9

F

39

35

0.26

0.28

4

9

F

37

28

0.24

0.27

5

9

F

29

30

0.24

0.24

6

9

F

17

40

0.28

0.18

7

9

F

36

14

0.17

0.27

8

9

F

13

12

0.15

0.16

9

9

F

18

16

0.18

0.19

1

10

M

30

15

0.17

0.24

2

10

M

27

7

0.12

0.23

3

10

M

18

16

0.18

0.19

4

10

M

47

25

0.22

0.31

5

10

M

19

29

0.24

0.19

6

10

M

60

32

0.25

0.35

7

10

M

85

40

0.28

0.41

8

10

M

30

29

0.24

0.24

9

10

M

28

20

0.20

0.24

1

10

F

35

15

0.17

0.26

2

10

F

30

42

0.29

0.24

3

10

F

35

40

0.28

0.26

4

10

F

28

27

0.23

0.24

5

10

F

20

20

0.20

0.20

6

10

F

20

13

0.16

0.20

7

10

F

36

32

0.25

0.27

8

10

F

23

28

0.24

0.21

9

10

F

25

22

0.21

0.22

10

10

F

11

19

0.19

0.15

11

10

F

25

20

0.20

0.22

1

11

M

14

21

0.20

0.17

2

11

M

26

28

0.24

0.23

3

11

M

8

1

0.04

0.13

4

11

M

29

19

0.19

0.24

5

11

M

20

12

0.15

0.20

6

11

M

41

29

0.24

0.29

7

11

M

20

20

0.20

0.20

8

11

M

20

18

0.19

0.20

9

11

M

54

19

0.19

0.33

10

11

M

27

24

0.22

0.23

1

11

F

40

8

0.13

0.28

2

11

F

30

20

0.20

0.24

3

11

F

45

10

0.14

0.30

4

11

F

12

13

0.16

0.15

5

11

F

32

28

0.24

0.25

6

11

F

24

20

0.20

0.22

7

11

F

16

18

0.19

0.18

8

11

F

28

25

0.22

0.24

9

11

F

20

11

0.15

0.20

10

11

F

31

10

0.14

0.25

11

11

F

35

28

0.24

0.26

 Mean Standard Deviation Without Distraction 0.22 0.0532 With Distraction 0.25 0.0596

The standard deviation is a way of comparing 2 sets of data.

∑(x-x)²

n

x – piece of data

x – mean of the set of data

n – number of pieces of data

∑ - ‘sum of’

Using this data I can begin to start working on the hypotheses. Firstly, I will create a scatter graph and work out the correlation coefficient to see if there is a link between the two sets of time data.

Hypothesis 1

Correlation

From this it is possible to see a weak positive correlation between the two sets of results. Looking at the correlation coefficient (a number between –1 and 1) which shows between 2 sets of data the size of the correlation: -

The correlation co-efficient is: 0.548655.

Normally for a good link to exist this number should be above 0.7 so we can see that there is not a great relationship between the two sets but that there is at least a small connection.

First of all I sorted the data. Then I drew up 2 cumulative frequency tables.

 Distraction reaction time Frequency Cumulative Frequency 0.00

From these I then constructed a cumulative frequency graph.

From the cumulative frequency diagram I can see that the non-distraction times are quicker as the have more of a steep curve. The times with Distraction have not got as steep a curve, which shows that the reaction times are not as fast as those which haven’t been distracted.

 No distraction Distraction Mean 0.22 Mean 0.25 Median 0.22 Median 0.24 Mode 0.2 Mode 0.244949 Minimum 0.04 Minimum 0.13 Max 0.36 Max 0.42 Range 0.32 Range 0.29 STDV 0.053224 STDV 0.0596

Conclusion

spread is fairly consistent, though they have higher results, and the majority results are at the beginning.

I have found out that females are better at multi tasking than males. This is true because the mean for the females is lower than the males; the median is lower for the females. This shows that the results are more consistent, therefore making them better at multi tasking than men.

The frequency polygon shows that the female spread is more consistent than the males, as the males has a fluctuation in the middle, whereas the female results are fairly consistent throughout.

From the histogram I can tell that the females’ differences are spread more evenly than the males, as the males’ differences are concentrated in the middle area.

These factors prove that females are better at multi tasking than males.

The Overall Conclusion.

My first hypothesis was that I thought Reaction times would be faster without a distraction. I have used a cumulative frequency graph, a scatter graph, the mean, median, mode, the minimum and maximum results, standard deviation and correlation co-efficient to successfully prove my hypothesis correct.

My second hypothesis was that I thought that the difference between the two sets of results, being distracted or not, will be lower for the girls and higher for the boys. I used the mean, median, mode, minimum and maximum results, a Histogram and Frequency Polygons to successfully prove that females are better at multi tasking.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

1. ## Is there a link

indeed confirm that in both cases there is little, if any, skew ness in the data. I am pleased with this result because it therefore not only allows me to conclude that in both Science and Maths, the students on average scored a level 4 in their Key Stage 2

2. ## Show that different people have different reaction times according to their gender and the ...

25 1 24 25 - 30 0 24 Females: Reaction Time Frequency Cumulative Frequency 0 > 5 0 0 5 > 10 1 1 10 > 15 8 9 15 > 20 10 19 20 > 25 4 23 25 - 30 1 24 Cumulative Frequency: This graph shows that

1. ## The media are a primary factor governing the circulation of subculture

She is the representation of McDermott's (1996) contention of physicality as an agency where the ideas are surrounded by: "the positive expression of the embodied self, control, power, capability, personal change, knowledgeability, and unintended consequences" (p19). Throughout the narrative, you begin to understand and perceive the change of Diana Guzman

2. ## Maths Data Handling

For both of these results, the range of heights and weights for boys was larger than for the girls. This means that there will be quite a few boys that are under the height of 156 cm (the mean height for girls)

1. ## Q2 With detailed reference to your specific area of study, analyse and discuss the ...

or female adversaries who would have to be overcome. Predictably, these films were more popular with male audiences. A few action films now have stronger female protagonists in the lead role e.g. the Alien Films, Terminator 2, Tomb Raider and Charlie's Angels. In the 1970s the representation of women as sex objects in the media was seen by feminists as central to women's oppression.

2. ## Investigating Gender Differences in Helping.

This study demonstrated that experiencing a mood-lifting event, such as receiving money, may lessen our motivation to relieve our negative state by helping others. However, it also demonstrated that sometimes people experiencing empathy help primarily to relieve another person's suffering.

1. ## Is race and intelligence a justifiable area of research in psychology?

so no percentages should be placed on the genetic or environmental contributions. The focus should not be whether intelligence is inherited but whether within group differences of IQ can be used to conclude differences between-groups. Richards (1997) used height to illustrate.

2. ## Investigate the factors affecting the motion of a trolley.

I will also be calculating the average speed of the trolley. I predict that with a greater height, there will be a higher average speed. The reason for this is that speed is distance over time. If the distance stays the same but the time decreases (the height of the ramp is increased), the average speed will increase.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to